Comprehensive List of Expected Changes/Lost Functionality when United Moves to SHARES
#46
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 17,970
I was in the GS room at ORD a few days ago. I was talking about some VDB vouchers I had and the agent said that they will no longer be able to ticket anything for us once SHARES is implemented.
#47
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN (MSP)
Programs: DL DM, UA 1K MM, Subway Club Member
Posts: 1,988
Loss of Bag Tracking with Move to SHARES
Spoke with a very friendly Service Director at DEN late last week about the transition to SHARES in early March. While much of the information she shared about her on-going training has already been discussed here a new bit came out that I hadn't heard yet and was hoping a resident UA staffer could comment.
She said that SHARES (or whatever the baggage subsystem is called) does not include any real-time bag tracking component and that they will stop scanning bags durring aircraft loading, unloading, and a bag-belt delivery when UA transitions to SHARES. As many of you know, UA is somewhat unique in that they scan a bag several times throughout the journey and maintain that scan history (similar to FedEx). This history and help resolve lost bag issues much more quickly and I imagine saves both UA and customers with displaced bags a lot of time and money. I think Delta has implemented the process (and even allows customers to follow along with their iPhones) but CO has not and the new UA will not.
My hope is that legacy UA agents and management will be able to attest to the significant inefficiencies once SHARES rolls out and over the years they'll get patched back to PMUA standards.
She said that SHARES (or whatever the baggage subsystem is called) does not include any real-time bag tracking component and that they will stop scanning bags durring aircraft loading, unloading, and a bag-belt delivery when UA transitions to SHARES. As many of you know, UA is somewhat unique in that they scan a bag several times throughout the journey and maintain that scan history (similar to FedEx). This history and help resolve lost bag issues much more quickly and I imagine saves both UA and customers with displaced bags a lot of time and money. I think Delta has implemented the process (and even allows customers to follow along with their iPhones) but CO has not and the new UA will not.
My hope is that legacy UA agents and management will be able to attest to the significant inefficiencies once SHARES rolls out and over the years they'll get patched back to PMUA standards.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
not really surprising, I guess we should just add it to the long list of stuff that SHARES can't do/or can't do easily that will end up costing UA far more money than had they paid for Apollo.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,686
They've announced they're going with SHARES for the PSS and CO's other web infrastructure for eCommerce.
As do I - very useful service. How you deemed that point relevant though is another story. You're talking about PMCO. We simply do not know what policies or technical procedures will be in place in the new airline. Without knowing these, the list that channa posted may as well be thrown in the rubbish - unless someone wants a historical guide of how PMCO operated in which case they can frame it for posterity. I'm certain that some of these will remain the same in the new airline - but channa certainly doesn't know which ones, nor do the rest of us.
One positive change under this assumption will be 24h SDC system-wide (at least domestic) rather than the current 3h/24h hodge-podge.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,166
#51
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
The default assumption should be no change; we'll be going ahead with the same as the legacy system. Some systems (million miler and elite qualification come to mind) have had policy changes announced.
One positive change under this assumption will be 24h SDC system-wide (at least domestic) rather than the current 3h/24h hodge-podge.
One positive change under this assumption will be 24h SDC system-wide (at least domestic) rather than the current 3h/24h hodge-podge.
The intent of the OP is clear - raise a bunch of points that neither he, nor anyone else can confirm or deny at this stage and phrase it as a helpful "warning" to PMUA FF members. Incredibly misleading at best - in my view it is downright deceptive. We simply do not know what policies will be in place going forward.
This was always possible on PMCO since SDC was made available. Longhaul routes too.
#52
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,155
I have a couple of customer service vouchers (appreciation) I would like to use in Q2 or Q3 - does your statement mean I'd need to ticket by mail (Detroit IIRC)?
#53
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN (MSP)
Programs: DL DM, UA 1K MM, Subway Club Member
Posts: 1,988
Ya, I thought about posting there but didn't want this discussion to get lost in a more general discussion (since many of the items on that list have discussion elsewhere).
You are right it should be added to the list.
Mods feel free to move if that's better for the forum.
You are right it should be added to the list.
Mods feel free to move if that's better for the forum.
