Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

status of tiger etc safaris in india

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

status of tiger etc safaris in india

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 12:17 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
Exclamation status of tiger etc safaris in india

Originally Posted by aesla11
Just when I was ready to book our trip, someone pointed this out to me. India's supreme court ban on tiger safaris within national park. I personally think this was a great move to protect remaining tigers. So I guess we'll wait for their final permanent decision. Maybe it'll help out with over visited parks:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/world/...ism/index.html
Originally Posted by aesla11
It seems that permanent changes expected at indian safari parks will effect Aman i Khas as well as Taj/Andbeyond camps:

http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2...s-tiger-parks/
first, thanks ^

only 2/5 (taj/aman/oberoi) covered by WSJ >

Ranthambhore (aman/oberoi, rest taj)
whole park, spread across 275 square kilometers, is classified as a core
Bandhavgarh
the core area makes up 716 square kilometers of its 1,545 overall area. Until now, tourists were allowed access to 207 square kilometers of the core area
Pench - 411 km2 core 758 km2 total
http://www.thegef.org/gef/sites/theg...India_2012.pdf
(detailed study)

Kanha - 940 km2 core 1949 km2 total
http://www.corbettfoundation.org/tig...rves_kanha.php

Panna - has not delineated core ?


CNN >
Supreme Court of India imposed an interim ban on all tourism activities in core areas of tiger forests.

"(Until) final directions of the court, core areas in tiger reserves will not be used for tourism activities,"

expected to release its final ruling on August 22.

Last April the court ruled that all states must identify core zones and buffer zones of their tiger parks as part of a rolling effort to regulate where tourist attractions can be located

Tourist resorts and villages are to be located only in the buffer zones of parks. States are reluctant to identify buffer zones
but wait, there are NO accommodations IN the parks.. right?

also odd they have 2 tiger pictures dated the day after the ban was implemented..

linked in CNN >
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...-tiger-habitat

Irked by the lethargy of states in complying with the court's three-month-old order directing them to notify core and buffer zones of tiger reserves, national parks and sanctuaries, a bench of Justices Swatanter Kumar and F M I Kalifulla said if there was no action within three weeks, environment secretaries concerned could face contempt proceedings in addition to being saddled with a cost of Rs 50,000.

The interim ban is expected to goad the states in the right direction by shutting down the core areas

Times View
At a time when there is growing interest in sighting the big cat, the Supreme Court's decision to ban tourists from entering core tiger areas could actually turn out to be a setback for tiger conservation. Regulated presence of tourists actually acts as a sort of protection for animals and as a deterrent to poachers. Minus any legal human presence, poachers may get an unhindered run of the core areas. In fact, there may not even be a check on the work being put in by forest officials. Sharp-eyed tourists are known to have brought violations to the notice of officials and keep them on their toes. It would have been better to remove all human settlements from the core areas and give a free run to tigers, and a slightly restricted one to tourists.
http://www.amanresorts.com/amanikhas/rates.aspx
1 Oct, 2012
http://www.tajhotels.com/Luxury/Taj-.../Overview.html
Lodges are not operational from 1st July onwards till 15th October, as the national parks are closed due to monsoons.
so i doubt there will be any press releases from lodge operators any time soon

http://www.globaltigerpatrol.org/new...round-reserves
The year before, Madhya Pradesh had notified [hmm?] buffer zones in all its reserves, except Panna. People in Panna have been protesting the notification because they fear it will affect their livelihood. The state’s chief minister, Shivraj Singh Chauhan, too, had publicly announced in October, 2010, that Panna will not have a buffer zone. He said people were more important. After the court’s order, the protests in Panna have become vociferous
so while im confused how core can be closed if core has not been identified, in the context of this forum only panna (1/5) has not delineated core ?

http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news...ourism.html#cr
hearing on 22 August, at which Travel Operators For Tigers (TOFT) will present an argument to the Supreme Court for a review petition, allowing for the continuation of sustainable tourism in India's National Parks and reserves
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...ress-rs-murthy
Panna Tiger Reserve (PTR) on Friday. The park is spread over 543 sq km, where a big cat revival programme is underway after it lost all the tigers primarily to poaching some three years ago
Originally Posted by Ericka
I'm all for protecting the tigers, and perhaps a place like Ranthambhore allows too many tourists in. But this whole thing is crazy. Everyone knows the real threat to tigers is 1) poachers and 2) the occasional villager who gets mad if a tiger is preying on his livestock.

Keeping tourists out only allows more of 1 and 2 to go on. Hopefully, they'll just reduce the numbers allowed in.
Originally Posted by Musken
Totally agree with Ericka!

Keep us posted. As I wrote in another thread, we are also planning to visit India next near. We have been to Rathambore before (but did not see tigers), and would be happy to go to India also if there would be no tiger safari this time, I would of course like it more if we would be able to go there.
Originally Posted by aesla11
Although for us it seems quite a nuisance, this move by Indian Government seems plausible. Tigers numbers in India have gone down from 100,000 to less than 2000 in around a 100 years. So isolating these animals and only having certain routes open to visit the parks makes lots of sense as it would be easier to watch out for poachers.

