Advice Needed, Hotel Breach of Contract - W New York - Union Square
#196
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 233
If OP asked for assistance from Starwood with the original reservation and explained to Starwood how he planned to use the room, then Starwood should have communicated this accurately to the hotel when they were helping with the reservation. Perhaps they suggested the room based on its website description, but they should have made sure that appropriate employees at the hotel were made aware of the plan. IMO it isn't unreasonable for the OP to assume that this had been done at the beginning, although folks with more experience in booking events at hotels would probably have verified the understanding at a much earlier point in time.
That's all I'm saying.
#197
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
It's a bit unclear how the suite floor plan would have worked with the party and specifically whether the OP had planned to have people spending time in the suite bedroom, versus using it for coats or not using it at all. If the OP didn't want guests in the bedroom (hopefully the suite has at least a second powder room), then the effective space is reduced, but it still doesn't seem unreasonable from a crowding viewpoint. However, there could be regulations about maximum occupancy of the rooms in addition to the maximum number that can legally sleep there. [As I said earlier in this thread, some SPG hotels have rules about the maximum number of people that may be in a room or suite at any time, thereby limiting visitors and parties.]
#198
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
#199
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
418 square feet holds 50 for a reception.
768 square feet holds 90 for a reception.
I'll admit that suites have more space-wasting furniture (and bathrooms, kitchens, etc.) than function rooms, but still . . .
#200
Join Date: Jun 2011
Programs: SPG Platinum, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 1,134
Originally Posted by OP
As an FYI, the hotel manager indicated that he felt that a reasonable number of people would be 10
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
IMO it isn't unreasonable for the OP to assume that this had been done at the beginning, although folks with more experience in booking events at hotels would probably have verified the understanding at a much earlier point in time.
It really does favor an FT member when we only hear their side of the story. There has been very little acknowledgement of that fact in this thread. If we had to score this out of 100, I would say the OP may have about 56% and the W would have the remaining 44%. Throw in the W's side of the story and that probably tilts things in their favor. One way or the other, both parties (no pun) are at fault.
#201
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: KSA
Programs: Marriott AMB, Skywards Gold
Posts: 3,738
This thread is still going?!
#202
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
#203
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
The W hotel's own website says that a 500 square foot function room holds 35 people for a reception. A 1,000 square foot suite is somewhat larger than a 500 square foot function room.
#204
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,324
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-us; LGL31L/V100 Build/KOT49I.L31L10d) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36)
So you think $5,000 F&B requirement for 10 people makes sense? In what universe?
The W hotel's own website says that a 500 square foot function room holds 35 people for a reception. A 1,000 square foot suite is somewhat larger than a 500 square foot function room.
It looks like sethb with post # 203 has won the Op's case against the property and the wonderful corporate customer service. Op please let them know they lost and and let us know what your compensation will be. Thank you sethb.
Originally Posted by sethb
The W hotel's own website says that a 500 square foot function room holds 35 people for a reception. A 1,000 square foot suite is somewhat larger than a 500 square foot function room.
#205
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Programs: Etihad Guest
Posts: 1,549
200 square feet is the bathrooms. Take it out.
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
A 1000 square foot function room has fire code approval for multiple occupancy, soundproofing, is located away from guest rooms, has appropriate entry and exit points and tends to have its own elevators or escalators.
A suite on a guest floor has none of those features.
The OP's plan was self-centred and inconsiderate towards other guests. I don't think he is in any way a bad person, simply that being a NYC resident he is probably desensitised to crowding and Neighbor noise in a way that most of us who live in places with higher levels of personal space and tranquillity are not.
The hotel was wrong to initially countenance such an event, although I suspect that they understood the OP to be planning a small dinner party at the table for 4-5.
And the hotel's advertising was grandiose and misleading.
But they are doing the right thing by their other guests in not allowing this inflated and inevitably disruptive party for 30+ to be hosted in a guest room.
Last edited by DCF; Mar 31, 2015 at 5:16 pm
#206
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, NYC, somewhere on planet Earth
Programs: UA 1K, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 8,289
Sorry, but that is nonsense.
200 square feet is the bathrooms. Take it out.
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
A 1000 square foot function room has fire code approval for multiple occupancy, soundproofing, is located away from guest rooms, has appropriate entry and exit points and tends to have its own elevators or escalators.
A suite on a guest floor has none of those features.
The OP's plan was self-centred and inconsiderate towards other guests. I don't think he is in any way a bad person, simply that being a NYC resident he is probably desensitised to crowding and Neighbor noise in a way that most of us who live in places with higher levels of personal space and tranquillity are not.
