Last edit by: briguychau
2016 777 Routes
*FAQ
Q: Are all 777s refurbished?
A: Yes, all active 777s have the new configuration (Executive Pod) J suites, Premium Economy, and 10-across Economy seats.
Q: Are the dividers in the middle J seats moveable? Can they be slid up/down?
A: No, all Dream Cabin J seat dividers do not come down and are fixed in place.
Summer 2016 777 International Routes
End of summer schedule changes will be added in the future
77L (40J-24O-236Y : 300 pax)
Calgary – London Heathrow: AC850/851
Toronto – Hong Kong: AC15/16
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC858/859
Toronto – Vancouver – Sydney: AC33/34
77W (40J-24O-336Y : 400 pax)
Toronto – Beijing: AC31/32
Toronto – Frankfurt: AC872/873
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC856/869
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC848/849
Toronto – Paris CDG: AC880/881
Toronto – Rome Fiumicino: AC890/891 until Sep 12 (out), Sep 13 (in)
Toronto – Shanghai Pudong: AC87/88
Toronto – Tokyo Haneda: AC5/6
Vancouver – Shanghai Pudong: AC25/26
Vancouver – Tokyo Narita: AC3/4
77W (28J-24O-398Y : 450 pax)
Montreal – London Heathrow: AC864/865
Montreal – Paris CDG: AC870/871
Montreal – Paris CDG: AC884/885
Vancouver – Beijing: AC29/30
Vancouver – Hong Kong: AC7/8
Vancouver – London Heathrow: AC854/855
*FAQ
Q: Are all 777s refurbished?
A: Yes, all active 777s have the new configuration (Executive Pod) J suites, Premium Economy, and 10-across Economy seats.
Q: Are the dividers in the middle J seats moveable? Can they be slid up/down?
A: No, all Dream Cabin J seat dividers do not come down and are fixed in place.
Summer 2016 777 International Routes
End of summer schedule changes will be added in the future
77L (40J-24O-236Y : 300 pax)
Calgary – London Heathrow: AC850/851
Toronto – Hong Kong: AC15/16
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC858/859
Toronto – Vancouver – Sydney: AC33/34
77W (40J-24O-336Y : 400 pax)
Toronto – Beijing: AC31/32
Toronto – Frankfurt: AC872/873
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC856/869
Toronto – London Heathrow: AC848/849
Toronto – Paris CDG: AC880/881
Toronto – Rome Fiumicino: AC890/891 until Sep 12 (out), Sep 13 (in)
Toronto – Shanghai Pudong: AC87/88
Toronto – Tokyo Haneda: AC5/6
Vancouver – Shanghai Pudong: AC25/26
Vancouver – Tokyo Narita: AC3/4
77W (28J-24O-398Y : 450 pax)
Montreal – London Heathrow: AC864/865
Montreal – Paris CDG: AC870/871
Montreal – Paris CDG: AC884/885
Vancouver – Beijing: AC29/30
Vancouver – Hong Kong: AC7/8
Vancouver – London Heathrow: AC854/855
Code:
Aircraft Tracking (last updated Jun 16, 2016) Plane Status Location Details 77L (40J-24O-236Y : 300 pax) C-FIUA-701 Done Loc:HKG In:Apr 09/16 Out:May 09/16 (30 days) C-FIUF-702 Done Loc:HKG In:Nov 08/15 Out:Dec 27/15 (49 days) C-FIUJ-703 Done Loc:HKG In:Dec 27/15 Out:Feb 04/16 (39 days) C-FIVK-704 Done Loc:HKG In:May 09/16 Out:Jun 08/16 (30 days) C-FNND-705 Done Loc:HKG In:Mar 09/16 Out:Apr 09/16 (31 days) C-FNNH-706 Done Loc:HKG In:Feb 04/16 Out:Mar 09/16 (34 days) 77W (40J-24O-336Y : 400 pax) C-FITL-731 Done Loc:GSO In:Sep 01/15 Out:Nov 20/15 (80 Days) C-FITU-732 Done Loc:GSO In:May 03/16 Out:Jun 05/16 (33 days) C-FITW-733 Done Loc:GSO In:Nov 23/15 Out:Jan 06/16 (45 days) C-FIUL-734 Done Loc:GSO In:Mar 16/16 Out:Apr 17/16 (32 days) C-FIUR-735 Done Loc:GSO In:Dec 09/15 Out:Jan 18/16 (40 days) C-FIUV-736 Done Loc:GSO In:Feb 26/16 Out:Apr 02/16 (36 days) C-FIUW-737 Done Loc:GSO In:Jan 06/16 Out:Feb 12/16 (37 days) C-FIVM-738 Done Loc:GSO In:Feb 13/16 Out:Mar 16/16 (32 days) C-FRAM-739 Done Loc:GSO In:Apr 02/16 Out:May 02/16 (30 days) C-FIVQ-740 Done Loc:GSO In:Jan 20/16 Out:Feb 26/16 (37 days) C-FIVR-741 Done Loc:GSO In:Apr 17/16 Out:May 17/16 (30 days) C-FIVS-742 Done Loc:GSO In:Oct 23/15 Out:Dec 08/15 (46 days) 77W (28J-24O-398Y : 450 pax) C-FIVW-743 Done Loc:YMX In:Mar 28/16 Out:Apr 23/16 (26 days) C-FIVX-744 Done Loc:YMX In:May 21/16 Out:Jun 03/16 (13 days) C-FNNQ-745 Done Loc:YMX In:Jun 03/16 Out:Jun 16/16 (13 days) C-FNNU-746 Done Loc:YMX In:May 06/16 Out:May 21/16 (15 days) C-FNNW-747 Done Loc:YMX In:Apr 23/16 Out:May 06/16 (13 days) C-FJZS-748 In Service Loc:YMX FF:Mar 24/16 Del:Apr 26/16 EIS:May 18/16 C-FKAU-749 In Service Loc:YMX FF:May 01/16 Del:May 21/16 EIS:Jun 10/16
Air Canada plans to refurbish 18 of its 777
#526
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
#527
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,648
#529
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
