Voting Ended - Motion Failed: "Formalizing a Friendly Amendment process"
#76
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
I'm with the TalkBoard President. I cannot speak for him, but I get the feeling that there are certain members who delight in nitpicking everyone of our suggestions. And I also think nitpicking is the best word. The negativity, which often reaches a hysterical fever pitch, is at times overwhelming.
#77
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,623
Personally, I don't mind the nitpicking.
I like nits. And how else can I make a meal of them unless I pick them!?
mmmmmm.... freshly picked nits.
Anyway.
So it seems like there are 3 options here:
Go with the language nsx proposes.
Go with the language nsx proposes plus a definition of 'minor' such as the one I provide above.
Go with the status quo which some seem to think means any changes will require a motion to be voted down and re-drafted for even the smallest change, but in practice actually means that minor changes are made at on an ad hoc basis in the private TB forum using whatever process the current TB chooses to apply (IME).
I can live with any of the three. But I would prefer to formalize this process.
I like nits. And how else can I make a meal of them unless I pick them!?
mmmmmm.... freshly picked nits.
Anyway.
So it seems like there are 3 options here:
Go with the language nsx proposes.
Go with the language nsx proposes plus a definition of 'minor' such as the one I provide above.
Go with the status quo which some seem to think means any changes will require a motion to be voted down and re-drafted for even the smallest change, but in practice actually means that minor changes are made at on an ad hoc basis in the private TB forum using whatever process the current TB chooses to apply (IME).
I can live with any of the three. But I would prefer to formalize this process.
#78
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
I'm glad you're participating in the public thread. Would love to get the three members sitting on the sidelines participating here, too, but I know that's not required. I hate seeing Talk Board forum threads monopolized by a few Talk Board members while others sit on the sidelines.
I'm quite content with the idea of a "friendly amendment" process, and I take a fairly wide view of what's "immaterial" and that doesn't need to go through the entire proposal process multiple times. I am apt to vote "for" any such proposal.
#79
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
I'm with the TalkBoard President. I cannot speak for him, but I get the feeling that there are certain members who delight in nitpicking everyone of our suggestions. And I also think nitpicking is the best word. The negativity, which often reaches a hysterical fever pitch, is at times overwhelming.
#80
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,059
I'm with the TalkBoard President. I cannot speak for him, but I get the feeling that there are certain members who delight in nitpicking everyone of our suggestions. And I also think nitpicking is the best word. The negativity, which often reaches a hysterical fever pitch, is at times overwhelming.
#81
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,059
Sweating the details, especially before motions are actually proposed and seconded, can minimize the amount of "friendly amendments" that occur and can improve the end result.
#82
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
You're putting words in people's mouths. I don't believe anyone equated the two. As I see it, there are people making suggestions and there are people nitpicking. The suggestions and opinions are pretty darn helpful. The nitpicking doesn't seem to add value, to me. I think there is a lot of grinding of teeth over the "exception" rather than the "rule" here. I do not believe anyone on TB is trying to overtake the world or rush to make adverse changes to FT. The aim is to take the membership's viewpoint into consideration while making things better than we found it in a fairly efficient manner.
Last edited by dchristiva; Mar 2, 2015 at 11:24 am
#83
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
And why is this such a concern? Pencils have erasers for a reason. Mistakes can be corrected. Why not strike a balance between efficiency and striving for perfection. Mulling over a proposal for all eternity doesn't guarantee that it will be "right" or won't need a revision or amendment somewhere down the road.
#84
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,059
And why is this such a concern? Pencils have erasers for a reason. Mistakes can be corrected. Why not strike a balance between efficiency and striving for perfection. Mulling over a proposal for all eternity doesn't guarantee that it will be "right" or won't need a revision or amendment somewhere down the road.
#85
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
You're putting words in people's mouths. I don't believe anyone equated the two. As I see it, there are people making suggestions and there are people nitpicking. The suggestions and opinions are pretty darn helpful. The nitpicking doesn't seem to add value, to me. I think there is a lot of grinding of teeth over the "exception" rather than the "rule" here. I do not believe anyone on TB is trying to overtake the world or rush to make adverse changes to FT. The aim is to take the membership's viewpoint into consideration while make things better than we found it in a fairly efficient manner.
And why is this such a concern? Pencils have erasers for a reason. Mistakes can be corrected. Why not strike a balance between efficiency and striving for perfection. Mulling over a proposal for all eternity doesn't guarantee that it will be "right" or won't need a revision or amendment somewhere down the road.
As one wise man already said, "This isn't the United Nations, folks."
Bruce
#87
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
I'm with the TalkBoard President. I cannot speak for him, but I get the feeling that there are certain members who delight in nitpicking everyone of our suggestions. And I also think nitpicking is the best word. The negativity, which often reaches a hysterical fever pitch, is at times overwhelming.
Bolding mine: More so this than public comment as if due diligence is done, then the number of poorly worded motions get reduced
#88
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
I strongly believe that phrases like "poorly worded motions" are themselves misleading. Every motion that I have seen during my 15 or so months on TalkBoard has been very carefully crafted, after intense public and private discussion. Nevertheless, a few have been less than perfect, with subtle flaws becoming apparent after the motion was made and announced, and more people started reading it. I suppose that the proposer might have discovered the flaws if he or she had studied it intensely enough for a long enough time. Maybe so; maybe not. But we cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good. (Thank you, Voltaire!) We move ahead when we believe that we are ready. If we find subtle flaws, then we (or the people higher up the food chain) can, should and really must fix them. That can happen many different ways. One such way is a practical friendly amendment process, which I totally support.
Bruce
Bruce
#89
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,114
Cheers.
#90
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
I agree, although I'll note that the definitions of "friendly" amendments, "minor" and whatnot are pretty well understood just from ordinary usage (or a dictionary, if necessary). The more things we choose to define, the more additional things we need to define. It quickly spirals out of control.
Bruce
Bruce