FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Star Alliance (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/star-alliance-413/)
-   -   EVA * application is in (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/star-alliance/1187314-eva-application.html)

LAX Oct 23, 2011 11:51 pm


Originally Posted by Santander (Post 17324168)
Well whatever it is, they'd better hurry up. I want to earn AC (or whatever *A FFP I switch to by then) miles flying BR...

+1! I really want to try out BR to Asia as its fares are pretty competitive.

LAX

username Oct 23, 2011 11:51 pm


Originally Posted by Santander (Post 17324168)
Well whatever it is, they'd better hurry up. I want to earn AC (or whatever *A FFP I switch to by then) miles flying BR...

I also suspect that there will be a decent number of fare restrictions when it does happen.

PVDtoDEL Oct 24, 2011 12:34 am


Originally Posted by LAX (Post 17324997)
+1! I really want to try out BR to Asia as its fares are pretty competitive.

LAX

you get what you pay for ;)

bocastephen Oct 24, 2011 10:12 am

BR Premium Economy is barely tolerable...but definitely better than regular coach. There are some decent business class sales being run periodically - but as mentioned elsewhere, watch those fare classes.

If you don't want to fly CO or UA to Asia, I would strongly recommend AC as the backup choice, not BR.

Santander Oct 24, 2011 10:23 am


Originally Posted by bocastephen (Post 17326887)
If you don't want to fly CO or UA to Asia, I would strongly recommend AC as the backup choice, not BR.

I already fly BR occasionally intra-Asia in Elite so I know what to expect. Even I Y I think I would rather fly BR than UA.

LAX Oct 24, 2011 10:21 pm


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 17325095)
you get what you pay for ;)

How much worse than E- on UA can it be??:p

LAX

TPJ Oct 28, 2011 10:24 am


Originally Posted by Metropolitan Airlines (Post 15929037)
Provided most European destination by BR need a transit stop at Bangkok, I am interested whether TG and OS will not approve its addition or there will be a condition that BR will need to divert its LHR, AMS and VIE routes to Hong Kong

I don't think it will happen - I think PEK still does not allow Republic of China (i.e. Taiwan) carriers to overfly China en route to Europe - thus they have to fly via BKK or overfly Korea/Russia.

jexelot Nov 13, 2011 8:40 am

Why is that?

PVDtoDEL Nov 13, 2011 9:01 am

Because it is impossible to grant carriers the right to overfly if the country they are based in doesn't exist...

FWIW, PRC carriers can't fly over Taiwan either, but since Taiwan is tiny and out of the way, it doesn't really matter...

bocastephen Nov 13, 2011 12:26 pm


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 17441562)
Because it is impossible to grant carriers the right to overfly if the country they are based in doesn't exist......

Pardon?

Xyzzy Nov 13, 2011 12:58 pm


Originally Posted by bocastephen (Post 17442539)
Pardon?

The Peoples Republic of China (aka China) sees the Republic of China (aka Taiwan) as a r:eek:gue province and not a separate country. Information on the history of the dispute can be found here.

Santander Nov 13, 2011 1:26 pm


Originally Posted by jexelot (Post 17441469)
Why is that?

The same thing happens for North and South Korean airlines, they do not fly into each others' airspace because their governments do not recognise each others' legitimacy or sovereignty. This is of no importance to North Korean airlines (oops, airline) because they have no need to overfly the South, but for Southern airlines they always stay well clear of the border when taking off or landing at ICN.

Btw, neither China or Taiwan officially consider Taiwan to be a separate country. Both governments claim they are the legitimate government of the whole of China and Taiwan and do not recognise each other. So in this sense, Taiwan doesn't exist as a country de jure. Of course de facto it is.

bocastephen Nov 13, 2011 1:40 pm


Originally Posted by Xyzzy (Post 17442671)
The Peoples Republic of China (aka China) sees the Republic of China (aka Taiwan) as a r:eek:gue province and not a separate country. Information on the history of the dispute can be found here.

I know that :) I was disputing the notion that Taiwan is not a real country. Personally, I consider mainland China as the rogue and Taiwan as the standard-bearer for Chinese culture, but that's just me :)

Now on point, has anyone tried the new (and apparently not improved) EVA Premium Economy product? I have a friend who tried it recently and said it wasn't really that much better than coach and the seats were small and uncomfortable.

bmvaughn Nov 13, 2011 4:08 pm


Originally Posted by bocastephen (Post 17442539)
Pardon?

China doesn't acknowledge Taiwan as a separate country, therefore they can't grant flyover rights to them as such.

Which begs the question... if they consider Taiwan part of China, shouldn't EVA flights going over China be a domestic airline?

PVDtoDEL Nov 13, 2011 7:00 pm


Originally Posted by bmvaughn (Post 17443525)
Which begs the question... if they consider Taiwan part of China, shouldn't EVA flights going over China be a domestic airline?

Since the Taiwanese Carriers don't report to the Aviation Governing Body of the PRC, they are lucky that they aren't grounded ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:34 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.