Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Special Interest Travel > Travel with Children
Reload this Page >

Breastfeeding Mother Embarrassed on UA Flight

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Breastfeeding Mother Embarrassed on UA Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2015, 4:16 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium.;UA 1.5MM; UA Lifetime Gold (whoppee); DL Plat
Posts: 2,124
Originally Posted by Ulotka
Let's compromise. Cover it up. Your baby gets fed and I don't have to see your private parts. Have a nice day.
+1. The long and the short of it!
boss315 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 4:47 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,731
Originally Posted by Ulotka
Let's compromise. Cover it up. Your baby gets fed and I don't have to see your private parts. Have a nice day.
Don't want to see private parts? Stop staring and move your face a foot or more away from mom's chest. Then you won't see private parts.
CBear is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 4:52 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Amazing how this offends people. LOOK AWAY.....none of your business. Do you stop eating in public ?
HMPS is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 4:58 pm
  #19  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,790
I don't care if the private parts are exposed, it's completely natural, just don't get mad at me if I glance over.
airplanegod is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 5:25 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,784
Originally Posted by Ulotka
Let's compromise. Cover it up. Your baby gets fed and I don't have to see your private parts. Have a nice day.
Last I checked, "private parts" refer to genitalia. In reading through the story, there is no indication that she flaunted her vagina.

There is nothing remotely sexual or vulgar about breastfeeding. Anyone who is offended by breastfeeding, or breast in general, would best be served by never leaving their house, watching TV, or browsing the interwebs.
brendog is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 5:45 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Lots of fear of breasts here.

Who knew!
mre5765 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 7:30 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: san francisco.
Programs: Marriott Ti, OW Ruby
Posts: 1,852
life is full of embarrassing and humiliating moments.

We mostly get on with life and move on.

Why shouldn't the person in question?
tattikat2 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 7:45 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,042
It is easy to be discrete but there are militants out there seeking a kerfluffle. It is not necessary to bare the whole breast to feed but this is usually what is happening when mothers get asked to cover up.
Tizzette is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 7:50 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by Tizzette
It is easy to be discrete but there are militants out there seeking a kerfluffle. It is not necessary to bare the whole breast to feed but this is usually what is happening when mothers get asked to cover up.
Correct. In India where modesty reigns supreme babies are fed in public situations. Most women wear saris , usually cotton and opaque. They just hold it over the feeding baby. nobody gives a second glance !
HMPS is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 8:05 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by brendog
Last I checked, "private parts" refer to genitalia. In reading through the story, there is no indication that she flaunted her vagina.

There is nothing remotely sexual or vulgar about breastfeeding. Anyone who is offended by breastfeeding, or breast in general, would best be served by never leaving their house, watching TV, or browsing the interwebs.
I guess there can be no compromise with the militant liberal.
Ulotka is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 9:04 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 273
If you are offended, that's your problem. It seems like the same sorts of incidents happen every single day, later the airline apologizes and says it is their policy to allow breastfeeding...however they don't seem to properly educate some employees on this policy
I am sick of hearing about it, why don't airlines just train their employees so they stop getting embarrassed over something so trivial
dlandz is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 9:53 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin TX
Programs: Mr Swise: AAdvantage LifetimePlt/3MM, HH Dmnd, SPG Plt
Posts: 1,451
Originally Posted by Ulotka
Let's compromise. Cover it up. Your baby gets fed and I don't have to see your private parts. Have a nice day.


That stops working once babies are about 4 months old and can grab the cover and yank it off or bat it away. Not to mention, covers are incredibly cumbersome and really don't cover anything that isn't already covered by the baby. Also, covers are hot and stuffy. Would you like to eat your dinner with a blanket inches from your face?

Some moms feel more comfortable with a cover. Some moms (and most babies, ime) don't.
swise is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 10:12 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
I'm generally supportive of labor. However, I'm afraid that we will not see a stop of this sort of horrid FA behavior until someone gets fired. Really, what is that guy's problem? And why do things like this keep hapenning?

She was breast feeding. Maybe a little peaked out. So what - its just a breast. Everyone has them. And besides what is possibly more natural than a woman feeding her child?

Too bad UA no longer has any intrastate flights in New York - where women are free to be top free altogether, child or not, (provided not for commercial purposes). I'd love to see UA have to pony up some $$ for violating the woman's rights.

Perhaps some women might wish to make for a test case on one of the airlines which do have intrastate New York service -- or in one of the other jurisdictions where it is illegal to discriminate against women's breasts.
Indelaware is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 10:26 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SNA
Posts: 18,240
I'm long past my breastfeeding years, but I try to give every mom I see breastfeeding a big smile. In the beginning it was a little difficult and awkward to get them situated and latched on, then when they get older they do sometimes fidget and pull at your clothes or covers. I don't think I ever flashed anyone, no one ever complained, but if I did it was unintentional. I probably flashed more belly trying to tuck the baby under a tshirt than I ever did boob.
VickiSoCal is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2015, 10:48 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: YYZ/YHM
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Air Canada 50K, United Silver, Accor Platinum, Others on Rotation
Posts: 363
Originally Posted by tattikat2
life is full of embarrassing and humiliating moments.

We mostly get on with life and move on.

Why shouldn't the person in question?
If this was an uneducated passenger I would agree. However, this was a United FA who is acting inappropriately and unacceptably.

Flight Attendants (at least claim) to play a crucial role as crew members with critical responsibilities in safety. Implicit in that role is a requirement for good judgement and smart decision making.

If an onboard crew member cannot treat a passenger with respect they need to be dismissed from their position or be required to undergo significant remedial training.

If the airline cannot or will not properly supervise its employees to eliminate this sort of response it raises significant questions about the airline's broader operations.
CanadianConnection33 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.