#54
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,155
She said that SHARES (or whatever the baggage subsystem is called) does not include any real-time bag tracking component and that they will stop scanning bags durring aircraft loading, unloading, and a bag-belt delivery when UA transitions to SHARES. As many of you know, UA is somewhat unique in that they scan a bag several times throughout the journey and maintain that scan history (similar to FedEx). This history and help resolve lost bag issues much more quickly and I imagine saves both UA and customers with displaced bags a lot of time and money. I think Delta has implemented the process (and even allows customers to follow along with their iPhones) but CO has not and the new UA will not.
Big thumbs down (and another finger pointed up) to SMI/J and his cronies/hacks for this reduction.
#55
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DSM, BKK or anywhere with an airport
Programs: UA 2P, HH Gold
Posts: 1,018
I don't get it - this is all bad, yes? So why is the new UA using SHARES instead of the legacy UA system already in place? Its got to be something more than "its cheaper" . . .
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,067
Added functionality improvements and baggage sections.
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,067
Yowza -- added this to the list. Thanks for pointing this out.
I've always used the real-time baggage scanning to my benefit on both UA and DL. When I am forced to reroute (e.g., IRROPS), it's always reassuring to ask where my bag is.
For example, I checked a bag MIA-IAD-SFO a couple months ago, and I was auto-rebooked on a much later IAD-SFO when IAD-SFO cancelled. I switched to a better IAD-LAX-SFO, and when I landed, the 1K desk was able to tell me exactly what flight my bag travelled on (not with me, but beat me), so I could go down there and find it with certainty.
Similarly, on a recent DCA-JFK-SFO on DL, we took a delay DCA-JFK and barely made the connection. On arrival at SFO, I asked DL if my bag made it, and they verified it was scanned as loaded on the plane, so I knew to wait around for the carousel to start running.
I'm going to miss this functionality if we lose it.
I've always used the real-time baggage scanning to my benefit on both UA and DL. When I am forced to reroute (e.g., IRROPS), it's always reassuring to ask where my bag is.
For example, I checked a bag MIA-IAD-SFO a couple months ago, and I was auto-rebooked on a much later IAD-SFO when IAD-SFO cancelled. I switched to a better IAD-LAX-SFO, and when I landed, the 1K desk was able to tell me exactly what flight my bag travelled on (not with me, but beat me), so I could go down there and find it with certainty.
Similarly, on a recent DCA-JFK-SFO on DL, we took a delay DCA-JFK and barely made the connection. On arrival at SFO, I asked DL if my bag made it, and they verified it was scanned as loaded on the plane, so I knew to wait around for the carousel to start running.
I'm going to miss this functionality if we lose it.
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,907
Before everybody gets too upset, even the OP was asking for someone in CO to verify the information. This is only one person who talked to a Service Director at DEN. Nothing is verified. If does turn out to be correct is a huge step back and down but I would like it to be confirmed before getting all upset about it. And what is CO lost luggage rate compared to UA's. If it is statistically the same as UA's then what's the big deal. If it is really worse than UA and this information is correct then it is a big deal and should be looked at. But lets not jump to conclusions without facts.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,166
The intent of the OP is clear - raise a bunch of points that neither he, nor anyone else can confirm or deny at this stage and phrase it as a helpful "warning" to PMUA FF members. Incredibly misleading at best - in my view it is downright deceptive. We simply do not know what policies will be in place going forward.
"Policies" can go off in a number of different directions - we've seen many policy changes so far, too many to name. Those aren't too difficult to change (enforcement is another story).
"Systems" though seem to be pretty fixed for the near future - do you have any indication otherwise? It's silly to think that all these systems issues are going to change in the short term. Fact is, SHARES and it's seemingly less robust nature vs. UA's systems seem to be a downgrade overall, and until we're told otherwise, we're stuck with it.
It might be helpful to cite specific areas from the original post that you believe likely won't stay the same going forward.
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,067
Before everybody gets too upset, even the OP was asking for someone in CO to verify the information. This is only one person who talked to a Service Director at DEN. Nothing is verified. If does turn out to be correct is a huge step back and down but I would like it to be confirmed before getting all upset about it. And what is CO lost luggage rate compared to UA's. If it is statistically the same as UA's then what's the big deal. If it is really worse than UA and this information is correct then it is a big deal and should be looked at. But lets not jump to conclusions without facts.
The mishandle rates are not too far off (UA is slightly better than CO at the moment). The issue is more of a lack of information and certainty. If they're guessing and hoping your bag is on this flight vs. knowing for sure is the issue.
It's nice to know your bag didn't make it and you can file the report and not wait around for 45 minutes for the whole plane to dump its load of bags.