![]() |
My guess is that the upgrade list will become an Ebay style auction with priority in order of highest to lowest bidder. Bidding ends 20 minutes prior to departure with no status required.
|
Originally Posted by andyh64000
(Post 19814985)
My guess is that the upgrade list will become an Ebay style auction with priority in order of highest to lowest bidder. Bidding ends 20 minutes prior to departure with no status required.
Very revenue driven! I like this idea. |
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 19814295)
This is not a new idea and, for instance, was done a few few years back (june 2008) by AC & Aeroplan
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/18889049-post2.html Of course, Larry is now gone, so who knows....... |
Originally Posted by andyh64000
(Post 19814985)
My guess is that the upgrade list will become an Ebay style auction with priority in order of highest to lowest bidder. Bidding ends 20 minutes prior to departure with no status required.
|
Originally Posted by RNE
(Post 19815509)
I too like this idea. In fact, I would do it as a silent auction. Every passenger can enter a maximum dollar amount he/she is willing to pay for an upgrade. Nobody knows what anyone else is bidding. The highest bidder(s) get the upgrades.
|
Originally Posted by RNE
(Post 19815509)
I too like this idea. In fact, I would do it as a silent auction. Every passenger can enter a maximum dollar amount he/she is willing to pay for an upgrade. Nobody knows what anyone else is bidding. The highest bidder(s) get the upgrades.
So, maybe someone should get the biddingforupgrade.com domain name if it is not already taken :D |
Originally Posted by RNE
(Post 19815509)
I too like this idea. In fact, I would do it as a silent auction. Every passenger can enter a maximum dollar amount he/she is willing to pay for an upgrade. Nobody knows what anyone else is bidding. The highest bidder(s) get the upgrades.
|
Originally Posted by RNE
(Post 19815509)
I too like this idea. In fact, I would do it as a silent auction. Every passenger can enter a maximum dollar amount he/she is willing to pay for an upgrade. Nobody knows what anyone else is bidding. The highest bidder(s) get the upgrades.
|
Originally Posted by TomA
(Post 19819741)
They'd lose a lot of the loyalty they have with FFs with this kind of system.
|
Does no announcements on MileagePlus program mean nothing has changed?
I thought we would have heard something by now. I'm hoping no news is good news in that all entitlements and award levels stay the same?
I was expecting something by year end. |
Originally Posted by inpd
(Post 19860929)
I thought we would have heard something by now. I'm hoping no news is good news in that all entitlements and award levels stay the same?
I was expecting something by year end. Chances are any mileage awards that go up we will get advance notice. But things like requiring us to pay fuel surcharges on tkts can come any day w little or no notice |
I would suspect that the changes & realignment in the C-suite have something to do with it. It's just speculation on my part, but I'm getting a vibe that someone woke up and figured out that a) the marketing message sucks; and b) (most) high-value flyers are profitable! Losing them to the competition is a bad thing... And I'd bet that those who were just asked to leave put a much smaller value on FF's than the numbers showed we're worth.
Granted, a small, small percentage of Elites took advantage of the AA offer and switched their flying, but I'd bet that was a disproportionate amount of margin that shifted with them. Just guesses on my part, but I think any changes we see will be designed to attract and retain - that's after all the entire point of FF programs. Probably wasn't going to be that way, but those with that sort of thinking just got walked out. Call me a glass-half-full kind of guy. ;) |
Originally Posted by dmurphynj
(Post 19861030)
I would suspect that the changes & realignment in the C-suite have something to do with it. It's just speculation on my part, but I'm getting a vibe that someone woke up and figured out that a) the marketing message sucks; and b) (most) high-value flyers are profitable! Losing them to the competition is a bad thing... And I'd bet that those who were just asked to leave put a much smaller value on FF's than the numbers showed we're worth.
Granted, a small, small percentage of Elites took advantage of the AA offer and switched their flying, but I'd bet that was a disproportionate amount of margin that shifted with them. Just guesses on my part, but I think any changes we see will be designed to attract and retain - that's after all the entire point of FF programs. Probably wasn't going to be that way, but those with that sort of thinking just got walked out. Call me a glass-half-full kind of guy. ;) |
I think United is waiting to see what AA does post-Bankruptcy. Do they merge or go it alone. I think they may institute changes to grab elites from AA if they decide to merge.
|
Originally Posted by mh3265a
(Post 19861074)
I think United is waiting to see what AA does post-Bankruptcy. Do they merge or go it alone. I think they may institute changes to grab elites from AA if they decide to merge.
This is a relief as it will keep our Appalachian Bumpkin cousin (USAir) in *A as a domestic backup for accrual and redemption. I can't tell either way if the exec shakeup is a case of "you angered our high value customers and they left" or possibly "you didn't squeeze enough revenue out of *all* our customers and keep pandering to those annoying Elite SOBs". Only time will tell....but an independent AA will at least provide an emergency escape hatch if my second thought turns out accurate. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:14 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.