p.s. Operations Transitioning to EWR on October 25, 2015
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
This will increasing make *A flights at JFK O&D as there will be fewer convenient feeder flights operated by partners. NYC is a big O&D market, but some partners operate nonstop flights to/from some rather exotic destinations that aren't easily served via other routes.
The major *A partners at JFK to Europe were mostly LH group airlines, and of those, LX, and LH both have nonstops out of SFO and LAX so its not like it was a seamless connection out of JFK.
#47
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LAS ORD
Programs: AA Pro (mostly B6) OZ♦ (flying BR/UA), BA Silver Hyatt LT, Wynn Black, Cosmo Plat, Mlife Noir
Posts: 5,992
Several FT'ers called the JFK>EWR switch for p.s. in the thread on JFK-IAD cancellation.
I think it's very likely p.s. will be entirely eliminated at some point. Typical UA - death by a thousand cuts.
Also agree with many other FT'ers in this thread - this is a devaluation of *A, as it eliminates the possibility of west coast fliers connecting in JFK to *A carriers who serve JFK.
I think it's very likely p.s. will be entirely eliminated at some point. Typical UA - death by a thousand cuts.
Also agree with many other FT'ers in this thread - this is a devaluation of *A, as it eliminates the possibility of west coast fliers connecting in JFK to *A carriers who serve JFK.
#48
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 6,546
nice for LAX passengers flying long-haul to Europe to get flat beds the whole way - I never even considered UA to Europe because half the travel time would be in domestic F.
#49
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
United plans to swap its slots at Kennedy with Delta Air Lines Inc. and take Delta’s slots at Newark.
Yea... because those slots at EWR are just as valuable as JFK.
Yea... because those slots at EWR are just as valuable as JFK.
LH completed an upgrade to its lounge facilities at EWR and at the time, some observed that the A++ might be revising the LH group capacity balance to tip more in favor of EWR. There's certainly less competition there and a lot more in-JV feed.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
I think this is a huge win for jetBlue... all the *A carriers will partner with them for transcons (as some already have) rather than AA/DL.
#51
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Too many
Programs: Lots
Posts: 5,761
Proof that United can't compete on product. At all.
#52
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Agreed. The Van Wyck is no picnic but the Lincoln Tunnel is worse. And NJ Transit via Penn is not always a viable option, especially not the midtown business executives who take a service to the airport. A meaningful percentage of Manhattan business travelers simply will not fly EWR.
#53
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,236
LH big time. Better connections with earlier arrivals to some EU airports, like EWR-DUS-BUD, which I've done several times.
#55
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond, UA 1K MM, SPG Plat For Life, Marriott Plat, Nexus/GlobalEntry
Posts: 9,198
What UA is saying...and they are right...is that they can't possibly please everyone everywhere. If JFK is your airport then you need to choose AA or DL. But at EWR.. UA is going to be by far your best option for a mainline carrier.
#56
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: UA, Starwood, Priority Club, Hertz, Starbucks Gold Card
Posts: 3,952
This is exactly my initial thought. The p.s. brand has already been badly mismanaged, and moving it to EWR will kill it.
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Overall this is a smart move for UA. There really was no reason to keep those 2 very lucrative routes isolated at JFK from the rest of all those feeder flights at EWR...it made no sense.
What UA is saying...and they are right...is that they can't possibly please everyone everywhere. If JFK is your airport then you need to choose AA or DL. But at EWR.. UA is going to be by far your best option for a mainline carrier.
What UA is saying...and they are right...is that they can't possibly please everyone everywhere. If JFK is your airport then you need to choose AA or DL. But at EWR.. UA is going to be by far your best option for a mainline carrier.
EWR is not going to support the premium fares UA wants from these flights. ps has always been about the high dollar banking/entertainment/fashion industry traffic, and that traffic prefers JFK.
When UA and CO merged, CO was selling lie flats SFO-EWR on the int'l 752 for 1/3 the price of ps SFO-JFK.
#58
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: EWR
Programs: UA Gold, UA MM, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,329
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
What UA is saying...and they are right...is that they can't possibly please everyone everywhere. If JFK is your airport then you need to choose AA or DL. But at EWR.. UA is going to be by far your best option for a mainline carrier.
pmUnited had said it was profitable in their low-density 3 class 757s...
#60
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 630
I have really, really enjoyed using SDC between JFK & LGA. Perhaps now we could beg for EWR & LGA to be a co-terminal? Rrrrrrright.