Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Voting Ended - Motion Failed: "Formalizing a Friendly Amendment process"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Voting Ended - Motion Failed: "Formalizing a Friendly Amendment process"

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2015, 7:40 am
  #121  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,040
Still not sufficient.

Now, on another front. Since the Talkboard has chosen to put in a "waiting period" to vote on motions... does the clock start again when you change the motion you are voting on? And do you notify the community again?

I am beginning to feel like House Republicans are in charge here....

Originally Posted by kokonutz
Because a YES voter can object to the change and if he or she does then the change will not be made.
wharvey is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 7:54 am
  #122  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
No, the clock does not restart, and no new announcement is made. That's because, by definition, friendly amendments are minor and consistent with the original intent.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 9:24 am
  #123  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
However, the revised motion should certainly be posted, including information regarding the identity of the TB member who proposed the friendly amendment.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 9:35 am
  #124  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Certainly any agreed-upon changes to the motion would be noted immediately.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2015, 1:28 pm
  #125  
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 24,997
Originally Posted by tom911
I'm glad you're participating in the public thread. Would love to get the three members sitting on the sidelines participating here, too, but I know that's not required. I hate seeing Talk Board forum threads monopolized by a few Talk Board members while others sit on the sidelines.
I usually do not comment on FlyerTalk unless I have something to say — or, at least, offer some levity.

It is also difficult to comment while I am traveling. I am currently in South Africa.

We are volunteers who are human and serve TalkBoard primarily to recommend improvements to FlyerTalk based on the input and suggestions of fellow FlyerTalk members. I have nothing up my sleeve; nor do I have any nefarious plans to usurp power and conquer the world. I never did that in my greater than ten years as a moderator; and I do not intend to do that as a member of TalkBoard.

Here is how I see it: the Friendly Amendment process is to avoid having to scrap a motion just because of a minor or typographical error and be required to go through the entire process again as a result. Changing the intended purpose of a motion is not a minor change. Typing five forums when only four forums are affected in a motion is minor — especially when the specific forums are listed in the motion for all to see.

In other words — from my point of view, anyway — this is another way to try to help improve the process for recommending improvements for FlyerTalk; but suggestions and thoughts are always welcome by me...

...but I also like to keep things easy. There is no reason for anything to be difficult. If you want something, suggest it by posting it; and I promise to give it the consideration it deserves before I vote — friendly amendment or not.
Canarsie is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 10:49 am
  #126  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Here's the latest draft. One change allows any TB member, even a No voter, to propose a friendly amendment. The other change disallows proposing friendly amendments too close to the end of the voting period, so as to limit the potential stress of getting responses from TB members who may have limited availability or connectivity.


Add item 4.B.v.
v. Any TalkBoard member may propose a friendly amendment to a motion more than 48 hours from the vote closing time and before enough yes or no votes have been achieved to either pass or not-pass the motion. If the originator of a motion, the seconder, and all Yes voters as of the time the friendly amendment was proposed agree that the amendment is both minor and desirable, the TalkBoard President shall revise the motion and ensure that public notices of the motion are also updated.

Modify item 4.C.v.
v. Once a TalkBoard member registers a selection that selection is final, except that a member voting No or Abstain may change that vote within 48 hours after a motion has been modified by friendly amendment. The TalkBoard President shall manually adjust the original vote count as necessary. If the possibility of changed votes exists due to a proposed friendly amendment, the TalkBoard President shall decide whether to defer public announcement of a "shall not pass" outcome until the end of the 48-hour period after the motion is modified.

Add item 4.D.v. and move current item 4.D.v. to become 4.D.vi.
v. When a friendly amendment is approved, the TalkBoard President shall instruct the TalkBoard Vice President/Secretary to post the text of the change and a list of the approving TalkBoard members in the public TalkBoard Topics thread announcing the vote.

vi. Once voting is completed and the TalkBoard President has formally announced the results of the vote in the TalkBoard forum the Vice President/Secretary shall announce the full results of the roll call vote in
a. the public TalkBoard Topics thread announcing the vote
b. a new thread in the Town Hall forum.
nsx is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 11:08 am
  #127  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
If a No voter proposes an amendment, I'm not sure it's "friendly." Isn't it simply an amendment?

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 11:25 am
  #128  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by bdschobel
If a No voter proposes an amendment, I'm not sure it's "friendly." Isn't it simply an amendment?
If it wins the approval of the Yes voters, then it is friendly. Otherwise it's moot.

Last edited by nsx; Mar 15, 2015 at 9:17 pm
nsx is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 5:37 pm
  #129  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
I would prefer to leave the word "friendly" out of the motion if we're going to allow "No" voters and abstainers to propose them. Substantively, there's no effect of leaving out that word. But the definition of "friendly amendment" is not then being twisted beyond recognition.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 5:50 pm
  #130  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by bdschobel
I would prefer to leave the word "friendly" out of the motion if we're going to allow "No" voters and abstainers to propose them. Substantively, there's no effect of leaving out that word. But the definition of "friendly amendment" is not then being twisted beyond recognition.
OK:

Add item 4.B.v.
v. Any TalkBoard member may propose an amendment to a motion more than 48 hours from the vote closing time and before enough yes or no votes have been achieved to either pass or not-pass the motion. If the originator of a motion, the seconder, and all Yes voters as of the time the amendment was proposed agree that the amendment is both minor and desirable, the TalkBoard President shall revise the motion and ensure that public notices of the motion are also updated.

Modify item 4.C.v.
v. Once a TalkBoard member registers a selection that selection is final, except that a member voting No or Abstain may change that vote within 48 hours after a motion has been modified by amendment. The TalkBoard President shall manually adjust the original vote count as necessary. If the possibility of changed votes exists due to a proposed amendment, the TalkBoard President shall decide whether to defer public announcement of a "shall not pass" outcome until the end of the 48-hour period after the motion is modified.

Add item 4.D.v. and move current item 4.D.v. to become 4.D.vi.
v. When an amendment is approved, the TalkBoard President shall instruct the TalkBoard Vice President/Secretary to post the text of the change and a list of the approving TalkBoard members in the public TalkBoard Topics thread announcing the vote.

vi. Once voting is completed and the TalkBoard President has formally announced the results of the vote in the TalkBoard forum the Vice President/Secretary shall announce the full results of the roll call vote in
a. the public TalkBoard Topics thread announcing the vote
b. a new thread in the Town Hall forum.
nsx is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 5:53 pm
  #131  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Looks good to me. Want a second?

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2015, 9:17 pm
  #132  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Original Poster
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by bdschobel
Looks good to me. Want a second?
I'll give it a day or two for people to find any holes in it. I would embarrassed to need a friendly amendment to this particular proposal!
nsx is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2015, 9:10 am
  #133  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498


Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2015, 9:30 am
  #134  
mia
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,958
Originally Posted by nsx
...If the originator of a motion, the seconder, and all Yes voters as of the time the amendment was proposed agree that the amendment is both minor and desirable, the TalkBoard President shall revise the motion and ensure that public notices of the motion are also updated.
I don't fully understand why the clause highlighted in red is necessary. It seems to open a basis for arguing over whether or not a change is "minor".
mia is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2015, 9:35 am
  #135  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,113
Originally Posted by mia
I don't fully understand why the clause highlighted in red is necessary. It seems to open a basis for arguing over whether or not a change is "minor".
Agree, which is why I posted up thread that I'd like to see koko's verbiage incorporated into this.

'A minor variation in an aspect or aspects of the details of a motion which does not alter the overall intent of the motion nor raise any new issues for consideration which would otherwise warrant the submission of a new motion'.


Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.