Fetish wear?:rolleyes: How about stylish wear?

Just what type of layers are you wearing that would interfere with the WTMD?

I don't have anything like that now but I once had a boffo summer suit with a fitted jacket under which you certainly wouldn't wear anything. Think a coatdress that is two pieces.

Fortunately that does not seem to have occurred even to the TSA. Or are they now disassembling bras, like take out your laptop and turn it on?

Perhaps because "they're real, and they're magnificent?"

(It's killing me - name the scene!) It's hard to believe a US agency would sink this low. Time to upgrade TSA training, so these people understand? :(

Who would have guessed that this is today's consequence of the 'war on terror'.

Having gotten the "full paw" the last two times I travelled (which for now are the last), I have to add that that is as bad as showing.

I think this applies in this situation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRl1W...elated&search=

Just do what she does!

Teri Hatcher answers the question about her breasts....Seinfeld, Season 7, The Implants

:cool: I'd forgotten that one... (can't stand her!)

It's very common for suit jacket to be worn without much underneath, a thin silk camisole in the summer is about it. If it is acceptable for them to ask a woman to do this than why not men who wear an undershirt under their dress shirt? As baggy as some of them wear it would be at least as easy to conceal something under that as it would be for a very fitted suit jacket. The whole thing is such total BS anyway - inconsistant at best and totally ineffective.

I guarantee they don't ask you to take off the thin silk camisole. If they do, come back and tell peachfront, and I'll beat them across the head and shoulders with my real and magnificents! :cool:

Not peachfront, then? :eek: :)

I think the French woman decided to divest herself. If TSA ordered you to take off a garment and expose yourself they wouldn't be able to take any action.

I think the scenarios would be different. The French woman took her clothes off in a fit of anger during a secondary. She probably could have gotten away with it if she had feigned a little problem with the language and did this in response to a screener's orders.

In this scenario (academic at best because I'm not female), I would, first of all, have my legal ducks lined up and would be prepared to be arrested. Then, I would make it very clear, for the purposes of the checkpoint video, that I was simply following the screener's orders. This would mean you would have to get them to respond to clarification questions such as, "Do I understand that you require me to remove my outer garment?"

The scenario would have to go like this:

Screener: "Ma'am, you have to remove your outer garment."

You: "Are you requesting I remove my outer garment?"

Screener: "Yes, I'm requesting you remove your outer garment unless it is the only layer of clothing you are wearing."

You: "This is the outer layer of clothing. (Don't admit you aren't wearing anything underneath.) OK, I'll remove it."

Let the fun begin... I would also have an associate close at hand with a cell phone or other small device capable of recording the dialogue, because the checkpoint only records video. You'll need it when the TSA tries to make an example of you.

The reality is that the TSA can't ignore angry women, so I hope a brave woman goes through with this some day.

I wouldn't be surprised if the TSA then arrested her for lewd behaviour - mind you it help pay off the mortgage when you sue them

Got caught like that once, wearing practically nothing under my blazer, and was allowed through without taking it off. Then the next time I had forgotten to dress appropriately security had tightened up a lot and I more or less had to strip to my underwear - NOT a pretty sight, in my case - and now I feel it's just not worth the hassle and I try to remember to wear a tee-shirt underneath.