Backscatter X-Ray at Phoenix is here
Mar 1, 2007, 6:01 pm
#91
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 355
Mar 1, 2007, 6:22 pm
#92
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVPG 75K, UA 2P
Posts: 1,453
Mar 1, 2007, 9:58 pm
#93
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 355
I would submit that the reasons for having the monitor in a separate room is more so that the searched passenger cannot see their own image and less for the privacy of said pax.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
Mar 1, 2007, 10:21 pm
#94
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,748
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PHXterminal4.jpg
And spinning in his grave...
Mar 2, 2007, 5:12 am
#95
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
I would submit that the reasons for having the monitor in a separate room is more so that the searched passenger cannot see their own image and less for the privacy of said pax.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
Mar 2, 2007, 5:26 am
#96
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)
...or that the TSA doesn't want their employees exposed to the radiation passengers are being exposed to. It would be interesting for someone to note the distance between the chamber and the TSA operator and if they see evidence of any type of shielding or special construction - wall thickness, seals on doors, etc
Originally Posted by seat17D
I would submit that the reasons for having the monitor in a separate room is more so that the searched passenger cannot see their own image and less for the privacy of said pax.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
After all, it's much easier to keep the sheeple in the dark if they can't see what's happening.
Mar 2, 2007, 7:09 am
#97
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I'm betting the tabloids will be paying for some celebrity images sooner or later.
Mar 4, 2007, 5:18 am
#98
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Mar 4, 2007, 11:43 am
#101
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,895
Mar 4, 2007, 1:27 pm
#103
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
How is this different than if a pax has been SSSS'd and as part of that secondary the weapon is found? There is no fruit of the poisonous tree if the implied consent holds up. If it doesn't then the whole basis for screening will fall away.
Mar 4, 2007, 4:13 pm
#104
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,178
