SAS Plus Europe [merged experience reports & FAQ]
#61
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,369
Whatever they think I don't think they're doing a good job at it considering the financial result each year. Frankly, the new concept sounds like the new Germanwings. I have also tried AB and didn't find it bad at all. These days it seems the other passengers are what make or break intra-European flights because the airline offerings are so slim. I really hate Swedish families travelling near me. I guess it's because I understand what they're saying and SAS have a lot of these people.
#62
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ZRH
Programs: A3 Gold, AY Silver
Posts: 458
I chose Y on SK metal over SK codeshare on LX metal recently for the 100% EB (and bonus challenge) points. As *G I could eat and drink in the lounge and survive the 1-2h hops with coffee and tea, but if I didn't have any status and wasn't a crazy FT miles collector I would definitely have gone for LX where possible, so you have a very valid point.
#63
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Koala Lemur
Programs: SK EBD LTG (*G)
Posts: 2,447
It really depends on your travel habits, patterns and needs.
Personally, I never really missed lack of service on board. I hate eating on a short flight. It is pretty much just asking for a chance to soil your cloth. I eat in the lounge, or before/after departure/arrival. I tend to fly early morning or late night. Often the best way to use the time is actually to get a nap. I appreciate that I am not bothered with temptation of food.
The value of the food you get is always negligible in comparison to the ticket price (whether you fly Y or C). So in my travel patterns price and the smoothness of the airport experience (schedule, fast track, priority boarding, seat pre-selection, etc) are the main decisive factors for me. Cabinn experience on short haul is almost a non-issue for me (except, as someone hinted, I do not like cabins filled with charter-like loud crowd).
Having said that, LX is often a good choice on these parameters for EBG, as the experience is comparable to SK (on the parameters I care about). I almost never choose them (maybe once a year) because their schedule on my destinations is usually less competitive.
Personally, I never really missed lack of service on board. I hate eating on a short flight. It is pretty much just asking for a chance to soil your cloth. I eat in the lounge, or before/after departure/arrival. I tend to fly early morning or late night. Often the best way to use the time is actually to get a nap. I appreciate that I am not bothered with temptation of food.
The value of the food you get is always negligible in comparison to the ticket price (whether you fly Y or C). So in my travel patterns price and the smoothness of the airport experience (schedule, fast track, priority boarding, seat pre-selection, etc) are the main decisive factors for me. Cabinn experience on short haul is almost a non-issue for me (except, as someone hinted, I do not like cabins filled with charter-like loud crowd).
Having said that, LX is often a good choice on these parameters for EBG, as the experience is comparable to SK (on the parameters I care about). I almost never choose them (maybe once a year) because their schedule on my destinations is usually less competitive.
#64
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CPH
Programs: SK Diamond (*G), HH Gold
Posts: 580
#65
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WRO, AQP
Programs: LatamPass Gold, SAS EBB, M&M
Posts: 674
Personally, I never really missed lack of service on board. I hate eating on a short flight. It is pretty much just asking for a chance to soil your cloth. I eat in the lounge, or before/after departure/arrival. I tend to fly early morning or late night. Often the best way to use the time is actually to get a nap. I appreciate that I am not bothered with temptation of food.
#66
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SUV
Programs: UA *G MM
Posts: 7,018
I guess the big carrot is the 200% miles for EB with Plus, but most of the time you are paying pretty much the same old business class fares, and I found that LX offers discounted business (when available) at the same price as a normal Go fare on SK for ARN-ZRH. Surely, EB gives at least 200% points for an LX business fare?
And when you are paying SEK 7000 one way, it's criminal to not at least block the middle seats. Pathetic. Especially with the horrible seat pitch on all shorthaul aircraft now that the MD-80s are gone.
#67
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 11,095
#68
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SUV
Programs: UA *G MM
Posts: 7,018
I am not an expert on LX booking classes but that seems like a comprehensive list. As you can see, premium LX tickets give additional earnings since, so that it matches what UA offers on LH.
For LH, UA only excludes very heavily discounted tickets for intra-Europe:
http://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/mark...spx?ItemId=298
#69
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 11,095
I think you are mistaken: http://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/mark...spx?ItemId=297
I am not an expert on LX booking classes but that seems like a comprehensive list. As you can see, premium LX tickets give additional earnings since, so that it matches what UA offers on LH.
For LH, UA only excludes very heavily discounted tickets for intra-Europe:
http://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/mark...spx?ItemId=298
I am not an expert on LX booking classes but that seems like a comprehensive list. As you can see, premium LX tickets give additional earnings since, so that it matches what UA offers on LH.
For LH, UA only excludes very heavily discounted tickets for intra-Europe:
http://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/mark...spx?ItemId=298
http://us.flyasiana.com/Global/US/en...?fid=CLUB15200
LX 'L' is a special fare ticket and I think it's fairly 'newish' (from 2010 or so).
#70
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SUV
Programs: UA *G MM
Posts: 7,018
My tickets for that leg was LX 'L' = according to the UA chart = 0, OZ= 70% of the miles.
http://us.flyasiana.com/Global/US/en...?fid=CLUB15200
LX 'L' is a special fare ticket and I think it's fairly 'newish' (from 2010 or so).
http://us.flyasiana.com/Global/US/en...?fid=CLUB15200
LX 'L' is a special fare ticket and I think it's fairly 'newish' (from 2010 or so).
Actually, SK has the cheapest flight on LX metal for twice the price also in booking class K on the same day. Not the same flight!
The typical Go Savers are SEK 2000 on SK's website vs. SEK 1500 on LX's.
#71
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Koala Lemur
Programs: SK EBD LTG (*G)
Posts: 2,447
I wouldn't be surprised if SAS decided to quote you once they decide to further "enhance" their service and offer even less value for money in comparison to their competitors. Most passengers (i) have no access to lounges and (ii) pay for their tickets out of their pockets. What could make them choose SAS over low cost carriers or reliable, full service airlines?
#72
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SUV
Programs: UA *G MM
Posts: 7,018
Here's a review in Danish with some people taking the last business class flights and returning in "Plus".
http://politiken.dk/turengaartil/rej...usiness-class/
My examples and data from ARN-ZRH show that SAS does not offer lower prices than a traditional airline even with codeshares.
http://politiken.dk/turengaartil/rej...usiness-class/
My examples and data from ARN-ZRH show that SAS does not offer lower prices than a traditional airline even with codeshares.
#74
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 11,095