Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UAs Official Response to HKG Ticketing/IT Error: Redeem @ Correct Amount or Redeposit

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UAs Official Response to HKG Ticketing/IT Error: Redeem @ Correct Amount or Redeposit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:42 am
  #946  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,205
Originally Posted by Happy
Yes, it is already addressed in the UA Insider's post - that customers who booked the tickets have 2 options -

1) fly the award with the correct miles paid.
2) cancel the award with fee waived. (though so far it seems you could not get fee waived cancellation doing it online, but given the directives so far, the phone agent should be able to waive $150 fee manually if you call in to cancel.)
But we know that's not going to happen - DOT is looking into this as expected, so there is going to be a different outcome.

My question is what outcome is going to placate the torch and pitchfork crowd - getting a refund of the miles after the trip (while taking the risk this might not happen) or a ETC voucher for some unknown amount valid on future travel?
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:43 am
  #947  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by N1120A
UA went Ch. 11 once, and it had nothing to do with their high breakage compensation regime.



Fees and costs are different things. UA would have to have a specific statutory basis to get fees.



That would get them in even more trouble. If the airline cancels, they have an obligation to still provide transport.



CO even had a problem with incorrectly attempting to apply a $150 redeposit in situations where a 1K booked someone else on their miles. You had to call.



1) You presume the deal was only around 3 hours. The indications are that this was around at least from Saturday.

2) While I could see reasons for someone to visit HKG 75 times in 11 months - especially as a small business owner who self-funds all travel - I agree that such a person would likely be acting without any justification at all. Also, remember that this worked for beyond flights.
Even a self employed business owner would have no reason for 75 round trips for himself in a year. Before I moved my offices to Dubai, they were opened in Hong Kong. I lived for 18 months between HKG-LAX flying EVERY Saturday in one direction or the other (I spent every other week alternating between Hong Kong and L.A. I thought I would die from the amount of traveling I did that first year and even with flying HKG-LAX or visa versa EVERY SAT I still only used 26 round trips that year (1996-97). This guy would have to fly in one direction almost EVERY 2 days to use 75 round trips. No way
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:44 am
  #948  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Originally Posted by bocastephen

My question is what outcome is going to placate the torch and pitchfork crowd - getting a refund of the miles after the trip (while taking the risk this might not happen) or a ETC voucher for some unknown amount valid on future travel?
Uh, how about a trip to HKG in F for 4 miles + tax? :-:

Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
Even a self employed business owner would have no reason for 75 round trips for himself in a year. Before I moved my offices to Dubai, they were opened in Hong Kong. I lived for 18 months between HKG-LAX flying EVERY Saturday in one direction or the other (I spent every other week alternating between Hong Kong and L.A. I thought I would die from the amount of traveling I did that first year and even with flying HKG-LAX or visa versa EVERY SAT I still only used 26 round trips that year (1996-97). This guy would have to fly in one direction almost EVERY 2 days to use 75 round trips. No way
Would you (and others) give the 75 trip thing a break? How do you know he didn't book for family / friends / other FTers who were away from their computers? A long-time (pre-FT) friend is the one who first alerted me to the deal. He was reading about is on his phone, and was away from his computer. I regret not just putting him on our reservation. What's to lose?

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 18, 2012 at 10:55 am Reason: merge
hobo13 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:45 am
  #949  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AUS
Posts: 276
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
This guy would have to fly in one direction almost EVERY 2 days to use 75 round trips. No way
I certainly wouldn't imagine anyone doing that. But what if he booked himself and all his friends for a wedding in Hong Kong or something? Or what if the number was a mistype or some guy trying to have fun with all of us. Bottom line for me - doesn't matter either way.
aschuett is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:45 am
  #950  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 537
Originally Posted by sbm12
Maybe or maybe not. But if there are regulations which govern what they can do then they'll look even more stupid trying to act counter to those rules.
Precisely. Few people are arguing that this wasn't a mistake fare. The DOT have rules about mistake fares. The size of the mistake is a non-issue. If the DOT believes that award flights are the same as paid fares (as has been indicated), then UA will face some large repercussions from DOT.
WhyPayRent is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:55 am
  #951  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
Originally Posted by kokonutz
This is NOT like being given incorrect change by the cashier.

This is like you scan a package of steak at the self-scanner at the grocery, it comes up $0.10 and you put it in your bag, pay and take it home.

You did nothing wrong. You did not steal. You paid what the computer told you to pay. The grocery store has no right to ask for its steak back nor to charge you more for the steak.
Well, let's be fair: Virtually all of us knew the steak would scan at $0.10 even though the price on the sticker said $10.00, which is why we all went shopping for steak at this particular store in the first place.
as219 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 10:57 am
  #952  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by hobo13
I agree. As I said last night (4 pages ago), I am shocked at how the new FT is so divisive about this. When I came to FT a bunch of years ago, there was mostly cheering that a deal would be honored.

