Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Should passengers refuse UA VDB offers in order to maximize oversale compensation?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Should passengers refuse UA VDB offers in order to maximize oversale compensation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2012, 8:53 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hoboken, NJ; Pembroke Pines, FL
Programs: CO Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,939
Originally Posted by sethb
On the other hand, there have been cases where there's a last-minute no-show and the VDB is boarded, with loss of compensation. If they'd taken the money (cert) and walked away, they'd still be away.
My best VDB on pmCO was taking on on an ERJ145. It was the second-to-the-last flight of the day and hey were looking for one VDB. Everyone was onboard and apparently a late-but-within-limit boarder absolutely needed to be on the flight. I think they offered a $200 voucher and a flight 90 minutes later.

I decided if the other pax really wanted on, I'd help them out and take the VDB, especially since it would just mean that I'd get to the spend the 90 minutes in the President's Club instead of the Hampton Inn on my arrival - and in fact that I'd just eat dinner at IAH instead of at some chain restaurant in Norman, OK. IAH has pretty good food so it's a win for me.

Best part of the story: As they are processing the voucher, word comes that the flight is going to take a mechanical! The junior gate agent looks at the senior gate agent, who looks at me, smiles, and says, "Finish processing this gentleman's voucher and then we'll rebook everyone on the next flight."

The next flight was a 735 and had plenty of room for everyone. I think I even got the upgrade to F!

On the original topic, I don't think there's anything wrong with holding out for higher compensation. I think that people collectively will generally think the same thing, but $300 is a lot of money for some people and not everyone is going to get the VDB so I can't begrudge them taking the offer despite the fact that I think we should all hold out for an amount that I think is significant to me. [Editorial note: Depending on the situation, I'd find $300 to be enough. Heck, in the situation the OP describes I think $800 is fine if the reaccomodation is in C. At around $1000, though, I start to think about doing things that are potentially embarassing to me like those Fear Factor contestants]

Originally Posted by rob_flies_ua
From what I've seen, it's now pretty much first come first serve but still GAs discretion as to ease of rebooking and needs of the operation. With PMUA, even though the list was sorted it was always GA's discretion as to who to choose. I've watched non-status members get chosen over 1Ks because the non-status member just wanted to fly out the next morning, didn't need an upgrade, didn't need any compensation. Can't blame the GA for choosing that passenger. I've watched a pair of passengers get chosen over at least 1 individual 1K and 1 other individual passenger because they needed 2 seats and rebooking the pair was easier.
You people [My peoples ] will call me a collaborator, but I often tell the agent that if they really need to bump someone, I'd do it but that if they find more enthusiastic volunteers they should pick them first because I don't need the money that much.

Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
You'll always have people not angry w UA ready to take the $800. Kettles, people that don't normally fly UA ............ME! (guess that makes me a customer SCAB
I was thinking that the OP wants us passengers to form a union to collectively bargain for a better deal.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 4, 2012 at 9:02 am Reason: merge
lensman is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 9:20 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,037
Originally Posted by davef139
Seems good in theory, but in practice its not worth the time to start sorting out peoples status. If you have an oversell its going to be easier to just bump out the first few people rather then take everyones names sort them out then worry about trying to redo.
Personally I don't want to end up getting delayed due to the GA is sitting there getting rejected by the pax since the rebook isn't going to work and has to scroll through a list of potential people. This will hold if they want to help maintain ontime performance.
My last vdb I took I was bumped over an hour before departure with an oversell of 1 seat, this was before the inbound was even landed.
With PMUA the computer did all the "sorting" ahead of time. No effort or time consumed by the GA. It also benefited the GAs because pax could get on the volunteer list well ahead of time so the GA could work out their protection IN ADVANCE. This also helped when volunteering pax were coming into an airport with a short connection.

