A Warning Regarding Targeted Promotions
#62
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 472
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TimCLE:
Someone please get a strongly worded letter we all can MAIL in. Copy the bankruptcy judge, also. </font>
Someone please get a strongly worded letter we all can MAIL in. Copy the bankruptcy judge, also. </font>
B
#63
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Greensboro, NC (US Air CP = Compassionate Proctology, Hilton Diamond)
Posts: 304
Just think, five years from now, young MBA's following in the footsteps of Isom and my pal Ben will be discussing a case study on all the ways one can poke their marketing fingers in the eyes of the customers to drive an airline out of business. You almost wonder if the dynamic duo hasn't shorted the stock. Jeeez, the only thing missing from the US Airways marketing plan is the pre-board enima.
#65
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 24
Last year I inquired about a double-miles code that a co-worker had passed on to me. The person I dealt with told me that I was not targeted for the offer, but she would go ahead and register me for it, retroactively.
Lawyers know better than I, but I think that must be some type of precedent that would have an impact on efforts to retract miles that have already been awarded.
Legal eagles?
Lawyers know better than I, but I think that must be some type of precedent that would have an impact on efforts to retract miles that have already been awarded.
Legal eagles?
#66
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BOS
Programs: AA LTG EXP, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,419
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by syzygy8:
i think avek00 is just about there.
B</font>
i think avek00 is just about there.
B</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">some of us are avid readers</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">do not condone the practice</font>
I suspect that a good case can be made that striping any miles received, or failing to grant them in the future for bonuses already signed up for could be shown to be a deliberate fraud on the part of US.
#67
Join Date: May 2002
Location: PHL USA; US Pref
Posts: 664
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Gregg:
[B]Did anyone notice how this all went down after the point you could still get decent fares 14 days out to make the Oct 31st deadline for the Get Out More and the 4/8/12 bonuses?
I wouldn't be surprised if US Air knew this was going on long ago and decided not to enforce it until after many of you spent plenty of your money earning miles using these bonuses.
Couldn't this crackdown have happened in July? August? September?
B]</font>
[B]Did anyone notice how this all went down after the point you could still get decent fares 14 days out to make the Oct 31st deadline for the Get Out More and the 4/8/12 bonuses?
I wouldn't be surprised if US Air knew this was going on long ago and decided not to enforce it until after many of you spent plenty of your money earning miles using these bonuses.
Couldn't this crackdown have happened in July? August? September?
B]</font>
#69
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,682
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by flyertalk:
Targeted promotions that are sent to Dividend Miles members or our partners via e-mail or direct mail, which generally require registration, cannot be earned by anyone except the original recipient of the e-mail or direct mail program. The terms and conditions of these promotions state that only the original recipient of the direct mail or e-mail program can qualify for the promotional offer. We always clearly state promotional terms and conditions associated with each Dividend Miles promotional offer.
</font>
Targeted promotions that are sent to Dividend Miles members or our partners via e-mail or direct mail, which generally require registration, cannot be earned by anyone except the original recipient of the e-mail or direct mail program. The terms and conditions of these promotions state that only the original recipient of the direct mail or e-mail program can qualify for the promotional offer. We always clearly state promotional terms and conditions associated with each Dividend Miles promotional offer.
</font>
#70
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 129
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by hscottm:
I hope they hurry up and make the negative adjustments soon - that way, I can re-register all the codes again. They surely wont have time to go in twice and gut our accounts! ;-)</font>
I hope they hurry up and make the negative adjustments soon - that way, I can re-register all the codes again. They surely wont have time to go in twice and gut our accounts! ;-)</font>
#73
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BOS
Programs: AA LTG EXP, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,419
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by hindukid:
Therefore the only terms applicable would be the ones diplayed over their phone regisration system. Did they mention that it was for targetted cutomers onlyon the phone, I think not</font>
Therefore the only terms applicable would be the ones diplayed over their phone regisration system. Did they mention that it was for targetted cutomers onlyon the phone, I think not</font>
#74
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: US Chairman's Preferred, Intercontinental Platinum
Posts: 983
It is incumbent upon the supplier to manage his product and promotions.
USAirways allowed us (targeted and non-targeted) to register and receive these promotional bonuses. They did have the right to reject our registration, but choose to accept it. We paid for their product, based upon the acceptance of our promotional registration.
As all of us know, a major component of our choice to fly USAirways were the bonus miles. It is obvious that they waited until the end of the promotional period to pull the rug out from under this so that they could maximize their revenue from "non-targeted flyers".
You don't have to be a Legal Beagle to understand the potential for fraud here. Yes, they can take away my DMiles, but I want monetary compensation for the fares that I paid for these flights. Bait and Switch is an age old practice.
USAirways allowed us (targeted and non-targeted) to register and receive these promotional bonuses. They did have the right to reject our registration, but choose to accept it. We paid for their product, based upon the acceptance of our promotional registration.
As all of us know, a major component of our choice to fly USAirways were the bonus miles. It is obvious that they waited until the end of the promotional period to pull the rug out from under this so that they could maximize their revenue from "non-targeted flyers".
You don't have to be a Legal Beagle to understand the potential for fraud here. Yes, they can take away my DMiles, but I want monetary compensation for the fares that I paid for these flights. Bait and Switch is an age old practice.
#75
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: mystic island, nj, USA
Posts: 2,377
Where I grew up we had an old saying regarding poor performance from a vendor -
"Don't B*tch! SWITCH!" Get it! Got it! GOOD!
I don't need the grief! But i do love a good fight! I have been faxing them copies of my reciepts from other airlines since the tier miles debacle and it seems to be suffiecently annoying enough that I have recieved a phone call from Consumer Affairs who let me vent for a good half hour! I like to remind them of the revenue they have lost to date as a result of their decisions! They are IMHO feeling the heat! It's just not hot enough! YET! We need to discuss turning up the heat! Forwarding a copy of ALL Correspondence to the BK judge seems like a plan, anyone know if it will help?
"Don't B*tch! SWITCH!" Get it! Got it! GOOD!
I don't need the grief! But i do love a good fight! I have been faxing them copies of my reciepts from other airlines since the tier miles debacle and it seems to be suffiecently annoying enough that I have recieved a phone call from Consumer Affairs who let me vent for a good half hour! I like to remind them of the revenue they have lost to date as a result of their decisions! They are IMHO feeling the heat! It's just not hot enough! YET! We need to discuss turning up the heat! Forwarding a copy of ALL Correspondence to the BK judge seems like a plan, anyone know if it will help?