Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Acceptable Comp for Improper Processing of Standby?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Acceptable Comp for Improper Processing of Standby?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:46 pm
  #46  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: UA, Starwood, Priority Club, Hertz, Starbucks Gold Card
Posts: 4,007
Originally Posted by shazbot
As for the 24hour overnight delay vs. my 10hr overnight delay, is time the only criteria for 'inconvenience'? They were vacationing to SYD. I got 4 hours of sleep, missed my morning client meeting, and am now going to miss my afternoon meeting b/c UA also lost my bag in all of this. So yes... who's really more inconvenienced? Vacationers that could've slept for 10 hours & hung out in SF, or someone thats now going to miss 2 client meetings?
OT, but for the sake of making your next day appointments, book the nonstop even if it may cost more, and especially when both options are scheduled around the same time. It ended up costing you more in this case but you really did set yourself up for the situation.
sinoflyer is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:49 pm
  #47  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by emanon256
You brought it up.
No, 'priority' is the underlining issue, and I illustrated that everyone has different priorities, and there is no objective measure for what is 'higher,' which is why status should be factored in.
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:50 pm
  #48  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IAD, BOS, PVD
Programs: UA, US, AS, Marriott, Radisson, Hilton
Posts: 7,203
Originally Posted by shazbot
What's the point of being 1K if vacation or length of delay takes priority?
What's the point of being a human being. When you take your business elsewhere,
I and United will salute you.
violist is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:51 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 351
Originally Posted by uapremier
Unfortunately (and probably very distressing to you) the agent was correct.
International travel--particularly missed connections go on the standby list as
BP5A which trumps any normal standby on the BP5B list. The 5B list is typically the status based list that we all refer to, but in this case United standby boarding priority was adhered to correctly and the GM members were placed on the higher than you on the 5A list.
Dug from the archives, the complete list. The passengers in question could have been full fare F or C, or "disserviced" whatever that means.
I couldn't find the priority boarding codes in any recent posts here. I spied a list recently, so here goes. It's divided into two sections, the first (priorities 1-4) for customers with reservations, and the second (priorities 5-10) for customers without reservations.

BP1-A Full fare revenue pax; company officers
BP1-B Priority flight crew
BP1-C FAA inspectors

BP2 Other than full-fare revenue (meaning rev pax at discount fares)
BP3 UA business travel / UA emergency travel, outbound (going to the place of business or the place of emergency)
BP4 Other airline business travel; travel agent "POSS SPACE" (positive space?)

BP5A Disserviced and full fare F and C pax
BP5B All other revenue standbys
BP5C Non-revenue positive space standbys
BP5H Shuttle revenue and positive space

BP6A UA emergency travel (returning); other airline emergency travel (going)
BP6B UA retirees or spouse or child 25 or under with 25 years of service or more
ALSO parents accompanied by retiree with 25+ years of service
ALSO UA employees and "eligibles" traveling on 1/4 fare
ALSO Retirees with less than 25 years of service who are traveling on 1/4 fare

BP7 UA business travel on space available (i.e., standing by, not on confirmed space)

BP8A UA employee/spouse/dependent child 22 or younger, or accompanied child age 22-25 on pleasure travel
ALSO UA employee plus one companion, or parents who are traveling with the employee
ALSO parents traveling with retiree who has less than 25 years of service
ALSO retirees/spouses/dependent child 22 or younger, or accompanied child 22-25, with less than 25 years of service, on pleasure travel
ALSO retirees and eligibles with 25+ years of service, on international travel
ALSO United Express employees on space-available business travel, by seniority

BP8D United Express retirees' dependent child 22-25, unaccompanied
ALSO UA employees plus *two* companions, or unaccompanied parents
ALSO parents of retirees traveling alone
BP8C Companions traveling alone (I may have noted this out of order.)
BP9 United Express employees on "1090" (?); travel agent employees; travel agents traveling on United Express (am not sure I translated this correctly)
BP10 Employees of other airlines
Mark_K is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:52 pm
  #50  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
40 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
Originally Posted by shazbot
No, 'priority' is the underlining issue, and I illustrated that everyone has different priorities, and there is no objective measure for what is 'higher,' which is why status should be factored in.
Go.


Read.


Post.


13.


(Again, if necessary.)
pinniped is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:53 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: Recovering after 7 years of UA 1K, Still UA Silver (Which means nothing), Marriott Lifetime Plat Pre
Posts: 1,950
Originally Posted by shazbot
No, 'priority' is the underlining issue, and I illustrated that everyone has different priorities, and there is no objective measure for what is 'higher,' which is why status should be factored in.
And the issue of Priority as that you were #1 on the wait list. The other PAX were never on the wait list.

Its PAX like the OP that make me glad I am no longer in customer service.
emanon256 is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:02 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1P, Omni Gold, Hilton Gold, *Wood Gold
Posts: 1,208
It sounds like you had a checked bag. I did not even think you could go standby when checking bags. Is this waived for 1Ks?
jneugeba is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:03 pm
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by shazbot
No, 'priority' is the underlining issue, and I illustrated that everyone has different priorities, and there is no objective measure for what is 'higher,' which is why status should be factored in.
they were not on standby. period.

Sounds like you need to invest in a netjet or something since your you time is so important that no one else matters.
Steph3n is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:04 pm
  #54  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by emanon256
And the issue of Priority as that you were #1 on the wait list. The other PAX were never on the wait list.

