Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Bose QC35 Released: Wireless and USB Rechargeable

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Bose QC35 Released: Wireless and USB Rechargeable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2016, 2:30 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kirkland, WA, USA
Programs: Marriott Gold; LEGO VIP, Amex Platinum, HHonors Gold
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
I appreciate the review, but isn't the lack of a wire THE primary feature of these headphones?

On that note, though, I do love the Bluetooth adapter for my QC25's. Agree with all your points and benefits of not having a wire in the way.
You are correct, but the difference is so night-and-day for someone as tangled as me that just hearing "there's no wire" really doesn't do the feature justice.

I have friends who have their wires all organized and never seem to be tangled up. This feature really won't improve their lives very much. I'm not them, so for me, this is the killer feature that's hiding in plain sight
CRAZ8 is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2016, 3:54 pm
  #92  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AUS
Posts: 276
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
I do love the Bluetooth adapter for my QC25's
That adapter is really nice, but for me not having that thing twisting around (on the 15s at least) or being afraid it will snap off is great. Really, it's all so minor. It wasn't too long ago there was no consumer noise cancelling, and we just had those stupid tube headphones the airline provided. I'll take my QC15 or QC35 over nothing any day ^
aschuett is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2016, 10:48 pm
  #93  
KCZ
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MHT/BOS
Posts: 104
Random observation

I just discovered that these do nothing to cancel the sound of a downpour on the roof. Having them over my ears muffles the noise a bit, but there is no cancellation effect. I can also hear thunder pretty clearly.
KCZ is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2016, 9:36 pm
  #94  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
Originally Posted by KCZ
I just discovered that these do nothing to cancel the sound of a downpour on the roof. Having them over my ears muffles the noise a bit, but there is no cancellation effect. I can also hear thunder pretty clearly.
Turn on some light music.
WIRunner is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2016, 2:22 am
  #95  
-DSH-
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AMS
Programs: BDDC Gold, MR Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Diamond, EK Plat
Posts: 437
This product has been out for a month or two now, can anyone please comment on how they find them two months in? My ear cups of my QC15s are worn down and begging to be replaced, and thought I may as well upgrade to QC35. Especially if anyone has had QC15s in the past, would love to hear from you.
777-9X is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:37 pm
  #96  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: ATL/MCO
Programs: Costco Executive, RaceTrac Sultan of Soda, Chick-fil-A Red
Posts: 5,665
Is it worth the extra $50 for the QC35's instead of the QC25's? Thinking of buying either pair so tell me which you'd take.
miamiflyer8 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:41 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt LT DM, Wyndham DM, Hertz PC, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,038
Originally Posted by miamiflyer8
Is it worth the extra $50 for the QC35's instead of the QC25's? Thinking of buying either pair so tell me which you'd take.
Wireless isn't great IMO so I'd skip it. QC25s here.
dinanm3atl is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:42 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: ATL/MCO
Programs: Costco Executive, RaceTrac Sultan of Soda, Chick-fil-A Red
Posts: 5,665
Originally Posted by dinanm3atl
Wireless isn't great IMO so I'd skip it. QC25s here.
Thanks for the quick reply, I will look into them.
miamiflyer8 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 6:52 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: London
Posts: 172
Originally Posted by dinanm3atl
Wireless isn't great IMO so I'd skip it. QC25s here.
What does that mean?IMO based on what?

QC35 are as good sound wise (or better) and they are wireless.
There are no connection issues so I can't see why when you spend $300 already to not spend another $50 to get the freedom from wires.
michalis is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 7:06 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
Originally Posted by michalis
What does that mean?IMO based on what?

QC35 are as good sound wise (or better) and they are wireless.
There are no connection issues so I can't see why when you spend $300 already to not spend another $50 to get the freedom from wires.
Until they charge themselves from sunlight or the all-pervasive aether, you're not experiencing "freedom from wires."

And sound quality is entirely subjective, so "IMO" is a completely reasonable basis for that statement.
Dodge DeBoulet is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 8:07 am
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
They don't have the same sound profile of the QC25s when used in wireless mode. Here's a rather simple explanation why:

http://www.cnet.com/news/can-aptx-gi...ver-bluetooth/

The bottom line is this: Bose QC35s are SBC, not aptX. Though the phones themselves may have the same sound profile as the non-Bluetooth QC25, when used wireless, you're listening to significantly degraded audio. If you listen to music from your phone (which is a general purpose device and doesn't deliver HD audio), listening over Bluetooth will degrade the audio but you probably won't notice. On the other, if, like me, you use an HD player (I have a Fiio X5ii), you most certainly will notice the difference between Bluetooth and wired.

Bose phones are only so-so with respect to sound quality, but industry-leading noise cancellation is a worthwhile trade-off (and no other active noise-cancellation phones have better audio quality). However, Bose's implementation of Bluetooth only transforms them from so-so phones to wireless considerably-less-than-so-so phones. This may not matter to many people, but I think everyone should know exactly what it is that they're buying.
PTravel is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 8:26 am
  #102  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: American AAdvantage
Posts: 1,046
Originally Posted by miamiflyer8
Is it worth the extra $50 for the QC35's instead of the QC25's? Thinking of buying either pair so tell me which you'd take.
Although I recently bought the QC25 for the ability to replace the battery on the fly, the QC35 would be a preferable option if you're looking to purchase a smartphone which requires an adapter to connect to a wired headphone.
Sant is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 8:52 am
  #103  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: ATL/MCO
Programs: Costco Executive, RaceTrac Sultan of Soda, Chick-fil-A Red
Posts: 5,665
Originally Posted by Sant
Although I recently bought the QC25 for the ability to replace the battery on the fly, the QC35 would be a preferable option if you're looking to purchase a smartphone which requires an adapter to connect to a wired headphone.
You all have valid points for pros and cons between the 25's and 35's, my deciding factor will be whether or not I'm in the mood to spend $50 extra.
miamiflyer8 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2016, 9:35 am
  #104  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
Charging them once every couple of weeks sounds pretty much like freedom to me.
The problem is that batteries tend to go dead while you're using them. And you can't use the QC35s when you're recharging them. On the other hand, a fresh AAA immediately brings the QC25s back to life.

That's freedom to me.

May I suggest you use a battery charger permanently attached to your phone via a charging cable since it's no big deal to you obviously.
Battery life on my phone is actually pretty outstanding. But I still plan for extended periods in the air by making sure it's appropriately charged before I board.

You have the option of using the cable too if you want to be wired.
And if I want to be wired, I can save at least $50 as well.

As for the "IMO" it's not subjective when they have pretty much exactly the same sound profile as the QC25s that he/she suggests.
See PTravel's excellent response.

Last edited by gfunkdave; Sep 15, 2016 at 11:44 am Reason: Removed personal exchange
Dodge DeBoulet is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2016, 8:20 am
  #105  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2
I've owned both the qc25 and the qc35. The qc35 are superior by leaps and bounds for my usage. The wireless is incredible. That feature alone is worth an additional $200 to me. I think it's rather crazy to get the wired version. Keep in mind that the 35s come with a wire which doubles your battery time to 40 hours. I can't imagine needing to use these headphones for 40 hours without having an opportunity to charge.
rekopter is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.