Many times I'd arrive at a gate coming off of an inbound flight with a short connection having put myself on the VDB list at an earlier airport HOURS ahead of time. I'd note to the GA that I was on their volunteer list and they had already processed the vouchers and a rerouted itin for me! No muss, no fuss, and even less effort and time consumed during the critical 60 minutes prior to departure than is needed with the current all manual sorting system.
PHLGovFlyer is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 9:57 am
  #78  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K/MM, AA GLD
Posts: 1,709
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
Yes, I really do think that elites should get priority for VDBs.
I'll agree with this statement, but I'll state a slightly more honest reason: it means that I'm more likely to be bumped, and more likely to be bumped earlier in the process giving me better re-route options. I'll admit that my desire for elites to at least be considered first for VDBs is based purely on self-interest and not try to gussy it up with how I want prioritization because it's somehow better for the airline.

Edit to add: that gussying up isn't directed at you PHLGovFlyer, sorry if it reads that way.
rob_flies_ua is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 10:42 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Originally Posted by Baze
Good luck getting a VDB amount greater than the predefined IDB amount.
Actually, I would expect VDB compensation to exceed IDB cost on a regular basis.

- There is a customer satisfaction component to NOT IDBing someone
- There is an airline performace component - IDBs are tracked and reported publicly
- The cost to the airline of the VDB voucher is far below the face value. The VDB coupon won't always be used, and even if it is used, it's used on air travel on the same airline. That promotes the customer flying the airline again, AND the cost to the airline of flying one additional passenger is very low. So in many cases, they give a voucher to a kettle who wouldn't have flown the airline again and have to fly that kettle later, so the airline doesn't really lose out on anything but the marginal passenger cost, and may come out ahead with bag fees etc.

That does, however, mean it's generally a bad idea for the airline to VDB elites. There they really ARE losing the revenue when the VDB gets redeemed for airfare that would normally have been paid for with cash.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 12:26 pm
  #80  
Used to be PWMRamper
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ATL
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 999
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
PMUA's system was very effective. There was a computerized list that could be accessed by any GA anywhere and any traveler could be added for any flight. No jostling in a line, no hovering by the gate. Simply get on the list, depart the lounge, show up at the gate about 10 minutes prior to boarding and speak to the GA. The list was already prioritized by status, however, the GA for a particular flight could use their discretion and take a lower or non-status pax if it made more sense operationally or cost wise. I was "jumped" by non-status pax on the VDB list several times as a 1k because (for example) I would have needed a hotel and the non-status pax did not.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the old VDB list did not sort by status.

I always thought it did, but one day last summer I had a good 80 minutes to turn around a CR7, and along with an FT'er flying out, we experimented. The VDB list was always who was added first, status had no bearing.


And just for your information, we do have a list now that anyone can be added to at any time, from anyone. I haven't worked too many oversales yet, so I can't speak as to how that list is sorted.
MSPGabe is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 12:32 pm
  #81  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,680
Originally Posted by lensman
[Editorial note: Depending on the situation, I'd find $300 to be enough. Heck, in the situation the OP describes I think $800 is fine if the reaccomodation is in C. At around $1000, though, I start to think about doing things that are potentially embarassing to me like those Fear Factor contestants]
Whoa there, nobody ever promised me reaccommodation in C. I never asked the GA, actually, exactly how I would be reaccommodated, if I was removed from the flight. Is it normal procedure to give volunteers a seat in a higher cabin? I was actually afraid that, instead of an E+ window seat, I'd get stuck in an E- middle seat on the next day's flight (that's the only thing that the GA did confirm, that I would be back home a full day late).
STS-134 is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 12:37 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K/MM, AA GLD
Posts: 1,709
Originally Posted by STS-134
Whoa there, nobody ever promised me reaccommodation in C. I never asked the GA, actually, exactly how I would be reaccommodated, if I was removed from the flight. Is it normal procedure to give volunteers a seat in a higher cabin? I was actually afraid that, instead of an E+ window seat, I'd get stuck in an E- middle seat on the next day's flight (that's the only thing that the GA did confirm, that I would be back home a full day late).
If you make a good seat (which depends for me on how long the flight is, equipment on rebooking, if it's a redeye, if I have to be at work at a certain time, etc, etc - might mean an upgraded seat, an exit row, anything close to the front, or whatever) a condition of being offloaded, then either you get it, or you don't agree to be VDBed.
rob_flies_ua is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 1:04 pm
  #83  
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 17,976
Originally Posted by PWMRamper
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the old VDB list did not sort by status.

