Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

Luxury Indian versus Sri Lankan Safari Experience

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Luxury Indian versus Sri Lankan Safari Experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 10:12 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Luxury Indian versus Sri Lankan Safari Experience

We are in planning stages for a combined Safari/Maldives trip next May/June. From my research, India and Sri Lanka have the best Safari options in Asia. India is pretty straight forward as Taj/Andbeyond camps are always fantastic. However, it will be quite hot in India and cultural excursions may not be as easy due to distances. On the other hand Sri Lanka's national parks such as Yala sound great (highest leopard concentration but no tigers) and weather should be more ideal. The only major issue with Sri Lanka would be Camp/resort quality that offers safaris. Of course, Amanwella seems too far from Yala (around 2 hours away). One of the ones that I've found would be Chayaa. Can anyone comment on quality of Safari experiences in two countries mentioned as well as possible luxury accomodation options in each?
aesla11 is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 10:44 am
  #2  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: UA1K, *G & Wife of UA1K MM
Posts: 3,525
I'm interested in the response to this as well. Based on my research of Sri Lanka (not been yet), my gut tells me it is not a safari destination. Yala strikes me as more of a one day diversion and not the multi day safari experience you would get from parts of India.

Have you ever seen tigers? I encourage people to see them now before they are gone. There are many luxury safari options in India.
Ericka is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 12:49 pm
  #3  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Here, there you know how it goes.
Posts: 1,518
How funny; was just coming here to ask about Amanwella and Amangalla, and see if anyone has any updates/thoughts about them.
aa213bb is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 4:19 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YYC
Programs: AC 50k 1MM, Marriott LT Titanium Elite
Posts: 3,456
Originally Posted by aesla11
We are in planning stages for a combined Safari/Maldives trip next May/June. From my research, India and Sri Lanka have the best Safari options in Asia. India is pretty straight forward as Taj/Andbeyond camps are always fantastic. However, it will be quite hot in India and cultural excursions may not be as easy due to distances. On the other hand Sri Lanka's national parks such as Yala sound great (highest leopard concentration but no tigers) and weather should be more ideal. The only major issue with Sri Lanka would be Camp/resort quality that offers safaris. Of course, Amanwella seems too far from Yala (around 2 hours away). One of the ones that I've found would be Chayaa. Can anyone comment on quality of Safari experiences in two countries mentioned as well as possible luxury accomodation options in each?
Depends where in India. Ranthambore is closed starting June 1st, and can be brutally hot in May. We considered ourselves lucky that it was low 40s during the day--last year it was apparently day time highs of 48. I have to say that I think even at Aman i Khas that would be debilitating. It is simply too hot to do anything between 10 am and 5 pm. I really do think May is too hot unless you are native. I dont think the north east would be much better; temperatures may be a couple degrees lower but humidity would be much higher. We will definitely go to India again, but it will just as definitely be Feb/March time. Also, and others may disagree with me, but if you are used to high end Africa safaris, India isnt that. I suspect that Sri Lanka is really really not that. Even Aman, Oberoi, etc are not quite up to high end South Africa, Tanzania, Botswanna standards.
ridefar is offline  
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 6:12 pm
  #5  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: UA1K, *G & Wife of UA1K MM
Posts: 3,525
Originally Posted by ridefar
Also, and others may disagree with me, but if you are used to high end Africa safaris, India isnt that. I suspect that Sri Lanka is really really not that. Even Aman, Oberoi, etc are not quite up to high end South Africa, Tanzania, Botswanna standards.
Sure, I'll disagree with you. We were delighted with our Aman-i-Khas safari experience after having been to Singita and some of the best that Botswana has to offer. It's different than Africa, but that doesn't necessarily mean worse.

As for weather.....can you move the trip up a bit?
Ericka is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 12:42 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Originally Posted by Ericka
Sure, I'll disagree with you. We were delighted with our Aman-i-Khas safari experience after having been to Singita and some of the best that Botswana has to offer. It's different than Africa, but that doesn't necessarily mean worse.