I do somewhat wonder if it's a matter of venue. Every forum has a vibe, and MR Deals / Discussion has a much different feel to it, and is frequented by different folks. The UA forum has a lot of business travelers who don't need / want to look for deals, cause they make 1K/GS on the corporate dime. They are sure to have a different view of this when those of us who travel on our own dime.
I'm not sure that's it. As I have said before I didn't get in on this and have no problem with the people who did (with a few exceptions like the 75 ticket guy or the poor elderly frugal traveller who can't make it to the airport fast enough). If UA were just to quietly honor these and everyone would just shut up about it, good for them. My problem is with the self righteous, mud slinging folks that are acting so surprised by UA's reaTction so far and talking about taking them to court, dragging them thru the mud and on and on. My fear is these people's actions may one day hurt us all. ANA will not issue award travel within 3 days of departure, other airlines have similar no close in booking or instant ticketing. Many of us book award travel or especially make changes right up to the date of the flight. If UA is forced to find ways of making sure these kind of mistakes don't happen again, a logical remedy could be something like requiring 48 hours for award tickets to be issued (giving UA plenty of time to review itineraries closely before issuing tickets). This would really hurt those of us that like to use our awards last minute or change flights right up to the very last day. If we bite UA to hard with this they may just bite back and none of us will like the outcome.
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:03 am
  #953  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
If UA is forced to find ways of making sure these kind of mistakes don't happen again, a logical remedy could be something like requiring 48 hours for award tickets to be issued (giving UA plenty of time to review itineraries closely before issuing tickets). This would really hurt those of us that like to use our awards last minute or change flights right up to the very last day. If we bite UA to hard with this they may just bite back and none of us will like the outcome.
It seems to me that United could write code into SHARES preventing automatic ticketing in the case of award tickets booked at fewer than <insert # here> miles. If that were in place here, none of these would have been ticketed in the first place.
GMUJD06 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:04 am
  #954  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by hobo13
Uh, how about a trip to HKG in F for 4 miles + tax? :-:



Would you (and others) give the 75 trip thing a break? How do you know he didn't book for family / friends / other FTers who were away from their computers? A long-time (pre-FT) friend is the one who first alerted me to the deal. He was reading about is on his phone, and was away from his computer. I regret not just putting him on our reservation. What's to lose?
Does not matter. 75 tickets is really pushing the envelope and taking this to the extreme. I have no problem with people that got in on this and either we're planning a trip anyway or even just took advantage of the situation and invited along a few friends, etc. but 75 tickets is ridiculous and there is no justification for it other then pure greed. I really do hope most of you can use your tickets. But if not I guarantee that UA is looking at how many tickets were issued and especially at people who bought 10,20,50 etc. those are the ones that make everyone else look bad
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:04 am
  #955  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
I'm not sure that's it. As I have said before I didn't get in on this and have no problem with the people who did (with a few exceptions like the 75 ticket guy or the poor elderly frugal traveller who can't make it to the airport fast enough). If UA were just to quietly honor these and everyone would just shut up about it, good for them. My problem is with the self righteous, mud slinging folks that are acting so surprised by UA's reaTction so far and talking about taking them to court, dragging them thru the mud and on and on. My fear is these people's actions may one day hurt us all. ANA will not issue award travel within 3 days of departure, other airlines have similar no close in booking or instant ticketing. Many of us book award travel or especially make changes right up to the date of the flight. If UA is forced to find ways of making sure these kind of mistakes don't happen again, a logical remedy could be something like requiring 48 hours for award tickets to be issued (giving UA plenty of time to review itineraries closely before issuing tickets). This would really hurt those of us that like to use our awards last minute or change flights right up to the very last day. If we bite UA to hard with this they may just bite back and none of us will like the outcome.
Mistake fares have happened -- and been honored -- for years now, and a small (but vocal) minority of FTers have threatened all kinds of legal actions if they didn't get their way. To date, the sky has not fallen, and I can't see this straw breaking any camels' backs.
as219 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:05 am
  #956  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,432
The story was just on the WABC radio news at 1:00pm. They said that UA has to honor the tkts according to the DOT Sorry if this posted already. Just jumped on to post.
cruisr is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:06 am
  #957  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by GMUJD06
It seems to me that United could write code into SHARES preventing automatic ticketing in the case of award tickets booked at fewer than <insert # here> miles. If that were in place here, none of these would have been ticketed in the first place.
United can't even write code to keep my reservation intact or to credit me the correct mileage. Don't give them to much credit for what you think they 'can" do
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:07 am
  #958  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,678
Originally Posted by hobo13
I agree. As I said last night (4 pages ago), I am shocked at how the new FT is so divisive about this. When I came to FT a bunch of years ago, there was mostly cheering that a deal would be honored.

I do somewhat wonder if it's a matter of venue. Every forum has a vibe, and MR Deals / Discussion has a much different feel to it, and is frequented by different folks. The UA forum has a lot of business travelers who don't need / want to look for deals, cause they make 1K/GS on the corporate dime. They are sure to have a different view of this when those of us who travel on our own dime.
I haven't been around all that long, but it does surprise me that a website with two forums specifically dedicated to finding, discussing and exploiting hotel and airfare deals including "...possible pricing errors and unusually low fares..." [not to mention the Trick It thread!] would be full of such over the top emotional reactions toward people who are availing themselves of.... a pricing error! So you may be on to something about the different forums.
84fiero is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:08 am
  #959  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by cruisr
The story was just on the WABC radio news at 1:00pm. They said that UA has to honor the tkts according to the DOT Sorry if this posted already. Just jumped on to post.
They might be jumping the gun and basing that report on the DOT spokesman's comments that have already been published (which are not clear)...
tlott is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2012, 11:08 am
  #960  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: United 1K & AA Exec Plat
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by cruisr
The story was just on the WABC radio news at 1:00pm. They said that UA has to honor the tkts according to the DOT Sorry if this posted already. Just jumped on to post.

Well it was kinda said in previous articles online that DOT was in talks with them ans that the rule is htey have to honor it, but what you just said is that the DOT said they HAVE to honor it is that how you heard it or did you just hear it saying that according to a DOT rule they would hae to honor it?
Chucksterace is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.