The hotel was wrong to initially countenance such an event, although I suspect that they understood the OP to be planning a small dinner party at the table for 4-5.
And the hotel's advertising was grandiose and misleading.
But they are doing the right thing by their other guests in not allowing this inflated and inevitably disruptive party for 30+ to be hosted in a guest room.
200 square feet is the bathrooms. Take it out.
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
A 1000 square foot function room has fire code approval for multiple occupancy, soundproofing, is located away from guest rooms, has appropriate entry and exit points and tends to have its own elevators or escalators.
A suite on a guest floor has none of those features.
The OP's plan was self-centred and inconsiderate towards other guests. I don't think he is in any way a bad person, simply that being a NYC resident he is probably desensitised to crowding and Neighbor noise in a way that most of us who live in places with higher levels of personal space and tranquillity are not.
The hotel was wrong to initially countenance such an event, although I suspect that they understood the OP to be planning a small dinner party at the table for 4-5.
And the hotel's advertising was grandiose and misleading.
But they are doing the right thing by their other guests in not allowing this inflated and inevitably disruptive party for 30+ to be hosted in a guest room.
First an agreement was made. Full stop. It was not until very recently that this agreement was cancelled!
Further, the hotel offered an F&B resolution. Well if it wasn't good before, why is throwing $5K at it better? Your point re: imposition on other guests is not resolved by what the hotel offered. Further, adjacent rooms could have been booked, limiting the noise pollution.
Finally, there is no reason to believe that the OP and his guests would have been disrespectful to other guests. Often when parties get too loud, simple security calls suffice in lowering the noise level.
While I resisted posting on this thread, the OP negotiated in good faith and was utterly let down by the hotel (one that I like very much) and SPG Corporate. Should he pursue this case, I think there is merit in his argument (and also that the hotel was willing to disavow its own restrictions if the OP threw some more (a lot) of $$ towards F&B.) This should have been caught months before, not weeks before an event. Sadly, this seems like the shifty Sheraton Pasadena thread where arbitrary, non-contractual decisions are made.
#207
Join Date: Jun 2011
Programs: SPG Platinum, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 1,134
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-us; LGL31L/V100 Build/KOT49I.L31L10d) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36)
It looks like sethb with post # 203 has won the Op's case against the property and the wonderful corporate customer service. Op please let them know they lost and and let us know what your compensation will be. Thank you sethb.
It looks like sethb with post # 203 has won the Op's case against the property and the wonderful corporate customer service. Op please let them know they lost and and let us know what your compensation will be. Thank you sethb.
#208
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
#209
Join Date: Oct 2000
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, Marriott Ambassador/Lifetime Titanium, Accor Silver, Club Carlson Gold, BW Diamond
Posts: 2,432
#210
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
OP has supposedly booked other birthday parties at the W Lexington and W Times Square, so that would make the OP a bit more experienced with event planning than the average blinker. I would assume the OP has likely learned a few lessons in his days as an amateur birthday self-planner: 1) How to properly book and hold an event at a hotel and 2) How to book an event a hotel for the cost of the rooms and 3) How to do something that likely makes the hotel want to back out of any verbal arrangement they may have started negotiating with him.
It really does favor an FT member when we only hear their side of the story.
It really does favor an FT member when we only hear their side of the story.
I also think that I've been good about telling both sides of the story (although I don't really understand the hotel's argument), I think I was really reasonable to not include the names of hotel employees on this thread, which could have potentially hindered future career opportunities for them.
Sorry, but that is nonsense.
200 square feet is the bathrooms. Take it out.
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
A 1000 square foot function room has fire code approval for multiple occupancy, soundproofing, is located away from guest rooms, has appropriate entry and exit points and tends to have its own elevators or escalators.
A suite on a guest floor has none of those features.
200 square feet is the bathrooms. Take it out.
400 square feet is the bedroom. Take it out.
At best, 400 square feet is the lounge area - but on the pictures it looks significantly less than that.
A 1000 square foot function room has fire code approval for multiple occupancy, soundproofing, is located away from guest rooms, has appropriate entry and exit points and tends to have its own elevators or escalators.
A suite on a guest floor has none of those features.
While I resisted posting on this thread, the OP negotiated in good faith and was utterly let down by the hotel (one that I like very much) and SPG Corporate. Should he pursue this case, I think there is merit in his argument (and also that the hotel was willing to disavow its own restrictions if the OP threw some more (a lot) of $$ towards F&B.) This should have been caught months before, not weeks before an event. Sadly, this seems like the shifty Sheraton Pasadena thread where arbitrary, non-contractual decisions are made.