![]() |
Originally Posted by cyclogenesis
(Post 19277254)
Again as stated before a simple "enter code" system would eliminate this problem.
I don't know whats going on behind the scene, maybe they've been in an escalated battle with screen scrapes and did this as a last resort to get it 'solved' by end of week? Adding a randomness that is required to actually stop screen scrapes is more than just adding a captcha or re-c, not to mention those are proven to be very annoying and customers don't get them right and think it is their fault, sometimes they are just unreadable gibberish! It really isn't the long term answer, as it can be defeated with the simple types, very easily the best system is a multi faceted approach that requires multiple small steps that aren't easily duplicated. They could also make a custom image verification system using their own library of images, logos and logic. |
Originally Posted by UA Insider
(Post 19275211)
Hi Everyone,
Getting this information back into the hands of the “right” users is our next step. As many of you have suggested, the solution lies somewhere between adding this information as an option in a profile setting to providing even more detail in much smarter ways. I would never couch this as a “change we expect anyone to like”. I can appreciate that it’s seen as a take away. We are committed to making this information more robust and useful though – especially for our expert travelers. I know it can't happen quickly enough. Shannon |
Originally Posted by camachinist
(Post 19277029)
Has anyone who is/with a corporate/full-service travel agency with native GDS/CRS access confirmed that availability is extent/gone from that source as well? My recollection (prior to booking awards on the internet) is that a travel agent could make award bookings so they'd have to be able to see information and book into available inventory. Mine did this a number of times back in the 90's. Corrections/clarifications are appreciated.
I mention this because of the discussion in this thread and the travel tools forum about EF scraping UA data versus having CRS/GDS access. |
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 19277197)
So are you defending this new policy? I'm sure some are.
Originally Posted by Ari
(Post 19277291)
So the new UA doesn't even give this information to their best consolidators.
|
If you just want award inventory the united site shows it just fine; not sure why you'd go through milewise or anyone else just for that unless they are showing it in a different way than what UA shows directly.
For the other inventory buckets, I highly doubt they are published into any of the GDS resources out there. Most airlines make a point of not actively publishing award inventory to the public. |
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 19277185)
1) You don't have to book "blindly" for an instrument upgrade. AFAIK the "request upgrade" check box is still there and it will show you if a flight is available for confirmed upgrade or not. Instead of being shown the # of seats, you'll get a "yes" or "no" answer.
3) Yes, this somewhat closes the loophole/bug for when a wait list doesn't clear despite there being "R" inventory. That's probably a good thing - at least it's a fair thing. But you can still check for availability per #1 above, and you can still call in. So it's not completely closed. 2) As has been stated many times before here, anyone who books a ticket or calls to inquire will jump the queue while the 1K is sitting on the waitlist that never clears.
Originally Posted by MrChu
(Post 19277250)
:td::td::td:
Why don't you take away the ability to book online too?! so we don't see the cheapest fares! This is a horrible change... |
A friend's colleague is planning a winter vacation and wants to use GPUs and also wants a W fare, can't find that on 1 website and he doesn't want to sit there and use EF to find each flight w/ W and then search UA for R, so he's planning on a 3 to 4 hour call where he looks at every single routing IAD/EWR to each European city for W+R space over a 3 week period. I'm sure he could do that award search but they are unsure if it will be 2 or 4 going and he doesn't want to search both, so he's pissed and that's what he's doing to respond to this.
|
Originally Posted by ffI
(Post 19274571)
CO OnePass was not called NonePass for nothing
I think CO pioneered what was adopted by DL and others by gutting the FF program. I still have Seth's addon in my chrome that still seems to work for now. F still shows inventory It is not clear if EF will be affected as it pays UA for the access and not screen scraper. So I wonder if KVS will be affected. EF is not showing United at all as an option for awards or upgrades. |
Originally Posted by mitchmu
(Post 19277321)
1) I'm on UA.COM now and I cannot find any way to search for flights that have R space available. Now, the only option I've got is to choose a flight blindly, even if the flight leaving a few hours later has R space, I can't see it.
Originally Posted by mitchmu
(Post 19277321)
2) As has been stated many times before here, anyone who books a ticket or calls to inquire will jump the queue while the 1K is sitting on the waitlist that never clears.
|
"Expert Mode" Changes
My favorite posts in this thread (and I've read them all) are the ones from people who are going to call the "premier" line daily to check for inventory. In my recent experience, the premier line routes to the ICC 9/10 times anyway.
Do you really think that UA would be bothered by hiring a few more ICC reps at what I am sure are minimal wages compared to those in the USA, and Who on earth has the sort of time to waste on the phone, talking to clueless agents daily, to see if upgrade space is available? Just do the smart thing and move your business to an airline where things work like they are supposed to, and they don't play any of these ridiculous games! |
Next year my wife and I both 1k will cash out our 1.3 million miles on award travel and then switch to American.
|
Originally Posted by Pat89339
(Post 19276590)
Probably because they have discovered a way to provide this information to us for a fee! It's all about the ancillary fees. After all, if EF and KVS can make money off of it. Why can't they?
What I can't stand is the lack of integrity United repeatedly shows in lying about why they do things. It started when they tried to chisel down the distances flown between city pairs and has continued since. At some point, you spend money (or not) on a company's product because you admire (or not) that company. Little to find that is admirable about UA these days. |
Originally Posted by makhdoom
(Post 19277244)
Will the execs not be back on Monday ?
|
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 19277147)
AC and LX are definitely part of the ATI. I'm not sure about SN...
TK and US are non-ATI members - that's for sure. http://atwonline.com/airline-finance...plus-plus-1117 |
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 19277185)
Ok, I've read most of the reactions except the last few pages. I do think people are over-reacting.
2) Revenue bucket info is still available on KVS and ExpertFlyer. If you're really using this info ever day, $100/yr is worth it. Plus you get inventory and seat alerts. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:53 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.