FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   "Expert Mode" Changes (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1385358-expert-mode-changes.html)

burlax Sep 8, 2012 12:43 pm


Originally Posted by bob_the_d (Post 19277235)
I think we should give it some time before jumping to conclusions. As an IT person I'm also aware of how straining constant scrapes are, even to enterprise grade systems. IMHO this might be a simple case of good intentions, but bad execution and they just don't have a working solution to it. It very well might be that they'll find an alternate way of showing it to us but they just don't have it yet. Bad IT execution, yes, but I'm not pulling out my tin hat anti-consumer pitchfork quite yet.

I do agree it's a damned inconvenience though, no arguing that one.

Total BS. Had screen scraping been the problem, it could have been easily solved by captchas, limiting access to that data to accounts at premier level, and closure of the accounts from which scraping occurs.

However, the more logical explanation is that people whose upgrades were not clearing were making angry calls after seeing open inventory. You can't solve this problem with captchas, but you can solve it with denying access to information - if people don't know they are being duped, they won't get upset. Right?

FlyWorld Sep 8, 2012 12:44 pm


Originally Posted by ual744777sta (Post 19277558)
Looks like KVS came up with a fix.

For what? R Space?

exerda Sep 8, 2012 12:52 pm


Originally Posted by burlax (Post 19277888)
However, the more logical explanation is that people whose upgrades were not clearing were making angry calls after seeing open inventory. You can't solve this problem with captchas, but you can solve it with denying access to information - if people don't know they are being duped, they won't get upset. Right?

+1

This is the only "confusion" explanation I find remotely accurate.

RichardInSF Sep 8, 2012 12:54 pm

And expertflyer just emailed me to use the United "check for upgrade" method. I hope they relent and make the same sort of change KVS did because otherwise they are telling me to switch tools.

Antipode Sep 8, 2012 1:00 pm

However shady the reason might be, I can see how United may want to remove upgrade/award inventory from the fare class listing. I still don't see any good reason why the revenue fare classes have to be removed. Screen scraping? Not a real issue since those are being accessed through GDS by KVS, EF, Flightstats, and the like. Confusion? Only by a small few who don't really understand that valid fares are necessary in addition to fare class availability to book a certain fare, but I can't imagine many of those go as far as calling UA and bothering agents about it -- and at any rate after they have it explained once to them would never need to call again.

At the same time, it takes away the ability for customers to look for and book valid ticket, particularly complicated ones where one would want to look for availability segment by segment; and it also takes away the ability to look for additional SDC options or decide in advance if it's a likely possibility or not (same thing with standby). You would think UA would like the customer to have access to information for both of those as they want people to book tickets, and SDC/standby brings in additional revenue (with the exception of the elites who have the fee waiver).

ExCrew Sep 8, 2012 1:02 pm

Not to pile on, but I left in March of this year after 7 years as a 1K. I could see this "death by 1,000 cuts" crap coming a mile away and decided to reward another carrier with my bizniz instead (WN is the dominant carrier out of SMF). About 4 months later, I qualified for A-list, then A-list + and now Companion Pass on Southwest.
It's amazing to think that roughly a year and a half ago that I would have never even thought of being a top tier flier on WN...but here I am. As we speak, I'm posting this from a WN flight that my partner and I took, last minute, to have a night out and spend time with friends down in Santa Ana. Round trip, it cost us only 16,200 points...not each, but for the two of us (!), to make this trip, plus $10 in total 9/11 fees for the both of us. No hassles, no drama...just get on the plane, get where we're going, and done. None of what I just mentioned would be possible on UA.
After 8 years of flying, the rapidly dwindling "perks" at COdbaUA made flying a pain in the azz. At this point, they could give the store away, and I wouldn't come back.
No doubt, there are MANY more just like me...and those ranks are rapdily growing.

B787938 Sep 8, 2012 1:05 pm

What a customer unfriendly move. I use the fare buckets to see what flights I can do a SDC on as well as which ones are more friendly to upgrades.

I don't know about y'all, but I am starting to think Jeffy doesn't really mean what he says about transparency, respect, and all that other stuff he goes on about. :cool:

FlyWorld Sep 8, 2012 1:06 pm

Seems another change rolled out on Friday night ... now I get this when I try to search for award availability:

"! We’re sorry, but united.com was unable to complete your request. Please try later or contact united.com Support in the U.S. and Canada at 1-800-396-1751; the U.K., phone 0800 028 5003; elsewhere use the local phone number."

It seems that everything they do is forcing us to spend ever-increasing hours on the phone.

Why?

exerda Sep 8, 2012 1:07 pm


Originally Posted by mitchmu (Post 19277973)
It seems that everything they do is forcing us to spend ever-increasing hours on the phone.

Why?

(tongue-in-cheek, somewhat): They're going to blame the "over-entitled elites" for delays and increasing costs w/r/t the call centers.

dulcamara Sep 8, 2012 1:08 pm

Pure crap. This "misinterpreted" excuse is as lame as any I've heard from CodbaUA yet. Why do you care if independent sites "scrape" your data and help your customers? Oh wait, you seem to hate your customers.

