Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

AC8646 (CR9 / C-GNJZ) collides with vehicle at LGA

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AC8646 (CR9 / C-GNJZ) collides with vehicle at LGA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 2:21 am
  #46  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Mar 2026
Location: Gate D49 Pearson Terminal 1
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
For those unaware, NY Post has video and reports;
- two pilots dead and
- two Port Authority who work on the Port Authority Police Department’s Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighter Unit, which is staffed by police to respond to aircraft emergencies — suffered broken bones and are expected to survive,
- A female flight attendant was ejected through the front of the aircraft while still in her seat during the crash — and survived.

Fortunately the fuel tanks were not punctured and a fire was avoided. It would have been. devastating otherwise. The one remaining AC FA, will have had to deal with this alone. The images indicate no exit chutes were deployed, with wing exits used. This is going to be one awful event to process for the surviving FAs and passengers. 76 passengers, 4 crew.
The next few days are gonna be tough… I can’t imagine how everyone that was involved in the whole thing including the united flight feel.
StandbyFlyerAC is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 2:30 am
  #47  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 252
Sad situation. Interesting that the fire truck was less damaged than the plane. I guess they are beasts as they look. I pity the controller and his family, looks like he worked both ground and incoming traffic and misspoke giving clearance for fire 1 to pass runway 4.
sillypainter is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 2:33 am
  #48  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Mar 2026
Location: Gate D49 Pearson Terminal 1
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by sillypainter
Sad situation. Interesting that the fire truck was less damaged than the plane. I guess they are beasts as they look. I pity the controller and his family, looks like he worked both ground and incoming traffic and misspoke giving clearance for fire 1 to pass runway 4.
The system screwed the poor guy over… seriously it’s unacceptable to make someone work both Ground and Tower ESPECIALLY IN THE NEW YORK AREA. Shocker, absolute shocker.
StandbyFlyerAC is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 2:59 am
  #49  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 6,114
What’s the NTSB going to say? It looks like there is only one layer of safety in this with just one controller?
Would the Jazz pilots know or realize that the fire truck was cleared to cross the runway as they were landing? Would the Truck know that an aircraft was cleared to land? I’m devastated that this has happened. The controller must be heartbroken as well as the families of the pilots.
Davvidd is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 3:00 am
  #50  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Mar 2026
Location: Gate D49 Pearson Terminal 1
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by Davvidd
What’s the NTSB going to say? It looks like there is only one layer of safety in this with just one controller?
Would the Jazz pilots know or realize that the fire truck was cleared to cross the runway as they were landing? Would the Truck know that an aircraft was cleared to land? I’m devastated that this has happened. The controller must be heartbroken as well as the families of the pilots.
If you listen to the full ATC recording, you could hear just how distraught the ATC is, he blamed himself for it multiple times. Genuinely sounded like he was about to break down. Poor guy…
StandbyFlyerAC is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 3:13 am
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,681
This is so sad - for the pilots and their families and for the controller who make the mistake. It could have been much worse.
Davvidd likes this.
username is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 3:18 am
  #52  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 6,114
Does anyone know what the position of The Jazz aircraft was when Truck 1? was cleared to cross at D?
Davvidd is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 4:14 am
  #53  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Programs: QF, CoUniHound Refugee
Posts: 520
Air Canada Webpage for Incident Launched

Just thought I’d share that Air Canada has updated their site and has a webpage with information related to the incident:
https://www.aircanada.com/incident/page/home.html#
kangarooflyer88 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 4:27 am
  #54  
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 199
Originally Posted by Davvidd
Does anyone know what the position of The Jazz aircraft was when Truck 1? was cleared to cross at D?
I’ve seen reports that they were doing 39km/hour at the time of collision and it sounds like 8-10 seconds between the first clearance and when the collision happened.

So I think Jazz had to be down or very close to landing when the initial clearance was given.

I’ll also note that the clearance was given and read back as “Cross 4” and not “Cross Runway 0-4” which makes it even harder for Jazz (or others) to perk up on the conflict.

You have to feel terrible for everyone involved and touched by this accident. We’ll need the full investigation but it definitely feels like one of those accidents that will expose a lot of vulnerabilities in the ATC system that people have been talking about for years without gaining traction.
Joeyjo is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 4:58 am
  #55  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: EXT, sometimes LON/SFO/NYC/YQT
Programs: Aeroplan, Marriott Bonvoy
Posts: 1,085
I genuinely did shed tears this morn after seeing this thread and checking the news. This is heartbreaking.

There is little a random stranger on the internet can do to help anyone heal, but I hope this community's compassion comes through.

Rest in peace.
D404 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 5:00 am
  #56  
500k
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver, Marriott Titanium (LTG), LH Senator, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,419
Originally Posted by StandbyFlyerAC
If you listen to the full ATC recording, you could hear just how distraught the ATC is, he blamed himself for it multiple times. Genuinely sounded like he was about to break down. Poor guy…
I can't help but feel for the guy, really and truly.

Main thoughts to the pilots and crew, and of course passengers. Yet another example of reasons to be aware at all times on a moving plane and listen to flight crew.

As an aside - bear in mind I have no knowledge in this area - is it normal/within regulations to have only one person controlling in this situation? From a completely lay person's point of view this feels like it should be manned by more than one person at a time.

I work despatching emergency vehicles and we have 2 despatchers and a controller overseeing at ALL times on the one channel - and air traffic has FAR more risk involved on a large scale.

(I'm also in the UK so maybe there are different regulations in the US)
CJ99 and gelmore95030 like this.
Coffeemadman is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 5:21 am
  #57  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YOW
Programs: AC P(easant)25K
Posts: 1,183
This is really hit too close to home.
I was literally on this exact fin not that long ago...

Originally Posted by secretalcoholic
Was checking travel advisory for AC tomorrow and they claim LGA is closed due to political activity?!



correct, looks like they were cleared to land, then ATC cleared the firetruck to cross active runway while perhaps forgetting the AC was coming in hot. But stop notice came too late…
This is just awful...
It seems like the plane was landed on Runway 4, struck the vehicle at exit E while decelerating toward exit F or Q, around 30-50 kts at impact?

This one hits too close too home, I have come to known a couple Jazz crew personally, seeing those pictures and learning the news is very unsettling. I honestly don't know how I feel right now.

Last edited by Leyland1989; Mar 23, 2026 at 5:45 am
Leyland1989 is online now  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 5:23 am
  #58  
Formerly known as newbie elite
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,517
Delete

Last edited by Admiral Ackbar; Mar 23, 2026 at 6:28 pm
Admiral Ackbar is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 5:35 am
  #59  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hotlanta.
Programs: DL (duh), AA 1MM, Bonvoy Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 8,452
Originally Posted by Admiral Ackbar
I am not going to get into it here because not a aviation professional but there are major differences between ICAO procedures and what the FAA does in the name of expediency.

….. Brits have been complaining for years about US ATC on forums.
A lot of this difference is politics and not safety. As you said up front, this is probably best left to professionals and not for discussion on an enthusiasts forum.
emma dog is online now  
Old Mar 23, 2026 | 6:06 am
  #60  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,700
Given the increasing number of ATC close calls over the last few years (that seem to be increasing recently based on my subjective viewing of ATC incidents) on top of the staffing situation, not to mention the stress caused by US Budget issues, perhaps the saddest thing about this was how utterly predictable it was. Despite the horrific loss of life here, it could have been a lot worse. And the conditions for more incidents are still ever-present.
PLeblond is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.