Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Why does profitable UA cut to bone, while AA adds??

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why does profitable UA cut to bone, while AA adds??

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 12:03 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Programs: US Airways,Hilton HHonors, Marriott, National
Posts: 1,341
Oh do not even joke!! US is worse or same as E- on most flights. They still say "Generous 31" pitch in coach". And they are stripping their A330 from 34" pitch to 31" pitch for INTERNATIONAL COACH.. can you say LH pitch

I do fly UA internationally over US.. and SQ or VS over US or any US airliner.

Thank God for Ted, cause you could be flying mainline US.
LAX1K to AmWest is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 12:11 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA, AA
Posts: 4,039
Originally Posted by LAX1K to AmWest
Thank God for Ted, cause you could be flying mainline US.
I'd rather be in US mainline F than explus F or Ted E+.
rar indeed is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 4:32 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
Originally Posted by UrbaneGent
That is also a concern of mine and you see it all the time on the flights. The new outfitting of the seats isn't doesn't necessarily mean United must come up with the cash up-front. There are so many deals made. Just like when people complained about the repainting of the United livery, when they were in bankruptcy.

They planes had to be repainted, only they were repainted to be cheaper. If you look at the new "First" suite, the actual seats look like the old ones, don't they? I'm nervous they are going to use the old seats and put new cushion on them....

UG
The new seats are just that, new.
planemechanic is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 6:51 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,973
Originally Posted by UNITED959
Not making excuses for UA, but they are prepping to refit 97 aircraft with new First and Business class seating. That requires a few nickels.
I think it is related, too. When they introduce the new seating in F & C, they will bring back some of the things they cut to make the new product seem even more impressive by comparison. If I was just a little less cynical, I'd think they are going to even add a few bells & whistles...
qasr is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 7:05 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: BAGold; AA3MMPlat; UA1MMGold; FBGold; MarriottAmb; AccorPlat; HHGold; ICPlatAmb; HyattDiscoverist
Posts: 4,378
Having recently flown AA several times, I'm not sure I buy into the comparison, at least as far as domestic is concerned. I haven't seen any snacks in Y on AA, I've only seen pillows occasionally in F, and those dirty red blankets are in Y far fewer and farther between than on any UA flight I can remember.
rfrost is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 7:34 am
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23,999
Just curious: UA cut fruit plates on Asian flights? When was this announced, and what exactly does this entail?

I see where the OP is coming from, but I would not say that AA is getting better either, for the most part. They also cut snacks in Y, like UA, as well as some other things. Heck, IIRC they don't even have pillows in Y domestically (not that any FT'er would use those horridly dirty specimens).
lucky9876coins is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 7:54 am
  #22  
par
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Programs: UA 2K GS, SQ PPS, AA Ruby, NW Gold, Hertz Gold, Hyatt Gold, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 618
Originally Posted by blueman2
The real issue is whether they are cutting so much that people will start to go to other airlines. If passengers do not leave, then UA is doing the right thing for its shareholders. If passengers start to leave, then I am sure they will reverse their thinking.

UA is by no means out of the woods yet. Their cost structure (mostly salaries) remains a bit high.
so i guess it's fair to say that we are paying for the salaries with our lunches and breakfasts?
par is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 8:50 am
  #23  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: AA EXP UA 2KMM AMB
Posts: 2,415
Originally Posted by unitedbusiness
On the flipside, AA has continually added to its on-board service in recent months, as part of its Invest to Impress plan (including a hot breakfast in C from the US to Europe, new C entrees, savory mints, new cocktail snacks, pre-arrival sparkling water with fruit garnish, Ghirardelli chocolates, among others).
Sorry, but if some of these things listed here will entail future enhancements on UA's on-board service, I will not be seriously impressed. I could care less for chocolate, mints and water with garnish. Focus on 'real' improvements. Get your upcoming C seats right to begin with (flat). Sustain the current sizes and quality of main entrees/salad/dessert to their former glory (no more countable wilted lettuce pretending to be salad please). And with your upcoming new premium seats, focus on service, so that it will be consistently good. No amount of Ghirardelli chocolates can hide mediocre service.

Focus on 'real' improvements.

Last edited by jef7; Feb 12, 2007 at 1:11 pm
jef7 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 10:16 am
  #24  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
40 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,012
I don't know...AA used to be the premium product, with MRTC in the back of the bus and the highest spend per passenger on food/bev among U.S. carriers in premium cabins. In my admittedly limited experience, they have slashed service in premium cabins in recent years and pulled MRTC altogether.

At least United has remained steadfast with E+ to the point where they continue to speak well of it to investors as being a profitable feature. And UA is about to retrofit many J/F seats, so I don't think all is lost.

Certainly don't want to see them cut anything out - and I'd love to see the "small touches" because they've been so sorely lacking for so long - but we should keep it in perspective. I will have 2 transatlantic J trips later this year, and they will probably both be on UA metal. I don't perceive AA as having a significantly better product. (If we were talking about non-U.S. carriers, it might be a different discussion.)
pinniped is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 12:06 pm
  #25  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA - 1K 1MM; Hyatt - Explorist; Marriott - Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,587
As much as I'd like to see UA continually improve amenities, what do you think the shareholders (i.e. owners) would like to see. Profit in their pockets or more chocolate squares and bags of snack mix on tray tables?

We live in a quarter to quarter world and public companies don't really have the luxury of thinking much farther ahead than that. I'm sure someone at UA is balancing the ratio of what amenities need to be provided before enough travelers stop flying UA to decrease profits. Obviously, they've been doing a pretty good job the past 2 quarters. Unfortunately, airline travel is going to become more and more like riding the bus.
vandalby is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 12:45 pm
  #26  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 1K MM (sob...former GS), Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 237
Originally Posted by pinniped
I don't know...AA used to be the premium product, with MRTC in the back of the bus and the highest spend per passenger on food/bev among U.S. carriers in premium cabins. In my admittedly limited experience, they have slashed service in premium cabins in recent years and pulled MRTC altogether.

At least United has remained steadfast with E+ to the point where they continue to speak well of it to investors as being a profitable feature. And UA is about to retrofit many J/F seats, so I don't think all is lost.

Certainly don't want to see them cut anything out - and I'd love to see the "small touches" because they've been so sorely lacking for so long - but we should keep it in perspective. I will have 2 transatlantic J trips later this year, and they will probably both be on UA metal. I don't perceive AA as having a significantly better product. (If we were talking about non-U.S. carriers, it might be a different discussion.)
I think you are right, pinniped - I recall many threads on the AA forum starting about 2-3 years ago bemoaning the cuts in services taking place. Good for AA to be adding some back, of course...I hope qasr was correct and UA is waiting for the new J/F seat unveiling to bring back many of the "enhancements" we've come to expect and love.

Here's wishing the flash of new seats doesn't blind UA to the need for focus on their soft product...if I was a UGS I'd need to see serious commitment to that area to justify my continued spend. But hey - I'm just a 1P, so I can only dream of UGS.
DasKitty is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 1:38 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
60 Nights
Community Builder
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 28,777
I can give up food, even the faux food of pretzels, if I could just have some technology on my flights. UA used to excel in this area, but they have now fallen far behind.

Give me a power port and HSIA at my seat and you can even take away the drinks.

(Don't you touch Channel 9, though.)
DenverBrian is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.