![]() |
Originally Posted by Derek
(Post 16562099)
Probably. From what I know about drafting of regulations, it is easy to add but near impossible to delete....
|
Originally Posted by TropicalTripper
(Post 16556426)
That's unfortunate. It seems like if the capability exists to have two passports on file now, you'd be able to add the official one. According to the officer who interviewed me, CBP doesn't need to see or verify the new passport. I can just go onto the GOES site and make the change myself. I wonder if contacting the CBP obudsman might help.
If youever pass through IAD, you could try swinging by the GOES enrollment center there. I'm sure the CBP officers at IAD are quite accustomed to seeing AMCITs with Diplomatic and Official passports in addition to their tourist PPTs. |
Originally Posted by alexb133
(Post 16556697)
Lol. You should be accepted then. I know for a fact that the only thing that will totally exclude you from trusted traveler programs is history of usage of any drugs.
Been through 14 countries in past 12 months, never had any problems except with US (coming back from STT), and going into Canada (speeding tickets). So not getting GE wont be a huge loss =/ though it is kinda frustrating. |
Originally Posted by xolinlevh
(Post 16564689)
Finally after a month of waiting i got an updated, denied, again. I'm just gonna give up and not burn another $100 trying again. As nice as GE would have been it wasnt super critical for me, only reason i tried it in the first place was because Amex now comps the first $100 fee.
Been through 14 countries in past 12 months, never had any problems except with US (coming back from STT), and going into Canada (speeding tickets). So not getting GE wont be a huge loss =/ though it is kinda frustrating. |
Originally Posted by xolinlevh
(Post 16564689)
Finally after a month of waiting i got an updated, denied, again. I'm just gonna give up and not burn another $100 trying again. As nice as GE would have been it wasnt super critical for me, only reason i tried it in the first place was because Amex now comps the first $100 fee.
|
Originally Posted by alexb133
(Post 16565068)
I'm very sorry to hear that. Did they state a reason for their denial?
|
Originally Posted by alexb133
(Post 16565068)
I'm very sorry to hear that. Did they state a reason for their denial?
@Derek, the you can appeal by contacting a local office and setting up an appointment with a supervisor (which prob wont do because there isn't a location in MSP). I was only really interested in GE for helping expedite my solo international travel (makes up about 50% of my intl trips) most of which are MRs anyway. and when i travel with others, they don't have GE so I'd end up waiting just as long anyway. I just don't get how any of this can be reason to refuse membership. If i had been arrested for something like drugs, crime syndicate connections, smuggling, fraud, stuff that has international connections or is a threat to the US, then i'd understand. But a stupid theft charge from when i wasn't even a teenager yet, and even once i put it on in the 2nd application....still? |
Originally Posted by xolinlevh
(Post 16567385)
They quoted the same reason as before, citing "falsifying" information as grounds for refusal.
GE = trusted traveler program omitting information when applying was considered a form of "lying or falsifying." As a result, you can't be trusted. They have every possible bit of info on all of us. It is always better to admit to what happened and talk your way out of it, than simply omitting it thinking they will not know.... We are dealing with a gov. org. They have the upper hand. --J |
Originally Posted by xolinlevh
(Post 16552111)
It did not, I took a video game from target when I was 12.....
|
Originally Posted by jcf27
(Post 16567546)
Sorry to hear the news....
GE = trusted traveler program omitting information when applying was considered a form of "lying or falsifying." As a result, you can't be trusted. They have every possible bit of info on all of us. It is always better to admit to what happened and talk your way out of it, than simply omitting it thinking they will not know.... We are dealing with a gov. org. They have the upper hand. --J |
Originally Posted by alexb133
(Post 16556697)
I know for a fact that the only thing that will totally exclude you from trusted traveler programs is history of usage of any drugs.
Originally Posted by drewguy
(Post 16562950)
Can you imagine the unnecessary firestorm that would result when someone proposed to drop any restriction on Nazis from some regulations? It's politically easier not to touch it.
More to the point, I'd suspect that if they dropped any questions about Nazis or National Socialists, no one would notice, especially if this was more than, say, five years from now.
Originally Posted by jcf27
(Post 16567546)
omitting information when applying was considered a form of "lying or falsifying." As a result, you can't be trusted.
|
Originally Posted by anabolism
(Post 16568632)
I know several people who were approved despite a history of pot smoking during their younger years.
|
Quick question:
My traveling partner and I would both like to apply for GE in the near future. We have an outbound international flight departing from SFO two hours after our domestic connection is scheduled to land. If conditionally approved would it be possible to complete two interviews and still have enough time to make it to our intl gate in that two-hour time frame? |
Originally Posted by Gutenstein
(Post 16569452)
Quick question:
My traveling partner and I would both like to apply for GE in the near future. We have an outbound international flight departing from SFO two hours after our domestic connection is scheduled to land. If conditionally approved would it be possible to complete two interviews and still have enough time to make it to our intl gate in that two-hour time frame? |
Originally Posted by Gutenstein
(Post 16569452)
Quick question:
My traveling partner and I would both like to apply for GE in the near future. We have an outbound international flight departing from SFO two hours after our domestic connection is scheduled to land. If conditionally approved would it be possible to complete two interviews and still have enough time to make it to our intl gate in that two-hour time frame? The other thing is if you are delayed in flight, there is no way to notify cbp and you get flagged as a no show, which could invalidate your ability to make a new appt and require a new application. They posted guidelines about the appt which you may want to check out. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:53 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.