As for weather.....can you move the trip up a bit?
Unfortunately, we can not move the trip date as it depends on school holiday.
aesla11 is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 7:48 am
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: United global services, BA gold,
Posts: 846
We have done a number of safari trips in Africa, and one in India. We love Africa for this and I can say there are many suggestions of great places to go in your timeframe in both southern Africa and east Africa. India was a one off three day experience at Aman which we loved, but it was not in the same league as Africa IMHO. We were fortunate to see a tiger on Christmas Day no less, but one does not see the extensive game you see in some African lodges. If you were going to India to see other things it is definately a great add-on but weather would be miserable that time of year, and it sounds like it could be closed.

We are going to Sri Lanka in early January next year and I looked into the safari aspect and decided against it for several reasons: seemingly poor accomodations, crowded, not much chance to see much interesting game. Now I have not actually been and if we're to hear otherwise from a reliable source would reconsider! This is from talking to a former business colleague who lives there part of the year, and talking to friends who have been in the past. Amanwella is only a couple of hours away so it might be worth taking to them and asking. We will be staying there at the end of our trip so I thought depending on their feedback we might try to go to Yala for a day trip. Let me know what you find out!
Also would appreciate any additional comments people have on amangalla and amanwella - eg which rooms to request, etc. our expectations from previous comments are already not as high as other Amans, but we want to spend time in Sri Lanka and after cultural triangle and tea trails believe we will enjoy these two properties at the end!

Please share what you discover and decide! Thanks much.
Larkin is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012 | 3:14 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Thanks for all the replies. It makes alot more sense to stick with India. Tigers are actually alot more common to see in hot summer months as they come by water more often. For those with Aman i kas experience, from what I gather, it does not offer as good of safari quality as some of the andbeyond/taj properties such as Banjaar Tola. This may be due to lower numbers of animals in that particular national park? I think we'll deal with the heat and do India at Banjaar Tola. We have done Botswana and East Africa with Andbeyond the past two summers and have been very impressed so far.
aesla11 is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012 | 7:48 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Just when I was ready to book our trip, someone pointed this out to me. India's supreme court ban on tiger safaris within national park. I personally think this was a great move to protect remaining tigers. So I guess we'll wait for their final permanent decision. Maybe it'll help out with over visited parks:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/world/...ism/index.html
aesla11 is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 12:11 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
It seems that permanent changes expected at indian safari parks will effect Aman i Khas as well as Taj/Andbeyond camps:

http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2...s-tiger-parks/
aesla11 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 6:03 am
  #11  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: UA1K, *G & Wife of UA1K MM
Posts: 3,525
I'm all for protecting the tigers, and perhaps a place like Ranthambhore allows too many tourists in. But this whole thing is crazy. Everyone knows the real threat to tigers is 1) poachers and 2) the occasional villager who gets mad if a tiger is preying on his livestock.

Keeping tourists out only allows more of 1 and 2 to go on. Hopefully, they'll just reduce the numbers allowed in.
Ericka is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 7:42 am
  #12  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: OSL
Posts: 2,148
Totally agree with Ericka!

Keep us posted. As I wrote in another thread, we are also planning to visit India next near. We have been to Rathambore before (but did not see tigers), and would be happy to go to India also if there would be no tiger safari this time, I would of course like it more if we would be able to go there.
Musken is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 10:15 am
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Although for us it seems quite a nuisance, this move by Indian Government seems plausible. Tigers numbers in India have gone down from 100,000 to less than 2000 in around a 100 years. So isolating these animals and only having certain routes open to visit the parks makes lots of sense as it would be easier to watch out for poachers.

Meanwhile, any other recommendations for luxury wildlife safari/observation tours in Asia that can be combined with Maldives would be highly appreciated.
aesla11 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 10:32 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
I think that Kanha is still OK as it is a huge reserve & Banjaar Tola is sited well outside of the reserve.
vuittonsofstyle is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 9:41 pm
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
Programs: SPG, Amex Platinum
Posts: 223
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
I have been keeping track of this situation. At this time, I would say it may be safer to go with Sri Lanka for near future. We've been researching Yala NP quite a bit and it sounds amazing. Chaaya Wild resort in particular stands out for luxury and total experience. India safari may have to wait but glad government is caring so much for Tigers.
aesla11 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.