Old Profile for Involuntary Reroute (Archive Only)
#106



Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE, AY Gold, Accor Plat, various CC hotel status
Posts: 2,981
Just to keep some perspective, under EU regulations airlines are required to provide vouchers and accommodation in all circumstances, including weather delays or other "exceptional circumstances". And still LH, BA, Ryanair and the like are highly profitable with $140 oil (although in Ryanair's case they rarely if ever comply with the regulations).
#107
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: United 1K, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 139
I said that it's irresponsible and shameful for UA to screw over customers by imposing controllable overnight delays on them, and then not even trying to reimburse the customers for their full loss, when the loss the customer suffered results from a deliberate business decision by UA.
I don't know where you got the lawsuit or "trauma" crap. Yes, I happen to be a law student, but please keep your ad hominem attacks to yourself, thank you.
I don't know where you got the lawsuit or "trauma" crap. Yes, I happen to be a law student, but please keep your ad hominem attacks to yourself, thank you.
But doesn't "controllable" simply mean "not weather-related" -- usually a maintenance problem? In that case, isn't it a safety decision, not a business decision?
#108

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PDX
Programs: UA Nobody, HH Silver, PC Platinum
Posts: 996
I volunteered for a bump in Denver in May, and was told that I would have to arrange my own overnight accomodations if my seat was needed. I declined and took my name off the list.
YUCK!!
Kate
YUCK!!
Kate
#109

Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE (OMA or LNK)
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Starwood/Marriott, Hilton, IHG
Posts: 1,345
UA gave out $20 dinner vouchers in YVR last week for the cancellation of an SFO flight. It was weird; some CSR's gave out the dinner voucher (along with the hotel voucher - it was a crew related cancellation) and others didn't. The whole episode was handled very poorly by UA's ground staff in YVR. Everyone from the CSR's to the FA's were saying that UA is stretched to the breaking point and customers should be prepared for lousy service.
I think many elites, and non-elites, will soon be joining the folks over at WN and JetBlue if this continues. The ever lasting quest of the elites for an F upgraded seat just isn't going to be worth it if UA continues this downward trend.
I think many elites, and non-elites, will soon be joining the folks over at WN and JetBlue if this continues. The ever lasting quest of the elites for an F upgraded seat just isn't going to be worth it if UA continues this downward trend.
June 16th was my return. There was a minor schedule change e-mailed to me about six weeks out. No problem. I go to OLCI the night of the 15th but it tells me I have to call UA because of the schedule change. What a load of crap...print my bloody BP, you idiots.
So after being in the holding queue for approximately 42 minutes RA fixes the problem so I then have to go back down to the lobby to print the BP. Okay, fine.
I arrive at the airport about 1.5 hours early and sit at the gate. When the GAs arrive they announce an equipment downsize and that they need several volunteers. I ask them what they are offering. She tells me what the 'protection' is. I specifically ask about a meal voucher because the option I take is four hour wait then connection to YX in MKE because I have to be home that night for morning meeting. In hindsight, I should have taken the hotel room they were offering and took the first flight next day. She offers RT ticket and I ask about a travel voucher. She says $400 and I ask if it is good on INTL; she says any UA metal. Fine, give me the voucher, please.
So I give up my seat and after they close the flight another GA shows up and first lady gives my info to her to finish reboooking me and getting my vouchers. So I am given all of this stuff and it is explained to me. I am actually given four (4) $100 vouchers that must be redeemed at the airport. I'm on a bloody e-ticket. Why doesn't this stinking excuse for an airline do e-vouchers like most other carriers? NW puts them right in my WP account so I don't even have to have the paper receipt in my hand when I go to redeem them. I ask if they can be used together and am told yes. They are numbered 1-of-4, etc. so maybe I'm ok but as I later read the small print it says they cannot be combined. So I really don't know. Thought MAYBE I would use them to go to SIN Do but now I'm thinking CC.
But then comes the kicker. Where is my meal voucher? She tells me that UA only gives meal vouchers for 1Ks now. I tell her I specifically asked and was told I would get a meal voucher BEFORE giving up my seat. Her first response was tough; after I pressed she told me to get one from GA when I arrived MKE. I get to MKE and the guy said he would if he could but he couldn't even access the flight record, that he would need to do that to give me a voucher.
So I was either lied to or misled (what's the real difference I don't know) and remembered why I haven't flew UA in over seven years.
You people may like your dysfunctional excuse for an airline but I'm sticking with what works for me. I'd drive the 450 miles to Chicago before I'd take this stinking airline again.
Last edited by iluv2fly; Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 am Reason: sorry, no can do
#110


Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Programs: UA, AA, WN; HH, MR, IHG
Posts: 7,055
They may be combined with each other; they may not be combined with other vouchers. The small print should say that, I think... but even if not, you may combine VDB vouchers from the same booklet, but cannot combine multiple booklets.
#111
Formerly known as CollegeFlyer

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JRA
Programs: DL Plat, UA Million Miler / fmr. 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Gold.
Posts: 6,717
If a maintenance problem, it resulted from a business decision to spend $ instead of $$ in terms of planes, likely because UA mgmt decided that a certain Z% breakdown is profit-maximizing (or loss-minimizing). However, it is improper for UA to factor in dumping part of the cost (meals and hotel paid by the passengers themselves when UA cuts costs by canceling a flight) as part of the "savings" to UA.
#112

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Taiwan
Programs: UA, CX, BR
Posts: 719
Hey, what's a "flight of note"? (See post 1). Sorry if I missed an explanation in previous posts...
#114
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,687
just my humble opinion that if it got to that level, the current scotus (n.b. "current"*) would either refer the case back to the lower court or find a way to say that it infringed a hardship (or something similar) on the airlines-similar to what happened with the ny pax bor (but that was a state law overturned on the grounds that it was state trying to mandate something federal. do i want to see a pax bor, 100% yes but i don't think it will ever happen but on the oft chance that it does, it will be a disasster for pax as congress will find a way to screw it up (*and yes, i'm trying to avoid an omni-ish comment
)
)
#115
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: United 1K, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 139
But UA does cover the cost of the hotel for non-weather-related cancellations.
#116




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA GS MM, Marriott Life Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Southwest Alist pref, various others of little note
Posts: 2,873
#118
Formerly known as CollegeFlyer

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JRA
Programs: DL Plat, UA Million Miler / fmr. 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Gold.
Posts: 6,717
And even now, to get a hotel, generally (1) the pax must ask for it, (2) the agent must be familiar with the policy, or the passenger must argue with the agent, and (3) the agent must be willing to follow the rules instead of making up their own.
#119
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Out and about..
Posts: 1,102
Yes. For now. If the meal abolishment sticks, hotels are probably the next to go.
And even now, to get a hotel, generally (1) the pax must ask for it, (2) the agent must be familiar with the policy, or the passenger must argue with the agent, and (3) the agent must be willing to follow the rules instead of making up their own.
And even now, to get a hotel, generally (1) the pax must ask for it, (2) the agent must be familiar with the policy, or the passenger must argue with the agent, and (3) the agent must be willing to follow the rules instead of making up their own.
#120
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: United 1K, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 139
Yes. For now. If the meal abolishment sticks, hotels are probably the next to go.
And even now, to get a hotel, generally (1) the pax must ask for it, (2) the agent must be familiar with the policy, or the passenger must argue with the agent, and (3) the agent must be willing to follow the rules instead of making up their own.
And even now, to get a hotel, generally (1) the pax must ask for it, (2) the agent must be familiar with the policy, or the passenger must argue with the agent, and (3) the agent must be willing to follow the rules instead of making up their own.
First, the meal abolishment mentioned in the OP is only for non-overnight delays/cancellations. I wasn't aware that UA ever even had a policy for meal vouchers for non-overnight delays or cancellations. I certainly never saw them offered.
Second, you might have more experience with overnight cancellations than I do, but the one time it happened to me -- a few months ago -- I didn't have to ask for anything. The GA booked me on the next morning's flight and handed me a voucher covering the cost of the airport Hyatt along with some meal vouchers totaling around $15. It was handled very efficiently, and I assumed this was SOP for non-weather overnights.
Last edited by LLW; Jul 8, 2008 at 8:10 pm

