FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   Specific GPU and RPU usage questions thread (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1371697-specific-gpu-rpu-usage-questions-thread.html)

limey1K Mar 19, 2014 8:28 pm

I should porbably know this...
 
I applied an RPU weeks ago to a trip this Friday: BOS-IAD-DEN

BOS-IAD cleared right away but the 8 F seats that were un-booked at the time of ticketing are now showing F1. I'm riding on a Q fare but I don't believe that I'll clear the RPU for IAD-DEN. Will this eat my RPU or will I get it back? If its burned, I'm going to be really disappointed because I'm batting less than 30% on CPUs and now RPUs aren't clearing with more than 50% of the F cabin available weeks ahead of time.

alex_b Mar 19, 2014 8:31 pm


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 22555087)
I applied an RPU weeks ago to a trip this Friday: BOS-IAD-DEN

BOS-IAD cleared right away but the 8 F seats that were un-booked at the time of ticketing are now showing F1. I'm riding on a Q fare but I don't believe that I'll clear the RPU for IAD-DEN. Will this eat my RPU or will I get it back? If its burned, I'm going to be really disappointed because I'm batting less than 30% on CPUs and now RPUs aren't clearing with more than 50% of the F cabin available weeks ahead of time.

Knowing that R space often opens up around T-24 I sometime checkin and see where I am on the upgrade list before calling in to apply the RPU. I've done that a couple of times LGA-DEN on a Friday night for a weekend's skiing.

WineCountryUA Mar 19, 2014 8:31 pm


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 22555087)
....
BOS-IAD cleared right away but the 8 F seats that were un-booked at the time of ticketing are now showing F1. I'm riding on a Q fare but I don't believe that I'll clear the RPU for IAD-DEN. Will this eat my RPU .....

yeap --- a segment is enough to consume the RPU.

Your choice is to downgrade yourself if the needed conditions can be met or continue to hope on clearing IAD-DEN -- you will be ahead of all non-GS CPU.

Kacee Mar 19, 2014 8:38 pm


Originally Posted by limey1K (Post 22555087)
I'm riding on a Q fare but I don't believe that I'll clear the RPU for IAD-DEN.

Probably right, unfortunately, since you're behind the gov't Y and B fares for the upgrade.


Originally Posted by alex_b (Post 22555107)
Knowing that R space often opens up around T-24 I sometime checkin and see where I am on the upgrade list before calling in to apply the RPU. I've done that a couple of times LGA-DEN on a Friday night for a weekend's skiing.

+1
This is your best hope, that R opens at T-24 and no one sweeps in.

craz Mar 19, 2014 8:44 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 22555110)
yeap --- a segment is enough to consume the RPU.

Your choice is to downgrade yourself if the needed conditions can be met or continue to hope on clearing IAD-DEN -- you will be ahead of all non-GS CPU.

This is why if I have both a long haul and short haul flight I dont apply my RPU to the short haul segment until my long haul 1st clears. Worse comes to worse I ride in Y on the short haul = no real damage. If the LH doesnt clear then I blew the RPU for a short haul

Once the LH clears I call up and have them apply that same RPU to the short haul as well, if it doesnt clear the SH no big deal

donjo Mar 22, 2014 12:03 pm

RPU Question:
I seldom use an RPU (mostly give them to companion travelers), but I wanted to ensure, as much as possible, an upgrade tomorrow on 1064 (EWR-BOS). I am 1K, on a G fare. Equipment is a 737-800 which I purchased in December, and applied the RPU about a month ago. I am number two on the upgrade list. Seems unusual. Thoughts?

United FirstŪ Upgrade Standby List:
United FirstŪ: 16 | Booked: Full | Checked In: 4
Customers Upgraded to United FirstŪ: United FirstŪ Upgrade Standby List *

NAME SEAT
JAC, N. 2F
JAC, T. 2E
LAW, C. 1F
MCK, M. 1A
MCK, W. 1B

NAME
1. KAU, P.
2. DON, J.
3. LHU, L.
4. GOI, N.
5. BHI, F.
6. YID, P.
7. GOI, H.
8. BRU, E.
9. BRI, A.
10. MCA, J.
11. HIN, M.

United FirstŪ Upgrade Standby List FAQ * This list only includes upgrade-eligible customers that have checked in for this flight.

WineCountryUA Mar 22, 2014 12:21 pm


Originally Posted by donjo (Post 22569152)
... I am 1K, on a G fare. Equipment is a 737-800 which I purchased in December, and applied the RPU about a month ago. I am number two on the upgrade list. Seems unusual. Thoughts?
....

why unusual?

