Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Acceptable Comp for Improper Processing of Standby?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Acceptable Comp for Improper Processing of Standby?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:01 pm
  #31  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: UA, Starwood, Priority Club, Hertz, Starbucks Gold Card
Posts: 4,007
Just to clarify the situation. The 4 SYD pax were not standbys. They were transferred over as confirmed pax. OP was and remained #1 on the standby list, as BP5B. Too bad the flight went out full, but about the only issue here is a case of bruised ego.
sinoflyer is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:07 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by shazbot
So this is the problem. I was trying to get confirmed into SEA-LAX direct, but told that Y was full, and that I had to go on standby list and wait to clear. All the meanwhile, another CSR goes ahead and confirms her 4 pax into SEA-LAX outside of the standby window, thereby effectively taking status and everything else out of the equation.
good, you were not entitled to those seats by being a 1K.
Steph3n is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:08 pm
  #33  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
40 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
Doesn't UA help 1K's out with hotel accommodations on overnight misconnects, regardless of cause? (That is, they don't play the "weather" card and tell you to beat it...) I thought I read this somewhere in the Wiki or FAQ thread here.

In any case, overnighting at SFO probably inconveniences you by a couple of actual waking hours at most, considering how many SFO-LAX flights there are every day. I'm glad UA took care of the four Sydney pax - I would hope that if I'm ever in that same situation, a quick-thinking CSR would get me taken care of and save me a full day of travel.

I had one case last year where I misconnected to the final ORD-LHR flight of the day. Snowstorm in Chicago...UA wasn't obligated to do much for me. Fortunately, I had a good agent on the phone: she said "Start heading towards T5 and look for SAS. I will work on your ticket." In that span of 10 minutes, she managed to get me onto an SAS flight minutes before the door closed and I made it to London three hours late (via Copenhagen) instead of a full day late. ^

So clearly, they do sometimes recognize that missing a long-haul international flight is a pain, and they try to rectify it when they can.
pinniped is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:09 pm
  #34  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by shazbot
Umm, I wouldn't be bringing the issue up had I not had an overnight delay. As it stands, EVERYONE involved was going to be stranded overnight, and yes, I spent the night at the lovely Red Roof Inn SFO...

As for the 24hour overnight delay vs. my 10hr overnight delay, is time the only criteria for 'inconvenience'? They were vacationing to SYD. I got 4 hours of sleep, missed my morning client meeting, and am now going to miss my afternoon meeting b/c UA also lost my bag in all of this. So yes... who's really more inconvenienced? Vacationers that could've slept for 10 hours & hung out in SF, or someone thats now going to miss 2 client meetings?
did you ask about rerouting on AS either to LA directly or to SFO? This has happened to me *many* times on UA when leaving SEA or PDX when a flight is delayed, and I've always gotten a reroute. It's great because I usually get a nonstop to wherever I'm going versus the connecting flight I had booked on UA. Once, I even was on a plane and got off and got re-ticketed right there. Once (cancelled/mechanical), I got rebooked on AS w/o even calling. But i have *never* been said no to at PDX when asked for a reroute on AS for weather delays. The UA agents at pdx are not nice to me, but a little pleading always got me to my final destination, and oftne times earlier than my scheduled arrival.
flyboiboeing is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:24 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: Recovering after 7 years of UA 1K, Still UA Silver (Which means nothing), Marriott Lifetime Plat Pre
Posts: 1,950
Originally Posted by shazbot
As for the 24hour overnight delay vs. my 10hr overnight delay, is time the only criteria for 'inconvenience'? They were vacationing to SYD. I got 4 hours of sleep, missed my morning client meeting, and am now going to miss my afternoon meeting b/c UA also lost my bag in all of this. So yes... who's really more inconvenienced? Vacationers that could've slept for 10 hours & hung out in SF, or someone thats now going to miss 2 client meetings?
Wow!

I for one would rather re-schedule with a client and be inconvenienced work wise, than miss a part of my vacation. Did they say they were going on vacation, or is this an assumption? They could have been going for a special surgery, or to visit a relative before they died.

Seriously, assuming it is a vacation, Missing a vacation that people save up for and are going on to relax is quite serous. 4 PAX being stranded for 24 hours. That is a big deal. Not to mention, assuming they were on vacation, they probably have non-refundable hotels, etc. And clients are for more understanding of travel delays due to weather than hotels in another country.


Whenever I have been stranded overnight due to WX, I have always been put up on an Inter Continental or Sheridan by UA. Never a Red Roof Inn.
emanon256 is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:27 pm
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,215
Originally Posted by shazbot
who's really more inconvenienced? Vacationers that could've slept for 10 hours & hung out in SF, or someone thats now going to miss 2 client meetings?
You don't want to know the answer, because it's certainly not you.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:27 pm
  #37  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by Steph3n
good, you were not entitled to those seats by being a 1K.
That doesn't make any sense. Basically, you're saying that I got screwed b/c I got an agent that wasn't willing to bend the rules and confirm me outside of the 20min window b/c the flight was oversold, whereas another agent was.

And to be clear, that other agent confirmed them when they didn't have the inventory. They only had 3 seats available when she confirmed all 4, and ended up waiting for a no-show to get the 4th on.
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:31 pm
  #38  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
40 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
Wow...I fast-forwarded and missed that post about the 4 vacationing in SYD.

That changes things a bit for me. If the five of us had been standing there at the gate and there were 4 seats available, I would have insisted that UA make sure to overlook my 1K status and get them to Australia as fast as possible - figure me out after they're onboard and on their way. I'll make phone calls and reset my meetings...clients are generally understandable about weather delays because they've been there too. I'd hate to see four people lose a day of vacation because of a misconnect.