I always thought it did, but one day last summer I had a good 80 minutes to turn around a CR7, and along with an FT'er flying out, we experimented. The VDB list was always who was added first, status had no bearing.


And just for your information, we do have a list now that anyone can be added to at any time, from anyone. I haven't worked too many oversales yet, so I can't speak as to how that list is sorted.
I totally disagree. I have seen the list many times, and it was sorted by status. I have also arrived at the gate and asked to be put on the list. The agent said that they had enough volunteers. I told them to humor me and please do it. Voila, I was the first one on the list because of my status.
iluv2fly is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 2:00 pm
  #84  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: STL
Programs: MR LT Titanium, UA 1K, DL Gold, AA EXP
Posts: 886
Having been part of a hellacious 2006 bumpfest to LHR, I'm very glad they do VDB. It was during the World Cup, and all the flights were booked full. I took 6 bumps over 2 days, and they still were IDBing people like crazy from each flight.

Want to see something awful? Watch for someone's parents who have never flown internationally, and are on their 30th / 40th anniversary trip, get IDBed at the beginning of their "trip of a lifetime."

We Flyertalkers are used to international trips. We need to realize that most people, especially Americans, are not. It's a BIG deal to them, and a HUGE headache if they don't get where they're going when they expect to.
dartagnan is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 3:10 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
I don't recall if it sorted by status...my guess is it did, but that realy didn't matter. People got added to it all the time in many different places, oversold or not. My procedure was to make an announcement, regardless of if there as a list or not, when oversold, find out who it would be easiest/cheapest to reaccomodate, work the numbers so if I needed 3 an had (2) groups of 2, a grp of 4, and a group of 1 that volunteered, that I would b able to not remove more or less than was necessary, call them all up, and discussth options, an do whatever was operationaly and economicaly efficient.
If I could get the right number of volunteers who required no re-ticketing, no overnight/meal accomodations, and no luggage being rerouted/ left on a baggage carrousel, then regardelss of status or fare paid, those would be the ones I would pick. Since there is no obligation to accept any paticular vdb, if someone's alternate transportaton required a rerutin, bein put on another over full plane, baggage being pulled, hotls/meals, they woul fall lower on my list of who to choose, regardless of status of fare paid.

Whatever order the computer put them in was irrelevant as there is no programable formula for the computer to decide who is a "best" pick given all of the variables, including the actual number of seats needed after everyone has boaded.
fastair is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 7:59 pm
  #86  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,037
Originally Posted by rob_flies_ua
I'll agree with this statement, but I'll state a slightly more honest reason: it means that I'm more likely to be bumped, and more likely to be bumped earlier in the process giving me better re-route options. I'll admit that my desire for elites to at least be considered first for VDBs is based purely on self-interest and not try to gussy it up with how I want prioritization because it's somehow better for the airline.

Edit to add: that gussying up isn't directed at you PHLGovFlyer, sorry if it reads that way.
No problem, and I'm with you on it being largely about self interest.

Originally Posted by PWMRamper
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the old VDB list did not sort by status.

I always thought it did, but one day last summer I had a good 80 minutes to turn around a CR7, and along with an FT'er flying out, we experimented. The VDB list was always who was added first, status had no bearing.


And just for your information, we do have a list now that anyone can be added to at any time, from anyone. I haven't worked too many oversales yet, so I can't speak as to how that list is sorted.
Originally Posted by iluv2fly
I totally disagree. I have seen the list many times, and it was sorted by status. I have also arrived at the gate and asked to be put on the list. The agent said that they had enough volunteers. I told them to humor me and please do it. Voila, I was the first one on the list because of my status.
Ditto. Numerous times with PMUA I would be added to the list late in the process and yet routinely be called to the podium first when it came time to negotiate a VDB. All the while watching others that had been added to the list before me being boarded and not VDB'd. Maybe the "list" wasn't really sorted by status and the GAs were just doing their thing and being accommodating of higher status pax. Regardless, the effect was the same.

PWM I do understand that you currently have a computerized list available to you. I also understand that it is routinely not used or it is ignored for various reasons by a large number of GAs.