Its PAX like the OP that make me glad I am no longer in customer service.
So basically the SEA agent screwed up and confirmed those 4 when they should have gone on the standby list as Y was oversold and they should not have been confirmed as that is against procedure.

Originally Posted by Steph3n
they were not on standby. period.

Sounds like you need to invest in a netjet or something since your you time is so important that no one else matters.
Yes. And by UA procedure, they _should_ have been on standby. Therefore, the agent went around UA procedures, and confirmed them in a situation where they should have been on standby. I.e. UA screwed up.

Last edited by iluv2fly; May 5, 2009 at 3:06 pm Reason: merge
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:05 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by shazbot
So basically the SEA agent screwed up and confirmed those 4 when they should have gone on the standby list as Y was oversold and they should not have been confirmed as that is against procedure.
Not exactly.
Steph3n is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:09 pm
  #56  
2M
50 Countries Visited
80 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GA
Programs: VA-SLV, QF-GLD, DL-PM, UA-ex1K, AA-exPLT, HH-DM, IHG-PLT, MR-GLD
Posts: 8,353
UA's procedure is to oversell flights if deemed necessary. You are wrong.
CPMaverick is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:09 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: EWR and SAN
Programs: PWP Direktor of Homeland, CO Plat* 1MM,UA 1K,BD Gold,DL Gold,SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 7,551
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
One would be wrong.
And i'm ok with being wrong. In the end, gate agents have the ultimate call as they should.

Originally Posted by emanon256
Actually, after re-reading the OP, the 4 PAX were not even on the standby list. They were transfered to this flight. So there was space available, that the OP was waiting for on standby. The other PAX were then re-ticket onto the flight, and the GA asked that the 4 pax not be IVDBd. Then no standby space was available for the OP. So basically, the OP was standby, and other PAX were confirmed for the flight, making the Sort Order moot.
very good point. If the flight was full when the OP tried to get on it and the other four passengers got on, it's possible that the other agent opened up space or it's also possible they were already confirmed before he got there. We really don't know and anything else is speculation. But, being that they did have confirmed seats (even if it's by an agent opening up availability) then the OP was indeed the only person on the Standby list and not disserviced.

Originally Posted by emcampbe
The fact is - UA could have had four pax that would have required overnight stays in SFO/LAX and a full 24-hour delay vs. 1 who possibly had to stay in SFO and a few hour delay. Had the OP been proactive, after the flight closed, they should have requested to be put on another carrier. Everytime delays have caused me to miss my last connection, I have always called and asked to be routed on another carrier. As a 2P, i have never once been denied, and the cause has always been delays due to WX or ATC. While it is possible, as UA can be inconsistent, I would think chances are good that a 1K wouldn't have much trouble getting the same.
And that is the right thing to do. I do the same. I've learned that if you're helpful and offer suggestions, they will generally help you get your request.


Originally Posted by emcampbe
How would this have averted "a situation?" Sure, it would have averted the OP's situation, but the situation of the 4 stuck GM's would have been worse. UA made the right call here.
Originally Posted by Ripper3785
I think fozz meant having the GA ask for 1 other pax to VDB, not one of the 4 pax.
That's exactly what I was saying.

Originally Posted by emanon256
But why should they ask a confirmed PAX to VDB, so someone on the standby list can go. That makes no sense. They were not over booked.
And you're correct, the part I missed was that the other four folks weren't standby and were confirmed. There is a difference.

It sucks for the OP that UA opened up seats for the other four folks but not them, but it's the luck of the draw and it was the right thing to do. Stranding four people in SFO for 24 hours vs one person for 8 should be a no-brainer to anyone.

As for the VDB, what I was saying is that if UA knew he would misconnect, they should have considered VDB'ing someone else on the LAX flight to get the OP to their destination.
fozz is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:15 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 5,812
Not going to pile on the OP as that's been taken care in most of the posts above. Actually think the OP has some valid points.

One question (not sure if it was covered)-

OP, sounds like your time is very, very, very valuable, , Why did you not book (and pay the premium for) the nonstop?
CloudsBelow is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:17 pm
  #59  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by CloudsBelow
Not going to pile on the OP as that's been taken care in most of the posts above. Actually think the OP has some valid points.

One question (not sure if it was covered)-

OP, sounds like your time is very, very, very valuable, , Why did you not book (and pay the premium for) the nonstop?
Yea... I was doing a multi-city itin and when you do that, you have to pick all the flights first before you get to see a $, and I wasn't going to go through the 200 permutations to check out prices, so I just clicked on "price" and picked an itin from there.
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 1:21 pm
  #60  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by pinniped
Go.


Read.


Post.


13.


(Again, if necessary.)
Do you mean this?

BP5A Disserviced and full fare F and C pax
BP5B All other revenue standbys
BP5C Non-revenue positive space standbys
BP5H Shuttle revenue and positive space

which doesn't have a single mention of Int'l vs. Domestic? And btw, #13 is incorrect. Missed int'l connection doesn't automatically qualify you as a disserviced pax.

Originally Posted by CPMaverick
UA's procedure is to oversell flights if deemed necessary. You are wrong.
Its not overselling flights. Its confirming people on a re-route when that re-route is already at Y0. The general policy in this case is that you are on the standby list, and the agent does not confirm you into Y.

Last edited by iluv2fly; May 5, 2009 at 3:07 pm Reason: merge
shazbot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.