Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Expert Mode" Changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 12:18 am
  #1231  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis (MSP)
Programs: AA, DL UA (.5MM)
Posts: 226
Originally Posted by NeoOfTheCRS
shannon,

Will you also remove flight arrival and departure times from united.com as they are rarely accurate and given United's operations, most customers are very confused when comparing your timetable to reality.

The enhancement could be for new flight timings could be: "Crack of dawn" "Sometime after first coffee" "Afternoon Siesta" "Dinnertime for purchase" "Pitch Black" and my favorite "Manana"
Damn fine reply for page 1 of this thread!
I seriously doubt that I'll care enough to read through the next 83 pages.

Similar to what another FT member said (on Page 2)....

Shannon, you deserve better than to have to spin corporate nonsense like this to United customers.

Unless Jeff $ and his "team" find a way to return to the real world of customer service (and damn fast), it's looking like I finally need to consider cashing out my miles and finally saying au revoir. I'm pretty sad and disappointed, because United has always earned my loyalty over many decades until this year.

Last edited by MPsince1984; Sep 13, 2012 at 12:28 am
MPsince1984 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 6:36 am
  #1232  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London, UK
Programs: A3 *G, Accor Platinum
Posts: 94
Add me to the list of lowly 2P lurkers who really value this feature at both ends of the fare scale. Mileage Plus remains the most compelling of FFPs, and Channel 9 and E+ are good features, but every move United thinks I'll like pushes me further towards being a Kayaker.
2P or not 2P is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 6:54 am
  #1233  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rock Island, IL
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), HHonors Diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 377
Originally Posted by HumbleBee
I can't see what they have to do with each other, unless you mean there will be less burden on the call centers of elites calling to process upgrades that aren't clearing properly when R>.

Even if you're right, the system collapse affected the masses, not a limited segment of their clientele. They won't reverse their decision because of us.
The system crash was due to a hardware failure - not software. The backup hardware failed too. This would not be a reason for this change.
JackieC2 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 8:54 am
  #1234  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,933
The apparent reason for removing the "EXPERT" feature is all the "EXPERTS" calling res when "R" availability pops up and a wait listed upgrade doesn't come through. Going to the same well over & over and pissing off res agents for an upgrade could just possibly be the reason the well got poisoned.

Just in case noone has quite figured it out yet (6 mo's) after the merger, the new UA doesn't care if ANYONE fly's for free in their first class section and they certainly don't care - WHO CARES!

Time to "Suck It Up" and either go along with the program or jump the fence where others have found greener pastures!

It's their way or the highway, and if you don't like it write a letter to customer service --- Let us know how that works out for you!!!
LilAbner is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 9:08 am
  #1235  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
3M
80 Nights
100 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: AVL
Programs: AA EXP, UA LT Plat, Mar LTT
Posts: 18,147
Originally Posted by LilAbner
The apparent reason for removing the "EXPERT" feature is all the "EXPERTS" calling res when "R" availability pops up and a wait listed upgrade doesn't come through. Going to the same well over & over and pissing off res agents for an upgrade could just possibly be the reason the well got poisoned.
If the system was doing the job it was supposed to, there'd be NO need to call when R>0 on a GPU/RPU. However, it doesn't do it's job, IME.
Calls to have an upgrade handled and the reservations put back into sync have just been commonplace since the takeover. Err, merger.

Dave
bseller is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 9:11 am
  #1236  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 11
WSJ Middle Seat Article Today

In today's Wall Street Journal, The Middle Seat column by Scott McCartney, describes some extraordinary customer service being doled out by Delta and Lufthansa to their most valuable frequent flyers. This is in contrast to United's treatment of FF. The article is here...
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/...aletleft_email

Numerous threads have talked about collectively taking some form of action. I chose to write Scott the email below, with the hope that he will continue to write about the treatment of FF at United. If you would like to add your voice, Scott's email is... [email protected]


Hello Scott -

Your article about Delta and Porsche today was very interesting and is in distinct contrast to how United's frequent flyers feel they are being treated. In the article you wrote, "As much as 75% of airline revenue typically comes from 25% of passengers. The top-level members of an airline frequent-flier program are the most highly coveted by a carrierand its competitors." Using Flyertalk.com as a barometer, United's frequent flyers are not feeling the love!