Without giving AC any ideas here.... it's a bit sad that the CRA has the most comfortable Y- of any aircraft in the AC/ACE/ACr fleet. That 9/84Y E90 was a sweet ride too.
#530
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,648
With the new slimline seats like the 788 I personally don't find the legroom to be any worse than the old seat's 32". It sure isn't luxury though.
Without giving AC any ideas here.... it's a bit sad that the CRA has the most comfortable Y- of any aircraft in the AC/ACE/ACr fleet. That 9/84Y E90 was a sweet ride too.
Without giving AC any ideas here.... it's a bit sad that the CRA has the most comfortable Y- of any aircraft in the AC/ACE/ACr fleet. That 9/84Y E90 was a sweet ride too.
#531
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
I haven't ever been in HD Y so I wouldn't know
But, every time I've been onboard Y has been close enough to 100% I felt uncomfortable sitting down to try a seat out. So AC has that going for it.
I'm pretty sure they are the same. 787 may have 1 model newer to fit the ex3 IFE though.
But, every time I've been onboard Y has been close enough to 100% I felt uncomfortable sitting down to try a seat out. So AC has that going for it.
I'm pretty sure they are the same. 787 may have 1 model newer to fit the ex3 IFE though.
#532
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto
Programs: Air Canada SE
Posts: 33
I wasn't able to select any seats in row 7 when checking in, but have just moved back to 7K since the metal floor plate / carpet in 6K has worked loose already
#533
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,381
It's from the back of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you. Which means if your seat is thick, the distance you actually care about (the FRONT of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you) is reduced.
I don't remember what airline or aircraft I was on, but the back seat cushion must have been four inches thick. Sure, they had decent pitch, but the effective room was horrible.
#534
Formerly known as tireman77
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,539
Right. Pitch actually isn't a great measurement.
It's from the back of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you. Which means if your seat is thick, the distance you actually care about (the FRONT of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you) is reduced.
I don't remember what airline or aircraft I was on, but the back seat cushion must have been four inches thick. Sure, they had decent pitch, but the effective room was horrible.
It's from the back of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you. Which means if your seat is thick, the distance you actually care about (the FRONT of your seat to the back of the seat in front of you) is reduced.
I don't remember what airline or aircraft I was on, but the back seat cushion must have been four inches thick. Sure, they had decent pitch, but the effective room was horrible.
Technically, pitch is the narrowest measurement from a point on a seat to the same point on the seat in front of it. The usual spot pitch is measured is the front floor mount bracket, I believe .
#535
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,381
But that's not helpful in determining actual space, so I use another equivalent point :P
#536
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,811
Distance from one point to the same point on the previous row is one and the same for all/any point. No such thing as the "narrowest one."
#537
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MLL / AC Cafe
Programs: It's hard to get status when the website won't let me book flights.
Posts: 5,706
#538
Formerly known as tireman77
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,539
As I said, its semantics, and Cow's point is still very valid. There are people screaming bloody murder about seat pitch and how awful it is at 30" when using slimline seat could actually offer more space than an older thicker seat at 33" or 34". Passenger reads 31". Freaks. Sits and laments how tight it is, with actually more personal space. People tend to have made up their minds before even trying the product. Humans are often...dumb.
#539
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan
Posts: 1,748
788 seats are one generation newer than 777HD ones. Both are equally miserable. Legroom is definitely less than in the old 77W spec. If you are vertically challenged, it may not matter. If you are around 6 feet, it makes a huge difference.