Why does United put 757s on certain flights from EWR to europe
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: CLL DFW IAH
Posts: 86
Why does United put 757s on certain flights from EWR to europe
my comments on another thread have reminded me that I have been meaning to post this but : Why does United think putting 757s on flights to places like Berlin, Oslo, Stuttgart etc is profitable. Maybe some of the flights wouldn't get cut if it wasn't for this
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,470
You have it backwards. UA can only fly to these second tier cities because they have the 752. Those flights don't generate enough traffic to support a widebody.
This topic has been beaten to death, over and over again.
This topic has been beaten to death, over and over again.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,891
And have you asked in the AA or DL forums why those carriers also think using 757s TATL are profitable?
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
I cant believe Im saying this, but after having to endure a LH in Y, Id be thrilled to be on a UA 752 in E+ , the more citys they fly them into the better the chances of a Saver Y being able to be had
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
#5
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
I've had countless EWR-TXL-EWR flights in the 752 and it has been fine and seems that it's always a fairly full load.
They've put a 3 class 763 on for the summer months, I'll be on it in less than 2 weeks and I'm interested to see what that looks like.
They've put a 3 class 763 on for the summer months, I'll be on it in less than 2 weeks and I'm interested to see what that looks like.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
I cant believe Im saying this, but after having to endure a LH in Y, Id be thrilled to be on a UA 752 in E+ , the more citys they fly them into the better the chances of a Saver Y being able to be had
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
#8
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA *G 1MM LT United Club & Global Entry
Posts: 2,756
SunLover
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
When fuel costs are lower and the flights are close to capacity these are profitable routes. Continental was ahead of its time when they began flying the narrow body 752 to second tier European destinations in the early 2000’s. They equipped the aircraft with extra fuel capacity specifically to make the journey. The business model to service long/thin international routes was the reason Boeing developed the 787.
SunLover
SunLover
They major modifications were the addition of winglets which added about 200 nm to the range of these a/c and a new type of brakes which reduced weight.
Also, while it is true that a smaller a/c is more economical to operate on a "long-thin" route, one of the main reasons CO decided to operate the 752's on TATL is that they had this type of a/c in their fleet and this was a creative, profitable way to operate them.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern Bavaria, Germany
Programs: LH Blue, BA Blue, Hyatt Gold
Posts: 1,517
Berlin doesn't have enough market potential
Just would like to add some personal impressions concerning the US-TXL route.
Back in the 90s Lufthansa tried to use a widebody aircraft on the route TXL-HAM-New York. It was a tiny A310 with extended range. After a short period of time (if I remember correctly was less than one year) this route was discontinued.
Berlin simply hadn't the market potential to support such a large aircraft especially in the profitable travel classes First and Business. So I can only *assume* that the things haven't changed dramatically.
Not many of German's leading corporations have their headquarters in Berlin, the main stock exchange is in Frankfurt.
In 2003 even Berlin's mayor Mr. Wowereit said that Berlin is "arm, aber sexy"
http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschl...id_117712.html
With a high unemployment rate and lower average salaries than e.g. in Dusseldorf, Munich or Frankfurt it is simply not the best hub for intercontinental travel.
That said the capacity of the B757 seems to be perfect.
Maybe the aircraft size of a Privatair Business Jet would also fit, but I don't know the difference in operating costs vw. additional revenue:
http://www.lufthansagroup.com/de/unt...7-800-igw.html
Just thinking that using a large bird and opening up many lower booking classes for Economy Class travel simply doesn't work.
Back in the 90s Lufthansa tried to use a widebody aircraft on the route TXL-HAM-New York. It was a tiny A310 with extended range. After a short period of time (if I remember correctly was less than one year) this route was discontinued.
Berlin simply hadn't the market potential to support such a large aircraft especially in the profitable travel classes First and Business. So I can only *assume* that the things haven't changed dramatically.
Not many of German's leading corporations have their headquarters in Berlin, the main stock exchange is in Frankfurt.
In 2003 even Berlin's mayor Mr. Wowereit said that Berlin is "arm, aber sexy"
http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschl...id_117712.html
With a high unemployment rate and lower average salaries than e.g. in Dusseldorf, Munich or Frankfurt it is simply not the best hub for intercontinental travel.
That said the capacity of the B757 seems to be perfect.
Maybe the aircraft size of a Privatair Business Jet would also fit, but I don't know the difference in operating costs vw. additional revenue:
http://www.lufthansagroup.com/de/unt...7-800-igw.html
Just thinking that using a large bird and opening up many lower booking classes for Economy Class travel simply doesn't work.
#11
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Suburban Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,392
I cant believe Im saying this, but after having to endure a LH in Y, Id be thrilled to be on a UA 752 in E+ , the more citys they fly them into the better the chances of a Saver Y being able to be had
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
w/o the 752 UAs map for its own metal flights TATL would look like AAs or USs , few and far in between
#12
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,454
The 757 has the lowest fixed costs of any transatlantic-capable airplane in the UA fleet and a better J:Y ratio for smaller or leisure-oriented markets. Its limitations, of course, are range, inability to carry containerized freight and premium cabin capacity. It's a good tool for the transatlantic arsenal, but suboptimal for many of the markets it was deployed to by CO out of necessity. As time goes on, we'll see more sCO 757s operating in other markets (like DEN-Hawaii, LIH and Latin America) where the 739ER lacks the performance to replace the 757 one-for-one.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: near to SFO and LHR
Programs: BA Gold, B6 Mosiac, VS, AA, DL (and a legacy UA 2MM)
Posts: 2,274
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
A lot of people on FT claim they couldn't possibly endure a narrowbody transoceanic flight, which is pretty funny because they were commonplace for decades, through 1980 or so. There's really no difference in individual comfort compared to the widebodies, and you get to circumvent big difficult hubs in Europe. CO opened secondary markets like BRS, BFS and EDI direct from EWR and, before EWR went totally to hell, it was a definite net positive to fly a 757 out of there to those small markets and avoid transiting LHR.
Last edited by BearX220; Jul 3, 2014 at 9:24 am Reason: Fix typo
#15
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,454
When was that? EWR has been hell for as long as I can remember!