![]() |
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 33028599)
So absolute numbers of tests and positives are higher but the percentages of positives are lower? That’s the thing you were referring to as being better than September?
it’s an odd thing to pick as your standard. I don’t remember any lockdown being justified on the basis of percentages of positive test results. I thought it was all based on absolute numbers of people in hospital and numbers of deaths.
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33028615)
Lol. Do you know how to read the data? Deaths today are averaging 830 over the last 7 days. In September it was 50. Do you think 830 is a smaller number than 50?
no it’s cases. More cases = more ppl in hospital = more deaths deaths are 830 because there were a lot of cases 3 weeks ago not now |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33028899)
no it’s cases. More cases = more ppl in hospital = more deaths
deaths are 830 because there were a lot of cases 3 weeks ago not now |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33028899)
no it’s cases. More cases = more ppl in hospital = more deaths
deaths are 830 because there were a lot of cases 3 weeks ago not now You are saying that the only reason we have more cases is due to mass testing. That is correct, there were probably hundreds of thousands cases undetected. Are you saying there are thousands of deaths that happened in September that just went undetected? Your logic is less testing results in less cases - fine. But people don't enter hospital and die completely undetected. Not tens of thousands. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33028936)
So there are "more cases = more ppl in hospitals = more deaths" - by your very own words.
You are saying that the only reason we have more cases is due to mass testing. That is correct, there were probably hundreds of thousands cases undetected. Are you saying there are thousands of deaths that happened in September that just went undetected? Your logic is less testing results in less cases - fine. But people don't enter hospital and die completely undetected. Not tens of thousands. An earlier post bears repeating: logic and reasoned arguments really won't help you in these discussions. |
Originally Posted by IAN-UK
(Post 33029031)
An earlier post bears repeating: logic and reasoned arguments really won't help you in these discussions.
|
Again, what I am saying is the case levels are low right now. Deaths and hospitalisations will take time to decrease.
|
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33029055)
Again, what I am saying is the case levels are low right now. Deaths and hospitalisations will take time to decrease.
|
Originally Posted by alex67500
(Post 33029074)
So let's give hospitals and care workers a bit of a breather and keep still for a little longer.
The way these conversations are going is as if we haven't vaccinated anyone yet and we are approaching winter. Spring is coming soon and so is more and more vaccines. Open up the UK! Liberate! |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33029094)
If cases are low when you open kind of unlikely that the hospitalisations will suddenly shoot up.
The way these conversations are going is as if we haven't vaccinated anyone yet and we are approaching winter. Spring is coming soon and so is more and more vaccines. Open up the UK! Liberate! |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33029268)
I want things opened up ASAP and desperately want to travel in April/May and summer. But the government has effectively all but ruled out any foreign travel before September/October. What makes you think travel will be opened up anytime in the next 3 - 4 months? It's a genuine question, because it is clear that Covid-0 is now the goal before travel opened up. Unless you know something no one here knows, travel is pretty much dead this year, and definitely this summer.
|
No one has said "no travel before October". They've said "it's too early to make plans" and indeed it is too early.
On February 22nd (or thereabouts, Boris ain't famous for punctuality) they'll present a plan. Then we'll know more. |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33030052)
No one has said "no travel before October". They've said "it's too early to make plans" and indeed it is too early.
On February 22nd (or thereabouts, Boris ain't famous for punctuality) they'll present a plan. Then we'll know more. |
It's not too early to book as long as it's fully refundable or transferable to lock in a good price or a nice villa like I've done to avoid a mad scramble.
I don't want a holiday in the UK either sorry, long weekend I've booked is fine. |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 33030052)
No one has said "no travel before October". They've said "it's too early to make plans" and indeed it is too early.
On February 22nd (or thereabouts, Boris ain't famous for punctuality) they'll present a plan. Then we'll know more. |
What worries me is they will say it will have to be after over 50's jabbed due by the end of April hopefully then add another 3 weeks on for immunity so that wipes out May.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.