Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 32336588)
Correct.
It's nothing but theater. The airlines cannot stay in business allocating 28 square feet* of airplane to every passenger. They're reticent to admit this in the current environment, so they're taking these measures as a marketing step. The only way to fly whilst adhering to the CDC distancing guidelines is private. * 3 feet ✖️ πr² |
Originally Posted by bluedemon211
(Post 32336610)
Thanks jsloan, that was my feeling as well. UA needs every $ of revenue they can get right now, so they are not going to turn away a sale in the name of social distancing.
|
Originally Posted by Dyce
(Post 32337258)
2 things here... United have drastically cut future capacity (May-June) based on current demand. This has resulted in:
1) prices going up - cash or miles 2) loads going up for example, I’ve continued flying IAH-CMH-IAH during the past few weeks. This route is/was a direct flight 3+ times a day initially flights were cancelling left, right and center and the flights that did operate had ~10-pax (normally served by a 175) Eventually we were down to 1 flight most days with 17 passengers on my flight IAH-CMH on Monday. For my next flight in May there are no direct flights and I’ve been routed through ORD with much higher load on the ORD-IAH flight this is resulting / will result in less social distancing on planes where several ppl (of the 17 passengers on Monday I counted 5 without masks including a non rev pilot in FC) will have zero common courtesy & respect for others and not wear a face mask... So, I’m going to start driving it... 17 hours in the car isn’t fun, but at less than $100 each way for gas, and no risk from being in a Petri dish plane of ~75% capacity, to me it’s a better choice. i think ppl will start freaking out when the flights are over 50% full again (how comfortable would you be sitting next to someone without a mask occasionally coughing for 2 hours?). i don’t blame the airlines for matching supply to demand, but I think the net result is eventually going to be detrimental to getting ppl flying again this summer. i predict a LOT of ppl will resort to traditional family road trip vacations to visit relatives in other parts of the country this summer... I think we’ll soon have antibody tests. UA requiring masks now, I believe? |
Originally Posted by AirbusFan2B
(Post 32337300)
With wear and tear on the car, may be closer to $1,000 cost per trip. Depending on duration, a rental car may be better value.
I think we’ll soon have antibody tests. UA requiring masks now, I believe? https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/...body-test.html UA is requesting that you wear masks during the safety demonstration. They will make them available to passengers in May. Crew are required to wear masks. Passengers are not required to wear them at this time. "VOLUNTARY." |
Not sure what benefit the anti-body test availability gets me as it's still not known whether having antibodies will prevent you from getting it again (one would think it would, but nothing is certain at the moment). I think the implication is if you have the anti-bodies then you're good to resume 'normal living'. I hope so, but time will tell.
And no idea how you're getting close to $1000 in wear & tear on a 1200 mile trip - I'm not doing it in a Veyron! UA are planning on making masks available to passengers beginning in May - no requirement for ppl to actually wear them. |
Originally Posted by bluedemon211
(Post 32336573)
With the drastic reduction in capacity (in many cases only 1 non-stop between cities where there used to be as many as 5-6) the odds are those seats will be needed.
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 32336588)
It's nothing but theater. The airlines cannot stay in business allocating 28 square feet* of airplane to every passenger.
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 32336638)
Even a blocked middle seat is only about 20" of space from the nearest passenger. To meet CDC guidelines, UA would need to block nearly 90% of their narrowbody inventory -- basically, you could put two people every three rows, although you might need to stagger them on the 76-seaters.
Blocking middle seats on a low-LF flight is not that big of a deal because people wouldn't select middle seats anyway. I guess it opens up E+ to non-elites sooner if E- starts to fill up. |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 32339440)
Bolding mine: That’s assuming there is a meal ;)
They haven't suggested food stops then. |
Originally Posted by Weatherboy
(Post 32339511)
United requires passengers wear masks effective May 4.
They haven't suggested food stops then. |
UA to require face coverings for all passengers, effective May 4
Well, it's gone from unthinkable to inevitable to announced: https://hub.united.com/united-corona...ght-attendants
We will also make face coverings mandatory for all travelers and will be providing them for free to our customers starting May 4. Among US carriers, B6 started this, F9 followed, and UA, AA, and DL all appear to have followed suit today. No end date is listed. Presented without further comment in an effort to avoid going OMNI. |
Originally Posted by jsloan
(Post 32339596)
Well, it's gone from unthinkable to inevitable to announced: https://hub.united.com/united-corona...ght-attendants
Among US carriers, B6 started this, F9 followed, and UA, AA, and DL all appear to have followed suit today. No end date is listed. Presented without further comment in an effort to avoid going OMNI. |
Originally Posted by zombietooth
(Post 32339645)
I wear N95s whenever I appear in public now, not for my benefit, but to make others feel better. In my line of work, I am used to working in various kinds of respirators, so it's no big deal to me. I understand that if you are not used to them it can be disconcerting, but it is what it is and you are going to have to knuckle under if you want to fly.
https://nypost.com/2020/04/24/driver...ring-n95-mask/ |
Originally Posted by zombietooth
(Post 32339645)
I wear N95s whenever I appear in public now, not for my benefit, but to make others feel better.
|
Originally Posted by Jerseyguy
(Post 32339830)
Are N95s advisable for long periods such as flights? I am high risk and I certainly want to be safe but there are reports that a guy passed out after wearing one for awhile while driving.
https://nypost.com/2020/04/24/driver...ring-n95-mask/ On flights dating back to January/February 2020 I was on numerous long-haul flights where [almost] everyone was wearing masks (surgical, N95 up to P100) for the duration of the flight (with exception of meal & drink intake), as well as at the airports. That above article is a bit ridiculous, and I wouldn't worry about it. Besides, how could they possibly know he didn't just fall asleep behind the wheel as has been a common occurrence since the invention of the motor vehicle! Flying with UA whilst wearing a mask should cause no serious issues, although a slight discomfort may set in, especially if one isn't used to wearing a mask for prolonged periods of time. A pic showing 50%+ already wearing masks at HKG on February 1st: https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...47816b3bd0.jpg |
Originally Posted by Ari
(Post 32340010)
An N95 isn't required for that; any mask will do. The N95 protects you (in design).
|
What will happen if pax wear the masks while boarding and then after the plane takes off they remove the mask to drink and eat? Or if someone just takes it off and claims they can't breathe. What will anyone do about that?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.