Originally Posted by fastair
I don't recall if it sorted by status...my guess is it did, but that realy didn't matter. People got added to it all the time in many different places, oversold or not. My procedure was to make an announcement, regardless of if there as a list or not, when oversold, find out who it would be easiest/cheapest to reaccomodate, work the numbers so if I needed 3 an had (2) groups of 2, a grp of 4, and a group of 1 that volunteered, that I would b able to not remove more or less than was necessary, call them all up, and discussth options, an do whatever was operationaly and economicaly efficient.
If I could get the right number of volunteers who required no re-ticketing, no overnight/meal accomodations, and no luggage being rerouted/ left on a baggage carrousel, then regardelss of status or fare paid, those would be the ones I would pick. Since there is no obligation to accept any paticular vdb, if someone's alternate transportaton required a rerutin, bein put on another over full plane, baggage being pulled, hotls/meals, they woul fall lower on my list of who to choose, regardless of status of fare paid.

Whatever order the computer put them in was irrelevant as there is no programable formula for the computer to decide who is a "best" pick given all of the variables, including the actual number of seats needed after everyone has boaded.
I understand and it was and should always be a given that the GA has discretion to choose whichever pax works best for the particular VDB situation at hand. That being said, there are a great many situations where there isn't much distinction between pax in terms of those items you mention such as baggage, hotels, etc., and in those cases I still think status should be a factor in selecting pax for VDBs.
PHLGovFlyer is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 8:37 pm
  #87  
Used to be PWMRamper
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ATL
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 999
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
Ditto. Numerous times with PMUA I would be added to the list late in the process and yet routinely be called to the podium first when it came time to negotiate a VDB. All the while watching others that had been added to the list before me being boarded and not VDB'd. Maybe the "list" wasn't really sorted by status and the GAs were just doing their thing and being accommodating of higher status pax. Regardless, the effect was the same.
I would try and give VDB's to Status pax for a few reasons. One being you get to know your regular travelers and they're usually pretty cooperative. Secondly, they tend to be much more flexible with stuff like routings.

The list certainly wasn't, and isn't set in stone. We frequently jump around on the list depending on plenty of the factors that have been mentioned.
MSPGabe is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 9:34 pm
  #88  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Originally Posted by raehl311
- There is an airline performace component - IDBs are tracked and reported publicly

As are voluntaries.
cordelli is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 11:42 pm
  #89  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by cordelli
As are voluntaries.
But when deciding if I want to buy a ticket on a particular airline, IDBs count against them, and VDBs count for them.
sethb is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2012, 11:47 pm
  #90  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
No problem, and I'm with you on it being largely about self interest.





Ditto. Numerous times with PMUA I would be added to the list late in the process and yet routinely be called to the podium first when it came time to negotiate a VDB. All the while watching others that had been added to the list before me being boarded and not VDB'd. Maybe the "list" wasn't really sorted by status and the GAs were just doing their thing and being accommodating of higher status pax. Regardless, the effect was the same.

PWM I do understand that you currently have a computerized list available to you. I also understand that it is routinely not used or it is ignored for various reasons by a large number of GAs.



I understand and it was and should always be a given that the GA has discretion to choose whichever pax works best for the particular VDB situation at hand. That being said, there are a great many situations where there isn't much distinction between pax in terms of those items you mention such as baggage, hotels, etc., and in those cases I still think status should be a factor in selecting pax for VDBs.
From a business standpoint, inverse status would be the way to go. Way more breakage from the guy that stashes it away and only rediscovers is 18 months later after it expired then from the frequent flyer who books a ticket with it that same week.

Breakage=free oversell. Usage by a customer who was going to buy a ticket anyway=lost revenue.

And I disagree with pwmramper. I work more flights in a shift than pwm (love the place, sister married there) sees in a day. I guarantee you, the soldier with no ff status who volunteers is far less demanding than a vdb gamer/ frequent flyer. They see the $400 travel credit, know that will get them a vacation, and is willing to fit for 6 hours. He isn't gonna ask for us to send his $$ to another carrier, isn't gonna ask for a free upgrade, he sees the offer, likes it, and accepts it as us with no extra requests except to use the phone

Last edited by fastair; Jul 4, 2012 at 11:55 pm
fastair is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.