Local lockdowns in the UK
#886
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Cyprus is planning after March 1 allowing all passengers with negative test before departure and rapid one after landing to skip quarantine all together. We can assume Spain and Greece will do similar. Health is a priority until countries run out of money.
Even with the local lockdown now weather is cold so easier for people to 'stay home'. In march? Not so much.
I don't think hotels for SA and BR is much of an issue to manage can't be more than a few flights a day to meet at the arrival gate.
#887
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,299
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
#888
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 43,021
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
#889
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
#890
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
Perhaps I misunderstood what you are trying to say but I fail to see the relevance of touristic countries opening to the feasibility of a hotel quarantine system. People are not going to go away on holidays when the weather gets warmer if they have to face a two-week enforced hotel quarantine at their own expenses when coming back. A hotel quarantine system would mean that only truly essential travel would take place.
#891
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,345
Spanish government were quoted on the entry restrictions thread saying that they wouldn't open up to countries outside the EU until 70% of their adult population were vaccinated, and the ETA is end of September.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
With Merkel's proposal to block all arrivals from outside the EU, I doubt residents of Britain will be allowed anywhere this summer.
#892
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Perhaps I misunderstood what you are trying to say but I fail to see the relevance of touristic countries opening to the feasibility of a hotel quarantine system. People are not going to go away on holidays when the weather gets warmer if they have to face a two-week enforced hotel quarantine at their own expenses when coming back. A hotel quarantine system would mean that only truly essential travel would take place.
#893
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 43,021
Even when local movement restrictions are lifted in the UK, do you think the requirement to have tests and self isolate on arrival in to Europe, and more tests and self isolation on return will keep numbers down?
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs.
Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list.
The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that.
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs.
Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list.
The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that.
#894
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK.
#895
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Even when local movement restrictions are lifted in the UK, do you think the requirement to have tests and self isolate on arrival in to Europe, and more tests and self isolation on return will keep numbers down?
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs.
Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list.
The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that.
You also seem to think there is no effect on reducing travel if hotel enforced quarantine is brought in and that the 10,000 figure doesn't reduce, and in fact goes up regardless. I can't see many people travelling if they are required to spend 10 days in a hotel at their own cost on arrival in to the UK. Doesn't sound like a fun holiday to me tbh. I am not sure what this minimum of 10,000 people is that doesn't go down regardless of what measures are brought in. Most won't want to travel if it means bills of £500+ per person on tests and hotels on top of normal costs.
Even if targeted rather than all arrivals, there is no guarantee these concerning strains won't appear in Spain/Italy/Greece etc, and arrivals from those countries are added to the list.
The recent mood music atm from the UK government seems to be focused on vaccination and reopening the domestic economy, not towards international travel or trade. Enabling travel for holiday abroad, with the potential of bringing back new strains simply isn't part of that.
also govt said Covid is here forever, so if we worried about strains then the borders will be closed forever! Clearly won’t happen, despite the best wishes of some people.
uk is too connected for blanket hotel quarantine. It’s not realistic to have one for everyone, especially with no end in sight.
you are completely wrong about international travel and trade as the uk is very very reliant on it. Why do you think the uk has such a liberal border policy? Even now all nationals can fly in with limited exceptions such as BR and SA arrivals for 10 days. Otherwise it’s 5 with a test 10 without.
10,000 arrivals during lockdown. Without lockdown and a more open world, much much higher. The border argument is only being led by people such as Hancock and Patel, you ask Sunak and Shapps and they will say not possible for blanket bans forvevwr.
someone has to pay the bill eventually and that would mean a global Britain.
as daily mail called it, having a few countries not many ppl travel to on the hotel quarantine won’t change much at all, so it’s not much of a story as they are making it to be.
it’s like people calling for a stricter lockdown in the uk as cases are not falling enough, just a lot of hot air from people with nothing better to do except criticise and ignore the reality of the situation from all sides (economy, jobs, health of younger people, etc) it’s all
about finding a balance
Last edited by ahmetdouas; Jan 24, 2021 at 11:36 am
#896
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 43,021
I think once the meaningless phrase "global Britain" is mentioned as a justification for something, it is time for me to leave the debate
#897
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
lets see what happens in the end. The UK was never big on enforcement anyway. The government is more practical than many ppl think, especially against the ones asking for ‘shutdown everything forever’ and ‘close the airports’. They aren’t in power and never will be.
#898
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
And if you think that international trade is not a good indicator and something like tourism is more important, tourism represents approximately 11% of UK GDP. By way of comparison, it is around 18% of GDP for Hong Kong or for New Zealand.
I am not sure on what the idea that the UK is uniquely reliant on international travel compared to countries with stricter restrictions on entry seems to be based but I struggle to find an objective basis for it.
It seems to me that it is a choice that the UK could make if it wanted to, albeit at an economic cost. It is not a choice I would welcome and it still seems to me, notwithstanding the noises around it, still rather at the low end of probabilities but I think that we need to open our eyes that it is not quite as impossible as some might suggest.
#899
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Hong Kong and SIngapore are two of the three countries most dependent on international trade. Do you want to go and check what their rules are regarding entry into the country?
And if you think that international trade is not a good indicator and something like tourism is more important, tourism represents approximately 11% of UK GDP. By way of comparison, it is around 18% of GDP for Hong Kong or for New Zealand.
I am not sure on what the idea that the UK is uniquely reliant on international travel compared to countries with stricter restrictions on entry seems to be based but I struggle to find an objective basis for it.
It seems to me that it is a choice that the UK could make if it wanted to, albeit at an economic cost. It is not a choice I would welcome and it still seems to me, notwithstanding the noises around it, still rather at the low end of probabilities but I think that we need to open our eyes that it is not quite as impossible as some might suggest.
And if you think that international trade is not a good indicator and something like tourism is more important, tourism represents approximately 11% of UK GDP. By way of comparison, it is around 18% of GDP for Hong Kong or for New Zealand.
I am not sure on what the idea that the UK is uniquely reliant on international travel compared to countries with stricter restrictions on entry seems to be based but I struggle to find an objective basis for it.
It seems to me that it is a choice that the UK could make if it wanted to, albeit at an economic cost. It is not a choice I would welcome and it still seems to me, notwithstanding the noises around it, still rather at the low end of probabilities but I think that we need to open our eyes that it is not quite as impossible as some might suggest.
Also Singapore and Hong Kong are much stricter countries than the UK, it's a completely different approach society-wise.
The UK government is keeping expectations low, while the rumours are getting at peak level. E.g. UK government specifically said no lockdown decisions until Feb 15 and we will see then, but we have speculation about schools, restrictions, travel, all sorts.
On a positive note, it seems UK could exceed its target of 15 million vaccinations in Mid-Feb.
#900
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BRS
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 4,996
If it is anything like the PPE contracts, there will be someone friends with some MP who miraculously sets up some isolation hotel booking service for which they can get millions in government contracts.