Pilots Locking Lavatory Door In Polaris
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,258
#17
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MFR
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,935
I hope people are reporting this when it happens.
#18
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 67,769
Unclear which case are an uncompliant lav or a commandeered lav? Really two different situations. But poor optics without clearer qualification.
#19
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, Total Wine & More Reserve
Posts: 4,761
That happens when there is a maintenance differal related to the lavatory, usually an inoperative smoke detector or something with the fire suppression system in the trash can.
The lavatory functions work normal, but without the fire/smoke related items the FAA has authorized it only for crew use only in those situations. We don’t like having that differed either and completely understand the inconvenience it causes.
The lavatory functions work normal, but without the fire/smoke related items the FAA has authorized it only for crew use only in those situations. We don’t like having that differed either and completely understand the inconvenience it causes.
That makes 100% sense - thank you! I thought about asking why you don't just make an announcement -- and then I realized all of the downstream carnage from that -- i.e. "We are flying a plane that doesn't meet standards -- what else isn't right" lol... Sometimes TMI is really TMI...
#20
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IAH/EWR-LGA/MIA
Programs: UA Global Services 3.2 MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite, AA Exec Plat, BA Gold
Posts: 2,576
I just can’t see UA blocking off one of only 2 lavs on a 34-passenger long-haul J flight just so pilots could “skip the line” once or twice during the flight. If that was the objective, couldn’t the crew just use a few carts to temporarily block off access to one of the lavs when the cockpit gives advance notice, just as they do on domestic narrow bodies? Or, as someone else suggested, just have the cockpit crew jump any queue.
Last edited by st530; Mar 1, 2024 at 7:22 pm
#21
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 866
Highly doubtful pilots blocked off a lav for the entire flight. Years ago there were 2 lavs at door 1 on the 764 so it was never an issue. Now PF pax also have PE pax using the 2 lavs at door 2, thats why pilots block 1 lav when rotating in/oit of the pit. Another fake story from that site.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 27,015
Highly doubtful pilots blocked off a lav for the entire flight. Years ago there were 2 lavs at door 1 on the 764 so it was never an issue. Now PF pax also have PE pax using the 2 lavs at door 2, thats why pilots block 1 lav when rotating in/oit of the pit. Another fake story from that site.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
The comments coming from pilots on that story are amazing.
Like this one:
Pilots are FLYING THE PLANE and are charged with your safety. Their schedule in flight is tight and regulated. They need access to the facility and should not have to wait because some entitled a-hole is holed up in the bathroom.
The story is true. The only BS is the "security" quip from the captain.
#23
Moderator: Trip Reports
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA GS-2MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 3,780
I would simply flip the cover when no one was looking. If someone wanted to bang on the door or flip the cover themselves while I was in there, good luck to them then
![Smilie](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#24
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 3,111
Yes, I have seen that also. And I don't recall an announcement of an inoperable lavatory.
I don't think this is the explanation most of the time. At least in my experience the blocked lav was the closest one to the cockpit.
I wish I could share your confidence in how pilots view passenger comfort. On the upper deck of the 747 there were West Coast based pilots who would block one off the first of two lavs for either the entire flight or the last two hours. I once questioned a pilot about it when he was in the back galley and he said it you don't like it take it up with United management. I had asked in a non-confrontational way but the pilot was not going to entertain any discussion of his action.
That happens when there is a maintenance differal related to the lavatory, usually an inoperative smoke detector or something with the fire suppression system in the trash can.
The lavatory functions work normal, but without the fire/smoke related items the FAA has authorized it only for crew use only in those situations. We don’t like having that differed either and completely understand the inconvenience it causes.
The lavatory functions work normal, but without the fire/smoke related items the FAA has authorized it only for crew use only in those situations. We don’t like having that differed either and completely understand the inconvenience it causes.
Highly doubtful pilots blocked off a lav for the entire flight. Years ago there were 2 lavs at door 1 on the 764 so it was never an issue. Now PF pax also have PE pax using the 2 lavs at door 2, thats why pilots block 1 lav when rotating in/oit of the pit. Another fake story from that site.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .59 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,597
Do not practice this on other passengers!
![EEK!](https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#27
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Programs: JAL Global Club & oneworld Sapphire, ANA SFC & Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 3,823
I'm probably crazy, but I pay attention to pax/lav ratios and sometimes base my seat selection on proximity to lavs. On my last SQ A380 flight, for example, I chose a seat in the rear J section on the right side because it's close to the 4 lavs between the 2 J sections and the single rear lav which is on the right side. If pilots started commandeering lavs for their exclusive use I'd be pissed. I also like to stay hydrated and want easy lav access.
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 57,279
So it is to me absolutely credible that the pilot simply commandeered the lav without regard for passenger experience.
#30
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BOS<>NYC<>BKK
Programs: UA 4.4MM LT-GS; AA1MM; Amtrak SE; MAR LT TITAN; PC Plat; HIL DIA; HYA GLOB
Posts: 4,445
Pay attention and you can figure out how to open the door. I had a Delta pilot try this stunt and I was kind of OK with it but it turns out their spouses were on the plane and so they got to use the pilot restroom. Oh, no game up! I not only unlocked the door and let people use it. I filed a complaint with Delta got miles for this stupid move
The Delta pilot i later asked about this admitted that it is not any kind of security measure. They just don’t want to have to wait because they’re so special.😂
The Delta pilot i later asked about this admitted that it is not any kind of security measure. They just don’t want to have to wait because they’re so special.😂