I want to thank you for your recent blog post reporting the outrage of United frequent flyers over the elimination of "Expert Mode", which affords the ability to see seat inventory by fare class. This is only one of the perks/benefits/tools that United has chosen to take away from their loyal road warriors since the merger with Continental. Profit maximization is a rational goal of management, still I find it amazing that United has chosen a strategy of alienating it's "most coveted" customers. Isn't it logical that there should be some form of Win / Win relationship between United and their most frequent flyers?

You are a well read and respected columnist on air travel and you are featured in the WSJ, the premier daily business publication. This may not be your thing, but I am hoping you may be an advocate for those of us suffering in the middle seat.

Regards,
Wingnut71 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 9:16 am
  #1237  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,150
Originally Posted by SFOTurtle
Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell, but there have been other instances when people spoke and UA (granted it was PMUA management and not the current CO stubborns) did make restore prior practices after trying out less customer friendly changes. Case in point, the SDC fee which was briefly $75 for 1Ps. After adopting the fee for about 6 months for all but 1Ks and GSs, UA quietly dropped it. There was considerable hostility expressed on FT when the fee was announced. Was the latter the reason why UA reinstated the prior practice? Who knows, but it sure didn't hurt.

In this case, if enough people learn about this and alter their travel behavior away from UA, even if it is only 1%, that will not go unnoticed. Everything is measured in marginal increments, and small percentages make all the difference between success and failure.
There were some protests with PMCO but in most cases it didnt do anything and PMCO stuck with whatever it was they wanted and had done.

The problem is hard as it is to believe most Companys dont see FTers as the vast majority of their customers, just probably the biggest and loudest Complainers when things go against them. Since FTers are in reality a small % of the total population why would any company simply listen to them every time they complain about something

If enough members (non FTers) join in then maybe they will rehash something. I know I would take what most people post on FT with a grain of sand, I might relook at the issue and if I still think the company will be better off $$ wise in the end , I wouldnt care what FTers or any group thought. If the $$ amount wasnt going to be significant then maybe I would revert back to what was
craz is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 9:24 am
  #1238  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,933
Originally Posted by bseller
If the system was doing the job it was supposed to, there'd be NO need to call when R>0 on a GPU/RPU. However, it doesn't do it's job, IME.
Calls to have an upgrade handled and the reservations put back into sync have just been commonplace since the takeover. Err, merger.

Dave
Hey Dave, we agree 100% on this one.

UA is screwed up, BIG TIME, and their answer to solve EVERYTHING is to hide EVERYTHING!

That'll learn them "EXPERTS" that keep calling us!!!
LilAbner is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:25 am
  #1239  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between SFO & SJC
Programs: UA 1MM (and no longer flying much)
Posts: 777
Originally Posted by NeoOfTheCRS
The enhancement could be for new flight timings could be: "Crack of dawn" "Sometime after first coffee" "Afternoon Siesta" "Dinnertime for purchase" "Pitch Black" and my favorite "Manana"
This was previously done, for different reasons, by Jet Airways back in the 1990s. Under Indian gov't regulations they could only act as an "air taxi" service and were prohibited from publishing a timetable. Their solution was to have flights labelled as "breakfast", "late breakfast", "late lunchtime", and "high tea", which people understood to mean 7am, 9:25am, 1:50pm, and 5pm departures.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...industry.india

Last edited by endrond; Sep 13, 2012 at 10:29 am Reason: clarification
endrond is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:26 am
  #1240  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: WAS (DCA preferred)
Programs: UA 1P, AA PLT
Posts: 124
The purported reasons don't stack up when it's noted that the upgrade and award availability has also been removed from ExpertFlyer, where ONLY experts would want to try and understand the fare bucket availability.
SoxIn7 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:28 am
  #1241  
Dub
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Programs: UA 1K, 2MM
Posts: 956
This change is insane. What on earth do they gain? Fewer phone calls? It was such a useful feature. Bah!
Dub is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:34 am
  #1242  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PSP
Programs: UA Lifetime Platinum with 2.5MM. Current AA EXP
Posts: 135
Seriously?