This is the worst of the changes and may render my GPUs useless next year.

kyte Sep 8, 2012 1:10 pm


Originally Posted by mitchmu (Post 19277973)
Seems another change rolled out on Friday night ... now I get this when I try to search for award availability:

"! We’re sorry, but united.com was unable to complete your request. Please try later or contact united.com Support in the U.S. and Canada at 1-800-396-1751; the U.K., phone 0800 028 5003; elsewhere use the local phone number."

It seems that everything they do is forcing us to spend ever-increasing hours on the phone.

Why?

Probably in hopes that people just give up and play the W lottery. Wouldn't put it past them.

ual744777sta Sep 8, 2012 1:15 pm


Originally Posted by mitchmu (Post 19277894)
For what? R Space?

It looks like KVS developed a fix for R space:

[KVS Availability Tool 7.0.5/Diamond - ITA: Upgrades/UA]
Code:

LAX  Los Angeles Intl CA US [KLAX]
DEN  Denver Intl CO US [KDEN]
FRI  21 Sep 2012 | 1 Seat

Carrier    Flight  From  Depart    To    Arrive    A/C  St  Availability
---------  ------  ----  --------  ----  --------  ---  --  ------------
UA        1554    LAX  12:33    DEN  15:57    738      CU+
UA        1520    LAX  17:24    DEN  20:45    739      CU+
UA        737    LAX  18:51    DEN  22:06    320      CU+
UA        245    LAX  06:02    DEN  09:19    763      CU+
UA        716    LAX  08:05    DEN  11:30    752      CU+
UA        662    LAX  11:45    DEN  15:02    320      CU-
UA        443    LAX  15:17    DEN  18:29    752      CU+
UA/OO      6472    LAX  07:35    ABQ  10:30    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/XE  5961    ABQ  11:50    DEN  13:08    EM4      CU/
UA/OO      6216    LAX  12:41    ABQ  15:36    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/S5  3459    ABQ  19:26    DEN  20:45    E70      CU+
UA/OO      6216    LAX  12:41    ABQ  15:36    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/XE  5992    ABQ  16:50    DEN  18:06    EM4      CU/
UA/OO      6492    LAX  12:42    ASE  15:45    CR7      CU+
 -> UA/OO  5623    ASE  16:18    DEN  17:04    CR7      CU-
UA/OO      6345    LAX  13:34    COS  16:52    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/XE  6004    COS  19:30    DEN  20:11    EM4      CU/
UA/OO      6229    LAX  06:56    COS  10:14    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  5487    COS  10:47    DEN  11:28    CR7      CU+
UA/OO      6440    LAX  10:43    COS  14:01    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/YX  4873    COS  15:20    DEN  16:03    DH4      CU/
UA/OO      6229    LAX  06:56    COS  10:14    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/XE  5987    COS  11:55    DEN  12:38    EM4      CU/
UA/OO      6440    LAX  10:43    COS  14:01    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  6337    COS  16:03    DEN  16:43    CR7      CU+
UA/OO      6319    LAX  08:25    LAS  09:39    CR2      CU/
 -> UA    1626    LAS  10:45    DEN  13:43    738      CU-
UA/OO      6503    LAX  15:04    LAS  16:16    CR2      CU/
 -> UA    1518    LAS  17:52    DEN  20:45    739      CU-
UA/OO      6235    LAX  11:44    PDX  14:10    CR2      CU/
 -> UA    422    PDX  15:21    DEN  18:47    320      CU+
UA/OO      6211    LAX  07:44    PDX  10:10    CR2      CU/
 -> UA    1247    PDX  11:08    DEN  14:38    738      CU+
UA/OO      6522    LAX  12:36    PHX  14:04    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/XE  5973    PHX  17:11    DEN  19:56    EM4      CU/
UA/OO      6522    LAX  12:36    PHX  14:04    CR2      CU/
 -> UA    1418    PHX  16:03    DEN  18:53    738      CU+
UA/OO      6526    LAX  08:02    PHX  09:25    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  6516    PHX  12:28    DEN  15:08    CR7      CU+
UA/OO      6526    LAX  08:02    PHX  09:25    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/US  3055    PHX  12:20    DEN  15:08    321      CU-
UA/US      3110    LAX  12:45    PHX  14:06    321      CU-
 -> UA/XE  5973    PHX  17:11    DEN  19:56    EM4      CU/
UA/US      3110    LAX  12:45    PHX  14:06    321      CU-
 -> UA    1418    PHX  16:03    DEN  18:53    738      CU+
UA/US      2776    LAX  07:40    PHX  09:16    319      CU-
 -> UA/OO  6516    PHX  12:28    DEN  15:08    CR7      CU+
UA/US      2856    LAX  10:10    PHX  11:28    321      CU-
 -> UA/OO  6516    PHX  12:28    DEN  15:08    CR7      CU+
UA/OO      6322    LAX  08:25    SAN  09:21    EM2      CU/
 -> UA    676    SAN  11:28    DEN  14:45    752      CU+
UA/OO      6335    LAX  15:02    SAN  15:57    EM2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  6501    SAN  17:13    DEN  20:24    CR7      CU+
UA/OO      6327    LAX  12:06    SAN  12:58    EM2      CU/
 -> UA    1712    SAN  15:21    DEN  18:40    739      CU+
UA/OO      6333    LAX  13:27    SAN  14:20    EM2      CU/
 -> UA    1712    SAN  15:21    DEN  18:40    739      CU+
UA/OO      6431    LAX  08:20    SAT  13:09    CR7      CU-
 -> UA/S5  3445    SAT  14:30    DEN  15:48    E70      CU+
UA/OO      5377    LAX  08:14    SBA  09:03    EM2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  5571    SBA  09:58    DEN  13:24    CR2      CU/
UA/OO      5341    LAX  06:50    SBA  07:39    EM2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  5571    SBA  09:58    DEN  13:24    CR2      CU/
UA/OO      5362    LAX  12:51    SBA  13:37    EM2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  6192    SBA  14:37    DEN  18:05    CR2      CU/
UA/OO      5538    LAX  07:12    SEA  09:48    CR7      CU+
 -> UA    793    SEA  11:05    DEN  14:43    752      CU+
UA        1704    LAX  06:03    SFO  07:22    739      CU+
 -> UA    263    SFO  08:02    DEN  11:30    752      CU+
UA        1595    LAX  06:32    SFO  08:04    738      CU+
 -> UA    672    SFO  10:38    DEN  14:09    320      CU-
UA        1249    LAX  10:59    SFO  12:30    753      CU+
 -> UA    719    SFO  13:02    DEN  16:41    763      CU+
UA        1161    LAX  08:25    SFO  10:01    753      CU+
 -> UA    672    SFO  10:38    DEN  14:09    320      CU-
UA        477    LAX  10:10    SFO  11:40    319      CU-
 -> UA    719    SFO  13:02    DEN  16:41    763      CU+
UA        1161    LAX  08:25    SFO  10:01    753      CU+
 -> UA    243    SFO  11:48    DEN  15:20    320      CU-
UA        1489    LAX  12:46    SFO  14:11    738      CU+
 -> UA    256    SFO  16:00    DEN  19:25    752      CU+
UA        1249    LAX  10:59    SFO  12:30    753      CU+
 -> UA    301    SFO  14:25    DEN  17:50    763      CU+
UA        1673    LAX  16:02    SFO  17:32    738      CU+
 -> UA    482    SFO  18:29    DEN  21:49    320      CU-
UA        1494    LAX  15:05    SFO  16:28    739      CU+
 -> UA    482    SFO  18:29    DEN  21:49    320      CU-
UA/OO      6499    LAX  07:50    SJC  09:08    CR2      CU/
 -> UA/OO  5578    SJC  11:17    DEN  14:45    CR7      CU-
UA/OO      5612    LAX  07:37    SLC  10:32    CR7      CU+
 -> UA/OO  6411    SLC  13:25    DEN  14:51    CR2      CU/
UA/OO      5635    LAX  07:50    SMF  09:14    CR7      CU+
 -> UA/OO  5526    SMF  10:00    DEN  13:26    CR2      CU/


