Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United Continental says CEO Oscar Munoz won't become chairman as planned

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United Continental says CEO Oscar Munoz won't become chairman as planned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:09 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southern California
Programs: United MileagePlus Premier 1K, Delta SkyMiles Diamond Medallion
Posts: 1,150
United Continental says CEO Oscar Munoz won't become chairman as planned

According to CBS Marketwatch

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 21, 2017 at 3:13 pm Reason: Title updated to refect news reports
unitedbusiness is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:11 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,011
Originally Posted by unitedbusiness
According to CBS Marketwatch
Incorrect. He is still CEO; he just no longer has the contractual promotion to chairman next year as well. Definitely a result of UA3411, IMO.
PsiFighter37 is online now  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:11 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA USA
Programs: UA 1KMM, Bonvoy LTE+A, HH D, Nat'l EE, Hertz Plat, Avis PC
Posts: 3,713
That's not what the article says at all. He is no longer a shoe-in to be chairman of the board, instead leaving it up to the board's discretion. He is still very much the CEO.
DJ_Iceman is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:12 pm
  #4  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
What I find is

United Continental says CEO Oscar Munoz won't become chairman as planned

United Airlines: CEO Oscar Munoz will not take chairman position

Remains, for now as, CEO but previous advancement to Chair of the BoD is now an open issue
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:35 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
How long till Oscar retires?

Oscar hit it off with Labor and was initially a good public face for United. His MI and return had a feel good quality to it.

The last two weeks though have shown that he really has no idea of how to run a customer service business, and his public image had been really hurt.

I don't think he is "fired", I think they will keep him around for the next few years to interact with labor, but I see power moving away from him.

Kirby has really spoken up both to employees (the JFK comments) and on the 1Q call. Reading the transcript and he is clearly now able to speak up and criticize decisions that were taken by Smisik, when Oscar was on the BoB.

I think this is another shoe to drop...

p.s. the Chris Christy comments in CNN video in the second link you posted WCUA are priceless. When Chris Christy goes after you, your days are done. No more snack mix for you....
spin88 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 3:56 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, UA Gold, Marriott LTT, Avis President's Club
Posts: 1,539
There is also a WSJ article about this now (pay wall)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/united-...018-1492806979

However, an interesting note is

In a federal filing on Friday, United said its board is planning to adjust managerial incentive compensation to focus more on performance measures related to customer service.
Maybe people will be more friendly when execs up in Willis Tower see less money than they are use to!
JHake10 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:02 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by JHake10
However, an interesting note is
that's what piqued my interest.
riphamilton is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:16 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,132
A few more quotes from the WSJ article:

Originally Posted by Wall Street Journal
United said its board believes separating the roles of CEO and chairman “is the most appropriate structure at this time” and is “a means to ensure that Mr. Munoz is able to more exclusively focus on his role as CEO,” while an independent chairman can manage relations between the board and the CEO.

United also said its management and board “take recent events extremely seriously” and are in the progress of changing its compensation structure so incentives in 2017 “are directly and meaningfully tied to progress in improving the customer experience and in the necessary cultural and process changes in support of this goal.”

Mr. Munoz received $18.7 million in total compensation last year. His salary was $1.19 million. Amid the $13.8 million in stock awards he received was a restricted share award of $6.8 million related to his 2015 employment agreement, which was signed at the end of the year and thus the payment shows up in 2016 compensation.

Mr. Milton, a former CEO of Air Canada, joined United’s board just over a year ago and as a proxy-fight settlement was elevated to nonexecutive chairman for two years. Mr. Munoz initially was slated to add that post this year, and then that plan was pushed back to 2018.
Also of note, UA's AGM is scheduled for 24 May at the Willis Tower in Chicago. I imagine this meeting may have a few interesting moments.
RCyyz is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:28 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 756
Originally Posted by JHake10
There is also a WSJ article about this now (pay wall)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/united-...018-1492806979

However, an interesting note is

Maybe people will be more friendly when execs up in Willis Tower see less money than they are use to!
Definitely believe more companies should include customer satisfaction as part of the management compensation. Happy customers are huge ROI from higher brand loyalty, which means more money.
Explorer789 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:33 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: WN, AA, UA, DL
Posts: 1,313
If the news releases are true (a big "if", as always), it appears Oscar doesn't want the title.

Okay by me since I don't particularly like CEOs also being chairman.

Originally Posted by spin88
The last two weeks though have shown that he really has no idea of how to run a customer service business, and his public image had been really hurt.
Nah, you're describing the DL CEO. On the contrary, Oscar has shown that has a service mindset--maybe too much so. An isolated incident happens, and Oscar might go too far trying to make up for it. The 60 minute rule is already a negative for customers.
minnyfly is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:43 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by minnyfly
Oscar has shown that has a service mindset--maybe too much so. An isolated incident happens, and Oscar might go too far trying to make up for it. The 60 minute rule is already a negative for customers.
I think most posters would disagree with this assessment....

and I think the public also disagrees. According to a PPP poll, -In 2013 United had a +20 net favorability rating (33/13). It's dropped a net 44 points to -24 at 23/47 as of today.

- When we asked who people thought the worst airline in the country was in 2013 UA was closely bunched with American getting 10%, Delta 9%, United 8%, and Southwest 6%. Today, United 'wins' by a wide margin with 40% saying it's the worst airline to 10% for
American, 8% for Southwest, and 6% for Delta.

- Currently 35% say SWA is the best airline, 20% for Delta, 14% for American, and just 4% for United.

- Delta has seen an improvement in its image since 2013- it went from a +22
favorability at 35/13 to a +31 one at 45/14.
spin88 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 4:58 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,460
Originally Posted by spin88

- Currently 35% say SWA is the best airline, 20% for Delta, 14% for American, and just 4% for United.
WN at the top of that list pretty succinctly illustrates the difference in the metrics by which the general public rates airlines versus those frequent flyers value.
Not sure about UA right now, but I'm pretty sure AA and DL would beat WN handily around here.
rickg523 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:01 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by rickg523
WN at the top of that list pretty succinctly illustrates the difference in the metrics by which the general public rates airlines versus those frequent flyers value.
Not sure about UA right now, but I'm pretty sure AA and DL would beat WN handily around here.
Well AA/UA/DL give elites (a) ELR seating, (b) free bags, (c) a shot at an upgrade, and (d) at times special handeling.

WN gives everyone free bags, and from a customer standpoint is "friendlier." they also fly real planes into airports that AA/UA/DL only fly small RJs.

If I was flying once or twice a year, with kids and bags, WN would look a lot nicer too...
spin88 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:02 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: United Mileage Plus Premier
Posts: 782
Not really sure how this is going to help or hurt but Oscar will not be the Chairman of the Board in 2018. He will remain as CEO
https://www.aol.com/article/finance/...enge/22049963/
gene2632 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:06 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 756
Originally Posted by rickg523
WN at the top of that list pretty succinctly illustrates the difference in the metrics by which the general public rates airlines versus those frequent flyers value.
Not sure about UA right now, but I'm pretty sure AA and DL would beat WN handily around here.
Exactly what I was thinking. How many people they surveyed actually fly SW?

Like here in Chicago, I would never take a flight out of MDW, simply because it's farther from the north suburbs. From a frequent flyer perspective, their miles are worth less to me since they do not have any airline partners to redeem for international travel.
Explorer789 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.