Been on vacation for the past 10 days and successfully ignored FT. When I returned yesterday I was, needless to say, surprised I couldn't see the "fare buckets" on my two reservations in "B" and "Y" to KWI and NRT over the next two months. It's rare that I book in Economy (Plus) without the ability to guarantee the GPU (assuming I haven't used them all) or mileage upgrade, but for these two reservations I was forced to.

Going forward, though, does UA seriously think 1Ks are going to have any interest in maintaining that status if the one "real" benefit (the 6 GPUs) is no longer transparent and thus generally "easy to use"? Instead of spending a few minutes (or even hours) online researching my options for ticket purchase and upgrade availability, then actually purchasing my ticket and being done with it, they really want me spending hours of their agents' time on the phone, risking that the (often uninformed) agent can't or won't help me find GPU-available flights, and then having me hang up the phone--not purchasing a ticket throughout the entire process?

Seriously? For the past 7 months I've been one of those UA die-hards that has put up with UA's pitiful integration into UAdbaCO and hoped for better things to come. I didn't status match with AA, and I've continued to fly my 1K+ miles annually and gladly use my 6 SWU/GPUs. But if I can no longer do that with some modicum of ease, forget it. As a 2MM flyer with "lifetime Platinum" (until they take it away), UA has literally taken away my sole practical reason for flying their airline 100,000+ miles per year. If this isn't changed back in fairly short order, I'll finally liquidate my 800,000 miles and take my "Y", "B" and "M" international fares to a different airline.

Did they seriously do this? Has anyone in the Willis Tower ever attended "Problem Solving 101"? Rather than fix the "R" inventory issues with IT, they just kill the functionality?
MillionMilerMan is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:42 am
  #1243  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,389
Originally Posted by JackieC2
The system crash was due to a hardware failure - not software. The backup hardware failed too. This would not be a reason for this change.
Source?
HumbleBee is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:45 am
  #1244  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Programs: UA1k; Bonvoy Titanium; Hilton Gold; IHG Gold; AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,872
Originally Posted by MillionMilerMan
It's rare that I book in Economy (Plus) without the ability to guarantee the GPU (assuming I haven't used them all) or mileage upgrade, but for these two reservations I was forced to.

Going forward, though, does UA seriously think 1Ks are going to have any interest in maintaining that status if the one "real" benefit (the 6 GPUs) is no longer transparent and thus generally "easy to use"? Instead of spending a few minutes (or even hours) online researching my options for ticket purchase and upgrade availability, then actually purchasing my ticket and being done with it, they really want me spending hours of their agents' time on the phone, risking that the (often uninformed) agent can't or won't help me find GPU-available flights, and then having me hang up the phone--not purchasing a ticket throughout the entire process?

Seriously? For the past 7 months I've been one of those UA die-hards that has put up with UA's pitiful integration into UAdbaCO and hoped for better things to come. I didn't status match with AA, and I've continued to fly my 1K+ miles annually and gladly use my 6 SWU/GPUs. But if I can no longer do that with some modicum of ease, forget it. As a 2MM flyer with "lifetime Platinum" (until they take it away), UA has literally taken away my sole practical reason for flying their airline 100,000+ miles per year. If this isn't changed back in fairly short order, I'll finally liquidate my 800,000 miles and take my "Y", "B" and "M" international fares to a different airline.

Did they seriously do this? Has anyone in the Willis Tower ever attended "Problem Solving 101"? Rather than fix the "R" inventory issues with IT, they just kill the functionality?
Well said +1
1k650 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 10:51 am
  #1245  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,137
Originally Posted by HumbleBee
Originally Posted by JackieC2
The system crash was due to a hardware failure - not software. The backup hardware failed too. This would not be a reason for this change.
Source?
United says hardware issue caused outage
Other references toward the end of http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ssion-etc.html.

Originally Posted by LilAbner
The apparent reason for removing the "EXPERT" feature is all the "EXPERTS" calling res when "R" availability pops up and a wait listed upgrade doesn't come through. Going to the same well over & over and pissing off res agents for an upgrade could just possibly be the reason the well got poisoned....
don't beleive UA has been that specific about the issue but seem speculative discussion in http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...omplaints.html
WineCountryUA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.