LASUA1K Sep 8, 2012 1:15 pm


Originally Posted by ExCrew (Post 19277960)
Not to pile on, but I left in March of this year after 7 years as a 1K. I could see this "death by 1,000 cuts" crap coming a mile away and decided to reward another carrier with my bizniz instead (WN is the dominant carrier out of SMF). About 4 months later, I qualified for A-list, then A-list + and now Companion Pass on Southwest.
It's amazing to think that roughly a year and a half ago that I would have never even thought of being a top tier flier on WN...but here I am. As we speak, I'm posting this from a WN flight that my partner and I took, last minute, to have a night out and spend time with friends down in Santa Ana. Round trip, it cost us only 16,200 points...not each, but for the two of us (!), to make this trip, plus $10 in total 9/11 fees for the both of us. No hassles, no drama...just get on the plane, get where we're going, and done. None of what I just mentioned would be possible on UA.
After 8 years of flying, the rapidly dwindling "perks" at COdbaUA made flying a pain in the azz. At this point, they could give the store away, and I wouldn't come back.
No doubt, there are MANY more just like me...and those ranks are rapdily growing.

You sound like me! UA was great then it went downhill. WN 737's go everywhere I need to go domestic. UA's barbie jets or WN? WN wins all the time. Free internet is great and more airplanes are being fit with it.

njcommodore Sep 8, 2012 1:15 pm


Originally Posted by dulcamara (Post 19277982)
and my render my GPUs useless next year.

how so?

exerda Sep 8, 2012 1:17 pm


Originally Posted by njcommodore (Post 19278013)
how so?

Useless, no.

Lessened in value, yes.

The devaluation occurs in two ways: first, it will be harder to judge which flights are better chances to clear (when waitlisting); second, it will be significantly harder to determine when your waitlisted GPU hasn't cleared but should have (and this does happen fairly frequently).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:45 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.