Backscatter X-Ray at Phoenix is here

Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:26 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
It is not mandatory, only comes into play when alarms are activated...
It is not mandatory because it is in the test phase. If it 'passes' the test, it will become mandatory. It has no chance of 'failing' the test. It will be mandatory.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:28 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Internets
Posts: 8,266
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
1) Actually, I was only showing the bipolar attitude moving in the opposite direction...and pointing out that your link was inaccurate.

2) I'm glad that you find time to work out daily, more Americans should do so. Sorry you took the post personal, but at least we all now know that you are proud of your chalk outline.

3) I do not see that it is intruive at all. It is not mandatory, only comes into play when alarms are activated, and shows a chalk outline.

4) I don't use Bowflex either, but it was easy to spell and served the purpose of discussion.

5) If you don't agree with a post, simply state that...thumping your chest, challenges, "double-dog dares", and personal attacks are usually ignored.
There was no more personal attack in my post than there was in your bowflex taunt.

Setting this little testosterone moment aside, let me make my point a different way.

1-Things are crawling in the wrong direction, a millimeter at a time, in increments of "it's temporary", 'it's only voluntary", "it's only for people who fail this other test","it's not intrusive".

2- This is a wild goose chase fueled by a perfect storm of fear, incompetence, stupidity and last but not least, corporate greed. I GARANTEE you that I can board an aircraft today with ten ceramic knives on me. Garanteed. I bet you a million dollars. Wanna know how I do it? It's not that hard. This country has spent countless billions of dollars since 9/11, AND I CAN STILL BOARD AN AIRCRAFT WITH 10 CERAMIC KNIVES ON ME.

So if you think for a second that this fancy kiddie porn disrobing device will prevent someone from doing what they want to do, I disagree.

Do you see that?
Droneklax is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:33 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
Only in America will people lift their shirts during Mardi Gras and Girls Gone Wild, go on Jerry Springer and talk about their lesbian dog's affair with their cousin, post disgusting or provocative pictures on MySpace and YouTube...and then complain about a chalk outline of their body being viewed...
I doubt those of us doing the complaining have done any of the things you cite. I haven't, my wife hasn't and neither of us will be subjecting ourselves to your latest enhanced security show (in all senses of the word) .
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:34 am
  #34  
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: UA 1MM, BA GGL, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond and others
Posts: 12,689
http://www.atnuke.com/nuclear/shielding/leadaprons.html
jason8612 is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:43 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
I'm a cancer survivor that has CT scans twice a year and has had literally dozens in the past 7 years I have been dealing with this and I now avoid the sun and all forms of radiation that I can. There's no way in hell I am going to allow anyone to expose me to X-radiation that doesn't have my oncologist's approval. This will be interesting, because I have already let my employer know that I will not enter one of these devices and if that means I don't fly that day, they are going to have to buy me bus tickets instead.

--PP
VideoPaul is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 9:52 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Internets
Posts: 8,266
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
I doubt those of us doing the complaining have done any of the things you cite.
Assuming even that you did, I see a slight difference between flashing from a New Orleans balcony out of your free will, and being coerced into it by a governmental entity.
Droneklax is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 10:06 am
  #37  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thailand
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium; IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 1,150
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
I believe your link goes to a description of the older model that was rejected. The newer models, as shown in the posts above, show only a chalk outline..not unlike that on "etch-a-sketch". But that seems to not be the real issue here. The fact that they are doing it at all will cause most here to discount any method offered, no matter how unintrusive the technology is. Only in America will people lift their shirts during Mardi Gras and Girls Gone Wild, go on Jerry Springer and talk about their lesbian dog's affair with their cousin, post disgusting or provocative pictures on MySpace and YouTube...and then complain about a chalk outline of their body discretely viewed by a same sex security agent after they have alarmed at the airport. Gotta love it. If a chalk outline of your one's body is a source of concern, try this: http://www.bowflex.com

Old images from another company not even the same equipment manafacturer.

The phoenix Backscatter machine is made by AS&E.
The images you reference are from the rapidscan machine (military application)

You people need to get your facts straight.
rebadc is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 10:09 am
  #38  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Thailand
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium; IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 1,150
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The Indian government has rejected this nonsense and have decided their one virtual stripsearch device has no place in the process of screening the flying public as a condition to fly from Indian airports. ^^
Again the Indian government was using the equipment from Rapidscan using un-filtered images.

TSA is using filtered images from another company.

Lets get the facts straight.
rebadc is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 10:58 am
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
This is a "chalk outline"? I don't think so.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/us/24scan.html?hp
doober is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:09 am
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,363
That NY Times article has an absurd quote:
Aviation security officials are rushing to bring new screening devices to airports because of the London-based plot last summer to use liquid explosives to blow up airliners headed to the United States.
Who are the sheeple who write and believe this stuff? What does this newfangled X-Ray machine have to do with the liquid-explosive nonsense? Nothing!
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:13 am
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by xyzzy
That NY Times article has an absurd quote:Who are the sheeple who write and believe this stuff? What does this newfangled X-Ray machine have to do with the liquid-explosive nonsense? Nothing!
You kinda left out the following two paragraphs that round out your quote:

The devices now used at the nation’s airports, the X-ray machine for carry-on bags and the metal detector for passengers, rely on 1950s-era technology that cannot reliably detect liquid or plastic explosives.

Earlier efforts by the federal security agency to introduce more advanced checkpoint technologies have stumbled, including the so-called puffer machines, which blow air on passengers to search for minute traces of explosives.
doober is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:20 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: W Northern Hemisphere as much as I can
Posts: 20
Talking Redundant!

Originally Posted by xyzzy
That NY Times article has an absurd quote...
elpinta is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:38 am
  #43  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by rebadc
Again the Indian government was using the equipment from Rapidscan using un-filtered images.

TSA is using filtered images from another company.

Lets get the facts straight.
My facts are straight.

Radiation is radiation of the same sort in this case and show more than airport security needs to see anywhere.

And if someone is stupid enough to ingest explosives or is willing to attach pouches of liquid nitro in select containers along their clothing lines does the "filter" on the backscatter X-ray even "help"? No. Even without the "filter", these peddled goods are a waste and will do little more than result in lots of embarassing false alarms.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am
  #44  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by xyzzy
That NY Times article has an absurd quote:Who are the sheeple who write and believe this stuff? What does this newfangled X-Ray machine have to do with the liquid-explosive nonsense? Nothing!
Only "security" idiots -- with money on the line -- would peddle this kind of nonsense against any purported "liquid-explosive" scenario, real or imagined.

I've seen demonstrations where these x-ray devices can be readily fooled by water carried on person in pouches aligned with clothing lines that I see no reason why these devices would do any good against such a purported scenario either, especially as such a porter's just asking for a Darwin Award.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by Cholula
Evidently not until the Kool-Aid drinking travelers like this lady wise-up:



Here’s a link to today’s full story.
I saw that quote. Unbelievable. Trust the TSA? HAHAHAHAHA
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.