Meanwhile, any other recommendations for luxury wildlife safari/observation tours in Asia that can be combined with Maldives would be highly appreciated.
Originally Posted by vuittonsofstyle
I think that Kanha is still OK as it is a huge reserve & Banjaar Tola is sited well outside of the reserve.
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/...ation-efforts/

http://ph.omg.yahoo.com/news/india-d...123958128.html

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-...e1-917581.aspx

http://india.nydailynews.com/newsart...to-tourism-ban

now we wait until aug 29

http://www.eturbonews.com/30903/indi...l-september-27

now we wait until sep 27

Originally Posted by aesla11
I have been keeping track of this situation. At this time, I would say it may be safer to go with Sri Lanka for near future. We've been researching Yala NP quite a bit and it sounds amazing. Chaaya Wild resort in particular stands out for luxury and total experience. India safari may have to wait but glad government is caring so much for Tigers.
i have no idea what its about (politics?)
but its not about ending tourism (would be done) and its not about tigers (privatization)
and even if it was, supreme court will get new appointments in next 1-2 yrs

besides india looks like nepal and bangladesh have tigers

Originally Posted by GUWonder
New judicial appointments won't make a difference in this regard, regardless of elections in that time frame.

Nepal and Bangladesh have some tiger populations -- the latter with more unique tigers in some ways -- but I would generally prefer Nepal to Bangladesh for off the beaten track tourism.
unless there is a minimum duration for all supreme court rulings, how is it that new judges cannot reverse?

Originally Posted by GUWonder
That's the wrong question if trying to understand the basis of what I stated earlier.

I am not about to explain all the actual machinations that go on with becoming a judge of the Supreme Court of India and how benches for hearings are reached, but any reasonably informed person intimately familiar with how things in this regard actually work (or not) would not jump to a conclusion that new appointments to that court in the next 1-2 years will make any difference with regard to environmental activism of this sort from the Supreme Court.
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
i have no idea what its about (politics?)
but its not about ending tourism (would be done) and its not about tigers (privatization)
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-...e1-936868.aspx

next is oct 3

http://www.ndtv.com/article/south/ke...tourism-275148

next is oct 9

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Oct 9, 2012 at 9:33 am
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 3:17 pm
  #2  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 18,234
OK, so what's the conclusion? Is there tourist access or not? I couldn't figure it out from your post!
RichardInSF is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 3:21 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 10,031
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
OK, so what's the conclusion? Is there tourist access or not? I couldn't figure it out from your post!
Had seen a report on Indian Sat. TV channel...in general no access for the time being....subject to change...
HMPS is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 3:34 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
OK, so what's the conclusion? Is there tourist access or not? I couldn't figure it out from your post!
In August there was definitely no access. Discussions continuing as to when this can change- balance of many tourist jobs and dollars versus risk of extinction of the animals. Hopefully there will be a happy balance.
TRAVELSIG is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 9:33 am
  #5  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
http://www.hospitalitybizindia.com/d...id=14850&sid=1

next is oct 16 (seems weekly since 3rd court date)

Originally Posted by TRAVELSIG
balance of many tourist jobs and dollars versus risk of extinction of the animals
but thats not the choice, as discussed above

http://dailypioneer.com/nation/98869...edibility.html
"Hand in tiger poaching dents forest personnel credibility"

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Oct 16, 2012 at 9:18 am
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 5:07 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/su...eserves-280449

The current Indian Supreme Court.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 9:17 am
  #7  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ia-tourism-ban

Belinda Wright, executive director of the Wildlife Protection Society of India, based in New Delhi, said a tourist ban would be a "total disaster".

Corbett Foundation, another wildlife protection charity in India, agrees.

Wright said Dubey was using unreliable figures. "Until the 2008 census, the tiger population was calculated using a discredited, unscientific method which allowed states to dramatically overestimate,"
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/c...w/16831380.cms

National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) has issued the first-ever guidelines for 'tiger conservation and tourism' proposing tourism in 20% core areas of tiger reserves and national parks.
http://projecttiger.nic.in/whtsnew/C...lines_NTCA.pdf
With this importance of tourism in tiger conservation in mind, it is recommended that a maximum of 20% of the core or critical tiger habitat usage (not exceeding the present usage) for regulated, low-impact tourist visitation may be permitted. In case the current usage exceeds 20% the Local Advisory Committee may decide on a timeframe for bringing down the usage to 20%.
BAN LIFTED

court said that states will have to adhere to guidelines issued by Centre...yesterday

ban was imposed after states failed to comply with the Centre's notification
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/i...w/16835975.cms
Court has asked every state to prepare tiger conservation plan within 6 months keeping in mind the NTCA guidelines and submit it to the Centre for approval

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Oct 16, 2012 at 9:39 am
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2012 | 10:27 am
  #8  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: UA1K, *G & Wife of UA1K MM
Posts: 3,525
Photo taken at Aman-i-Khas.
Ericka is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2025 | 6:41 am
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Sep 2025
Posts: 1
Post Kanha National Park

I had the chance to visit Kanha Tiger Reserve recently, and it was one of the most memorable wildlife experiences Ive had in India. The parks landscape is stunning vast meadows, thick sal forests, and that feeling of silence when the jungle slows down before a tiger sighting.

We were lucky to spot barasinghas (hard-ground swamp deer) in the meadows, and later on a tiger crossing near Kanha meadow. What stood out to me was how well-managed the safari system is the guides and naturalists know the park inside out, and they really help you understand the patterns of the animals.

For anyone planning, Id recommend booking safaris well in advance (permits sell out quickly). Early morning safaris are chilly but worth it for higher chances of big cat sightings. Luxury stays like Singinawa or Taj Banjaar Tola also make the whole trip more comfortable if youre combining safari with a relaxed holiday.


Kanha National Park
Kanha National Park



NSSharjeena is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2025 | 1:48 am
  #10  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 18,234
This is a 13 year old thread, and tourists have been allowed to view tigers in India for many years now. I know because I just did that a couple of years ago, as did the poster above.. So I am going to close this thread. If anyone has anything new about this topic, start a new thread.

Thanks,

RichardInSF, moderator, luxury hotels and travel
obscure2k likes this.
RichardInSF is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.