Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Liquid idoicy expanded (UK)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:28 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Liquid idoicy expanded (UK)

With effect from 1st May 2007, the UK Department for Transport will be introducing additional security checks on liquids carried in hand luggage through all UK and Channel Island Airports.

From that date, a sample of liquids carried in hand luggage will be subject to routine testing. This test involves sampling a liquid with a test strip, which then tracks for evidence of certain substances. The sample rate is relatively low and the test only takes a few seconds.
Fark
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:35 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy - Platinum
Posts: 14,289
Well ... ok ... if they can do that, then they could afford to lighten up on the stupid 100 ml restrictions along with it. Seems to me either they can check for explosives, or they can't?
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:50 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PHL-adjacent
Programs: AA Executive Platinum (but always US in my heart), HH Diamond
Posts: 3,358
OP: What is the source for that? Thanks!

I LOL'd @ "Fark." ^
honeytoes is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:14 am
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by honeytoes
OP: What is the source for that?
Posted on other boards (supposedly a "leaked" memo), but seemingly confirmed here .
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 1:39 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London and Zurich
Programs: AA, BA, Mucci: Sir Roger des Directions Routires, PCR
Posts: 13,609
Well, you can complain about the 'idoicy' but you'll just have to go along with it, or not bother.

Just like the 'idoicy' of two fingerprints being extended to all 10 digits at US Immigration shortly, and the photographing of the criminals, er, I mean visitors on entry. And have your bags never been swabbed?

Against all of that, a random liquid check of hand baggage is insignificant.
Roger is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 1:58 pm
  #6  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BDL
Programs: NWA Platinum, HHonors Diamond, SPG, YX, AA
Posts: 5,354
What's your tipping point where it's no longer insignificant for you?

I mean if a hand check of your bags isn't significant, than are you willing to accept a hand check of your bags every time you use the Tube or get on a bus? Is a full body scan on top of "two fingerprints being extended to all 10 digits at US Immigration shortly, and the photographing of the criminals, er, I mean visitors on entry." not that big of a deal since it's just one more thing?

We each have our point when it's just not worth it to travel anymore. The simple fact that visitors to the US is significantly down should be evidence of that!
MKEbound is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 2:03 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
Well ... ok ... if they can do that, then they could afford to lighten up on the stupid 100 ml restrictions along with it. Seems to me either they can check for explosives, or they can't?
I think you have it exactly right. I'm waiting for the follow-up memo that states that the liquid ban is coming to an end, since they have found a better method to, um, protect us.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 2:26 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by Roger
Well, you can complain about the 'idoicy'
Spellchecking doesn't include the title it seems
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 2:28 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy - Platinum
Posts: 14,289
Originally Posted by mikeef
I think you have it exactly right. I'm waiting for the follow-up memo that states that the liquid ban is coming to an end, since they have found a better method to, um, protect us.

Mike
I still don't believe that there's any significant "threat" to justify this stuff. However .. I'd be willing to hybridize security into: a) current lanes of 3-1-1 or b) voluntary SSSS for those who have stuff they refuse (for whatever reason) to check. You might have to wait longer, they swab your freakin' bottle of wine after checking the seal appears to be intact, and you don't have to check a bag just for that!

Not to mention all those dangerous snowglobes. I feel that one would have been the one to turn Kettles against this nonsense, if there's any one factor.
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 3:36 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
And what about liquids in sealed containers??

I travel with liquid medicine. It comes in individual dose ampules. Once the seal is broken there's no way to close them again--it's meant to be used at that point. Furthermore, the ampules are packed in groups in sealed packets.

Test them how???
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 3:52 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy - Platinum
Posts: 14,289
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
And what about liquids in sealed containers??

I travel with liquid medicine. It comes in individual dose ampules. Once the seal is broken there's no way to close them again--it's meant to be used at that point. Furthermore, the ampules are packed in groups in sealed packets.

Test them how???
I believe they would swab them (as best they could). Isn't medicine allowed now anyway?
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 6:44 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: CO Plat, Priority Club Plat, HH Diamond, Avis First, Hertz #1Gold
Posts: 720
I wonder if they will resuse the swabs like they do for the explosives detector?
vassilipan is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 6:53 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
With effect from 1st May 2007, the UK Department for Transport will be introducing additional security checks on liquids carried in hand luggage through all UK and Channel Island Airports.

From that date, a sample of liquids carried in hand luggage will be subject to routine testing. This test involves sampling a liquid with a test strip, which then tracks for evidence of certain substances. The sample rate is relatively low and the test only takes a few seconds.
Any penalties for bringing your own urine through security?
whirledtraveler is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 7:01 pm
  #14  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
Any penalties for bringing your own urine through security?
Better make sure you're not unwittingly testing positive for prohibited substances...
Spiff is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:28 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
I believe they would swab them (as best they could). Isn't medicine allowed now anyway?
I'm just questioning how they could possibly test stuff like what I have.

Or anything that must be kept sterile.
Loren Pechtel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.