Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

767-300 WW 2 E+ vs. "regular" E+?

Register
Community
Wiki Posts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory

767-300 WW 2 E+ vs. "regular" E+?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 9:20 pm
  #1  
unavaca
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,868
767-300 WW 2 E+ vs. "regular" E+?
Over on Seatguru, they list the 763 WW 2 with "111 degrees of recline." Is that any different than regular E+ or are they being more verbose with the status quo?

http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Uni..._767-300_B.php

Trying to decide if it's worth upgrading SFO-IAD-EZE for 30k miles. (It is 30k, right? Or do I have to upgrade the SFO-IAD and IAD-EZE legs separately?)
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 9:30 pm
  #2  
mahasamatman
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,213
Originally Posted by unavaca
Is that any different than regular E+ or are they being more verbose with the status quo?
There's no difference. UA did not touch the Y cabin in the 767 conversions. Of course, there's only one "old" 767 flying, so there's very little chance of getting it.

Originally Posted by unavaca
Trying to decide if it's worth upgrading SFO-IAD-EZE for 30k miles.
Absolutely.

Originally Posted by unavaca
(It is 30k, right? Or do I have to upgrade the SFO-IAD and IAD-EZE legs separately?)
One upgrade will cover both segments.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 9:31 pm
  #3  
jan_az
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix
Programs: UA1k;HH Gold;MR Gold
Posts: 6,112
Originally Posted by unavaca
Over on Seatguru, they list the 763 WW 2 with "111 degrees of recline." Is that any different than regular E+ or are they being more verbose with the status quo?

http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Uni..._767-300_B.php

Trying to decide if it's worth upgrading SFO-IAD-EZE for 30k miles. (It is 30k, right? Or do I have to upgrade the SFO-IAD and IAD-EZE legs separately?)
.

You dont "upgrade to E+ " . I took the 767 in E+ from IAD-FCO - seemed like E+ to me
jan_az is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 9:32 pm
  #4  
unavaca
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,868
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
There's no difference. UA did not touch the Y cabin in the 767 conversions. Of course, there's only one "old" 767 flying, so there's very little chance of getting it.
The Suite Dreams site (http://www.suitedreams.united.com/) is saying only 18 of 21 767s have been upgraded. Is that out of date?

One upgrade will cover both segments.
Cool, thanks. Is there generally any preference to upgrading the inbound vs outbound to/from EZE?
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 9:33 pm
  #5  
mahasamatman
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,213
Originally Posted by unavaca
The Suite Dreams site (http://www.suitedreams.united.com/) is saying only 18 of 21 767s have been upgraded. Is that out of date?
Yes. See http://flyerguide.com/wiki/index.php...nversions_(UA) for current info.
mahasamatman is offline  



Advanced Search
Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.