As a 1K I occasionally have RPU fail, especially on elite heavy routes at peak travel times.

All GSs are above you plus any 1K on a higher fare on using GPU/RPU/miles is ahead of you. The 1K could be connect from an international flight in EWR and used a GPU.

Given it is a very short flight, not sure I would care much.

Kacee Mar 22, 2014 2:58 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 22569218)
why unusual?

As a 1K I occasionally have RPU fail, especially on elite heavy routes at peak travel times.

All GSs are above you plus any 1K on a higher fare on using GPU/RPU/miles is ahead of you. The 1K could be connect from an international flight in EWR and used a GPU.

Given it is a very short flight, not sure I would care much.

Elite Y/B/M's are also ahead of you. Still, I would also have expected the upgrade to clear. Blessing if it doesn't. EWR-BOS is a waste of an RPU.

Bonehead Mar 25, 2014 1:19 pm

Possible to "cancel" RPU request one one leg if the other cleared?
 
Family of three traveling together on a two-segment itinerary. Husband & wife got M-ups on leg 2 and used RPU to upgrade the 15-year-old also. Leg 1 is F0; the kid is of course waitlisted but they don't want him to clear, as it is highly unlikely that three seats will open up and they want to sit together.

Can the RPU on leg 1 be neutralized while keeping the RPU on leg 2?

alex_b Mar 25, 2014 1:25 pm


Originally Posted by Bonehead (Post 22586180)
Family of three traveling together on a two-segment itinerary. Husband & wife got M-ups on leg 2 and used RPU to upgrade the 15-year-old also. Leg 1 is F0; the kid is of course waitlisted but they don't want him to clear, as it is highly unlikely that three seats will open up and they want to sit together.

Can the RPU on leg 1 be neutralized while keeping the RPU on leg 2?

Easiest way to deal with this is if leg 1 clears offer the kid's F seat to the person sat next to the parents in coach. That said if the parents are on M ups they'll clear before the kid anyway.

WineCountryUA Mar 25, 2014 1:27 pm


Originally Posted by Bonehead (Post 22586180)
... Can the RPU on leg 1 be neutralized while keeping the RPU on leg 2?

Simple, if it has not cleared, just call and ask for it to be removed from the Leg 1.

Bonehead Mar 25, 2014 3:47 pm


Originally Posted by alex_b (Post 22586228)
Easiest way to deal with this is if leg 1 clears offer the kid's F seat to the person sat next to the parents in coach. That said if the parents are on M ups they'll clear before the kid anyway.

M-ups may not be automatic (they weren't on leg 2...had to be done proactively). That said, offering the upgrade to some unsuspecting single traveler is a good fallback strategy.


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 22586235)
Simple, if it has not cleared, just call and ask for it to be removed from the Leg 1.

I wonder if anyone has experience doing this. I certainly think that's the right answer in theory, but the fear of course is that the system can't handle that and would boot the kid to Y on leg 2.

WineCountryUA Mar 25, 2014 3:51 pm


Originally Posted by Bonehead (Post 22587078)
I wonder if anyone has experience doing this. ....

I regularly apply RPUs to the longer legs only and then later add shorter legs or not. There is no issue with applying RPUs to just 1 segment when there could be multiple segments -- this is not a theoretical suggestion, many of do this regularly.

Originally Posted by Bonehead (Post 22587078)
.... That said, offering the upgrade to some unsuspecting single traveler is a good fallback strategy. ....

unless that person is resistant to changing -- rare I suspect but I have seen this.

Bonehead Mar 25, 2014 5:01 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 22587112)
I regularly apply RPUs to the longer legs only and then later add shorter legs or not. There is no issue with applying RPUs to just 1 segment when there could be multiple segments -- this is not a theoretical suggestion, many of do this regularly....

But have you ever retracted a waitlisted RPU after the other leg has cleared? I'm worried that the system isn't set up to do that, despite what a well-meaning agent might say (or try :eek:).

WineCountryUA Mar 25, 2014 5:19 pm


Originally Posted by Bonehead (Post 22587465)
But have you ever retracted a waitlisted RPU after the other leg has cleared? I'm worried that the system isn't set up to do that, despite what a well-meaning agent might say (or try :eek:).

Specially no but I have pulled waitlisted RPU on 1 segment that originally was on two segments - no issues. While I understand caution, I personally would have no concerns doing what you describe.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.