St. Regis London (Lanesborough) for 35GBP a night!
#77
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
Here is what the BBC has to say about internet pricing errors:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
#78
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
Originally Posted by GUWonder
If the Lanesborough's bottom line is impacted more than by 1% by honoring the reservations, then I would be surprised.
#79
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
Originally Posted by RJB
Here is what the BBC has to say about internet pricing errors:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
How could Starwood possibly prove that the consumer knew that a rate was an error?
I flew for free on 9/11/02 on Spirit. JetsGo offered "free" flights. I've stumbled upon low fares on Travelocity. Is it legally my burden to confirm a confirmation? That doesn't make sense.
#80
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by RJB
Here is what the BBC has to say about internet pricing errors:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2872429.stm
The relevant paragraph is probably this, since UK law is based on case law (ie previous decisions on similar issues are used as the basis for future claims): "case law makes it clear that if a buyer understands that a price is a mistake and tries to take advantage of it then they have no right to insist on the offered price being upheld."
$63 (pre-tax) for a hotel night is no joke either.
Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 13, 2005 at 8:12 am
#81
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by anonplz
Ah, but I'm not so sure the bottom line alone would account entirely for St. Regis' reneging on the contract, if you know what I mean.
.... and in another twist, I'm sure that the holier-than-thou crowd is not generally wholly holy, especially if they back-pedal after committing.
#82
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by anonplz
(And I've made this point before, but...)
How could Starwood possibly prove that the consumer knew that a rate was an error?
I flew for free on 9/11/02 on Spirit. JetsGo offered "free" flights. I've stumbled upon low fares on Travelocity. Is it legally my burden to confirm a confirmation? That doesn't make sense.
How could Starwood possibly prove that the consumer knew that a rate was an error?
I flew for free on 9/11/02 on Spirit. JetsGo offered "free" flights. I've stumbled upon low fares on Travelocity. Is it legally my burden to confirm a confirmation? That doesn't make sense.
#83
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
Originally Posted by GUWonder
... especially when another hotel along Hyde Park (LeMeridien) has gone for a comparable price too (on Priceline) within the past 3 years.
But I really do hope this comes off. It is an astounding hotel, outside traffic aside.
#84
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: Sir CT-UK - Streaker pour les autres.
Posts: 5,901
I am in on July 4th also 3 nights with the wife for her 30th Birthday!
She is over the moon with the idea (and doesn't know how much it cost )
She is over the moon with the idea (and doesn't know how much it cost )
#85
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL DM, AA PlatPro, Hilton DM, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 1,532
I shouldn't have gone to sleep last night... anyone still finding availability? I can't find the 'Summer Rates' on SPG.com but it's still on Orbitz. I was able to find one date (Aug 4-7) where the rate came up but after pressing on it Orbitz said it was unavailable.
#86
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
Originally Posted by GUWonder
... especially when another hotel along Hyde Park (LeMeridien) has gone for a comparable price too (on Priceline) within the past 3 years.
As far as I'm concerned, a confirmation is an e-mail or letter from the travel agent saying, "it's all checked out, you're good to go, start making any other arrangements you have to - have a good trip." End of story.
#87
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: london, uk
Programs: some blue some silver some gold
Posts: 550
"As far as I'm concerned, a confirmation is an e-mail or letter from the travel agent saying, "it's all checked out, you're good to go, start making any other arrangements you have to - have a good trip." End of story."
exactly, they sent a confirmation email after the booking...if they didn't check it out first then they shouldn't have sent the confirmation out. and if they decide to send confirmations out automatically, then on their own head be it
i'm booked at the washington st regis in september at a $189 rate (still available). the rack rate is $550. am i supposed to think that this is a mistake?! and then does that give them the right to cancel it at the last minute if they think it they can argue it should have been $1890?!?! i don't think so.
just my tuppence worth
exactly, they sent a confirmation email after the booking...if they didn't check it out first then they shouldn't have sent the confirmation out. and if they decide to send confirmations out automatically, then on their own head be it
i'm booked at the washington st regis in september at a $189 rate (still available). the rack rate is $550. am i supposed to think that this is a mistake?! and then does that give them the right to cancel it at the last minute if they think it they can argue it should have been $1890?!?! i don't think so.
just my tuppence worth
Last edited by dhoward; Apr 13, 2005 at 8:56 am
#88
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Programs: Bonvoy Gold, AA Plat, Volare Premier, VS Silver, National Emerald Elite, Hertz President Circle
Posts: 2,526
"... We are pleased to confirm your reservation with us."
#89
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: AA Plat, SPG Gold
Posts: 204
Does anyone see an issue if only one person is in the room, instead of two?
#90
Join Date: May 2004
Location: VA
Programs: Marriott Silver, Hilton Silver, Hertz #1 Gold, Avis Preferred
Posts: 709
Apparently it should have been 355, not 35, as that is what is now showing up...