![]() |
Originally Posted by cbchicago
(Post 19302801)
Add me to the list of people who do not like this change. It kinda hard to find flight to use my 10 RPUs on if I can't see what flights have R seats. I will call the Ik desk and take up the agents time (Hours if I have to) to find the right flights. ...
|
Originally Posted by Bonehead
(Post 19303023)
Versus $15 for a two-month KVS subscription that would allow you to find "R" inventory? Good heavens, man.
|
Have made two multi-segment trips to LHR from OGG in the past 6 weeks (including the Olympic time frame) using GPU's and spent less than one hour in putting each of the trips together. I have invested more than 6 hours working on the identical trip with some flexibility in my travel dates through the remainder of the year without success. What a time waster. Maybe I should call in and have an agent join me in the misery. I suspect that with the tools that they have at their disposal, they would be able to come up with available dates or be able to confirm non availability in less than one hour. Oh wait....these were the same tools we used to have. It is amazing how many web pages that I need to constantly refer back and forth to get the same info I had before. If you don't believe me, try putting together a multi-segment itinerary using GPU's.
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 19303077)
Or, you know, just using the website.
|
Originally Posted by LAXOGG
(Post 19303110)
What a time waster. Maybe I should call in and have an agent join me in the misery. I suspect that with the tools that they have at their disposal, they would be able to come up with available dates or be able to confirm non availability in less than one hour. .
|
While I don't like the change..
I find the FT community on this thread less than professional. Like it or not UA is a business, suck it up or move on, if you are here to whinge and complain, it's not going make UA change their stance on the issue. Just get over it and move on, personally I'm sick of reading all the nonsense crap from posters on this issue. Get over it, it's here, has happened, deal with it, rather than act like a bunch of cry babies. |
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303402)
While I don't like the change..
I find the FT community on this thread less than professional. Like it or not UA is a business, suck it up or move on, if you are here to whinge and complain, it's not going make UA change their stance on the issue. Just get over it and move on, personally I'm sick of reading all the nonsense crap from posters on this issue. Get over it, it's here, has happened, deal with it, rather than act like a bunch of cry babies. :confused: Have you skipped out on reading anything on FT over the past decade or so? |
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303402)
While I don't like the change..
I find the FT community on this thread less than professional. Like it or not UA is a business, suck it up or move on, if you are here to whinge and complain, it's not going make UA change their stance on the issue. Just get over it and move on, personally I'm sick of reading all the nonsense crap from posters on this issue. Get over it, it's here, has happened, deal with it, rather than act like a bunch of cry babies. This is beyond ridiculous. |
Oh please.
|
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303482)
What makes you think that FT has any importance to UA running a business?
|
UAInsider posted the change, not because we are important, but as a matter of this weird thing called Social Media.
|
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303402)
While I don't like the change..
I find the FT community on this thread less than professional. Like it or not UA is a business, suck it up or move on, if you are here to whinge and complain, it's not going make UA change their stance on the issue. Just get over it and move on, personally I'm sick of reading all the nonsense crap from posters on this issue. Get over it, it's here, has happened, deal with it, rather than act like a bunch of cry babies. Shrinking Globe Elite Qualification based upon dollar spend Boarding process Elimination of E+ |
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303402)
While I don't like the change..
I find the FT community on this thread less than professional. Like it or not UA is a business, suck it up or move on, if you are here to whinge and complain, it's not going make UA change their stance on the issue. Just get over it and move on, personally I'm sick of reading all the nonsense crap from posters on this issue. Get over it, it's here, has happened, deal with it, rather than act like a bunch of cry babies. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Asuka
(Post 19303531)
Want to back that up with a Quote from UA? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by ciaobel
(Post 19302362)
This is a great idea - anything we can do to reverse this decision?
Many starting points: 1. Media: WSJ, travel blogs 2. Investor Relations 3. Sr. Management, Board Members 4. Shareholders - especially JPM and mutual funds 5. Social: online petition, viral message We are a small group, but collectively, if we stop flying UA, all of us (I have completely), it will hurt the bottom line. THEN they will listen. There's no other way around it. Stop flying United and the board will have to get rid of Smisek. Did anyone see this Reuters article in the Chicago Tribune? The business travelers - the over-entitled ones - are going elsewhere. As stated in article: United said last week its share of lucrative corporate fliers has been less than it expected because of problems resulting from the blending of operational systems from United and Continental following their merger. More like problems resulting from how they are treating their best passengers. Don't be fooled for one minute, Smisek is looking out only for himself. He does not care about anyone else. It's all about him and his bonus. The mentality starts at the top and trickles down to everyone. I will bet they joke about us during their meetings and dinners - I can see it now. To them, we are all over-entitled. The CFO blurted out EXACTLY what the management thinks, it wasn't a mistake. If this continues, I can't imagine why any premium passenger would stick around. Someone made a comment about being at the gate, on a couple of flights, when they called GS and 1K for boarding, he noticed there were none....anyone notice the same thing? Just curious if they are going elsewhere. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:35 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.