Priorities? Easy call. Theirs > Yours. By far. Again, I'm glad UA got it right.
pinniped is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:32 pm
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by emanon256
Wow!

I for one would rather re-schedule with a client and be inconvenienced work wise, than miss a part of my vacation. Did they say they were going on vacation, or is this an assumption? They could have been going for a special surgery, or to visit a relative before they died.

Seriously, assuming it is a vacation, Missing a vacation that people save up for and are going on to relax is quite serous. 4 PAX being stranded for 24 hours. That is a big deal. Not to mention, assuming they were on vacation, they probably have non-refundable hotels, etc. And clients are for more understanding of travel delays due to weather than hotels in another country.


Whenever I have been stranded overnight due to WX, I have always been put up on an Inter Continental or Sheridan by UA. Never a Red Roof Inn.
What's the point of being 1K if vacation or length of delay takes priority? Is not a main value for status the ability to get to point A by time Y during irreg ops? Otherwise, why not just fly southwest?
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:35 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: retired from SFO Terminal 3
Posts: 7,437
Originally Posted by shazbot
What's the point of being 1K if vacation or length of delay takes priority? Is not a main value for status the ability to get to point A by time Y during irreg ops? Otherwise, why not just fly southwest?
Why are you a 1K? Do you like shoving your status in other people's faces, just so that you can make a business meeting? I'm sure you have canceled a few of those in your life time for dumb reasons.
sfogate is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:35 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: Recovering after 7 years of UA 1K, Still UA Silver (Which means nothing), Marriott Lifetime Plat Pre
Posts: 1,950
Originally Posted by shazbot
What's the point of being 1K if vacation or length of delay takes priority? Is not a main value for status the ability to get to point A by time Y during irreg ops? Otherwise, why not just fly southwest?
That has nothing to do with status. Some things just come first. Sounds like southwest may be the way for you to go.
emanon256 is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:36 pm
  #42  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Plat
Posts: 384
Originally Posted by pinniped
Wow...I fast-forwarded and missed that post about the 4 vacationing in SYD.

That changes things a bit for me. If the five of us had been standing there at the gate and there were 4 seats available, I would have insisted that UA make sure to overlook my 1K status and get them to Australia as fast as possible - figure me out after they're onboard and on their way. I'll make phone calls and reset my meetings...clients are generally understandable about weather delays because they've been there too. I'd hate to see four people lose a day of vacation because of a misconnect.

Priorities? Easy call. Theirs > Yours. By far. Again, I'm glad UA got it right.
What about the other SYD bound passengers waiting in line with me at CSC? Should they have DB'd other passengers for them? This whole talk of 'priority' is skewed. You may value vacation as the priority, but I value my work as a priority. Who's more important? There's no objective answer, and so that's why status should matter and be a factor.

Originally Posted by sfogate
Why are you a 1K? Do you like shoving your status in other people's faces, just so that you can make a business meeting? I'm sure you have canceled a few of those in your life time for dumb reasons.
No, but the value of status is during irreg ops. Otherwise, its all the same. Board first, board last, who cares if you don't need overhead space. The whole reason for maintaining 1K is so that I can get home on thursday nights when ORD is starting to get shut down. Or making that SEA-LAX flight when there's a misconnect in SFO.

Originally Posted by emanon256
That has nothing to do with status. Some things just come first. Sounds like southwest may be the way for you to go.
Again, what is the objective measure for 'first'? You value vacation, I value work. The entire point of this post is I was under the impression that 1K was 'first'. If there is a UA policy that states Int'l mis-connects takes priority over Domestic mis-connects, even when both would result in overnight stays, then fine. That's their policy, and the objective measure for 'first.' All this b.s. talk of vacation vs. work is all subjective and really pointless.

Last edited by iluv2fly; May 5, 2009 at 3:03 pm Reason: merge
shazbot is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:42 pm
  #43  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
40 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
Originally Posted by shazbot
What about the other SYD bound passengers waiting in line with me at CSC? Should they have DB'd other passengers for them? This whole talk of 'priority' is skewed. You may value vacation as the priority, but I value my work as a priority. Who's more important? There's no objective answer, and so that's why status should matter and be a factor.
This does not appear to be a case where UA IDB'ed anyone on the SFO-LAX flight. You failed to make a standby list and now you're whinging about it. Nobody's talking about a DB situation (whether V or I).

What should matter? Common sense and human decency are what matters. Four people on a full day delay. You showing up in LA by midmorning instead of late night...a delay of 2 or3 waking hours.

Even my five-year-old would understand this.
pinniped is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:42 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: Recovering after 7 years of UA 1K, Still UA Silver (Which means nothing), Marriott Lifetime Plat Pre
Posts: 1,950
In my experience, in IrOps, all bets are off and Status may get perks like a free hotel, but not much else when tehere are IrOps.

Status gets things like, boarding priority, exit rows, E+, upgrades, shorter lines, etc.
emanon256 is offline  
Old May 5, 2009 | 12:45 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: Recovering after 7 years of UA 1K, Still UA Silver (Which means nothing), Marriott Lifetime Plat Pre
Posts: 1,950
Originally Posted by shazbot
All this b.s. talk of vacation vs. work is all subjective and really pointless.
You brought it up.

Originally Posted by shazbot
So yes... who's really more inconvenienced? Vacationers that could've slept for 10 hours & hung out in SF, or someone thats now going to miss 2 client meetings?

Last edited by emanon256; May 5, 2009 at 12:49 pm Reason: Added second quote
emanon256 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.