TSA Distasteful Dual Standard For Shoe Inspections
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bryn Mawr PA & Wailea HI
Posts: 15,726
TSA Distasteful Dual Standard For Shoe Inspections
I think walking on filthy hard marble floors is not only totally unsanitary; it is also difficult for many people to do (including me). At LAX Term D you get the usual “We recommend you remove your shoes…..”. Most sheepeople grudgingly de-shoe but many refuse. So these shod people are immediately put in the “holding pen” for DE-SHOEING and WANDING.
As I was l in the “holding pan” and later being wanded and ordered to do the search routine, I noted 4 TSA people each wearing tennis-type shoes walk through the line WITHOUT being told to remove their shoes.
It appears a dual standard does indeed exist. And why the wanding and crap if no metal was detected by the metal detectors, ADM Loy?
Oh yeah, the TSA Martinette "proudly" in charge sneered "All soles or heels over 1 1/4" must come off".
MisterNice
As I was l in the “holding pan” and later being wanded and ordered to do the search routine, I noted 4 TSA people each wearing tennis-type shoes walk through the line WITHOUT being told to remove their shoes.
It appears a dual standard does indeed exist. And why the wanding and crap if no metal was detected by the metal detectors, ADM Loy?
Oh yeah, the TSA Martinette "proudly" in charge sneered "All soles or heels over 1 1/4" must come off".
MisterNice
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,510
I think we assume that a TSA employee would never use their access to a secure area to sneak a prohibited item or weapon past the checkpoint and give it to an accomplice on the other side....we just assume that would not happen.
In my opinion, if the pax and crew have to remove everything to cross the checkpoint, then the TSA staff should do exactly the same thing - every single time they cross from a non-secure partition to a secure area, and that includes shoes.
In my opinion, if the pax and crew have to remove everything to cross the checkpoint, then the TSA staff should do exactly the same thing - every single time they cross from a non-secure partition to a secure area, and that includes shoes.
#4
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 940
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">In my opinion, if the pax and crew have to remove everything to cross the checkpoint, then the TSA staff should do exactly the same thing - every single time they cross from a non-secure partition to a secure area, and that includes shoes. </font>
#5
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bellevue,Ne,USA
Posts: 164
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by bocastephen:
In my opinion, if the pax and crew have to remove everything to cross the checkpoint, then the TSA staff should do exactly the same thing - every single time they cross from a non-secure partition to a secure area, and that includes shoes.[/B]</font>
In my opinion, if the pax and crew have to remove everything to cross the checkpoint, then the TSA staff should do exactly the same thing - every single time they cross from a non-secure partition to a secure area, and that includes shoes.[/B]</font>
#6
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, N.C.
Posts: 732
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by screenerx:
Crew doesn't have the shoe rule applied to them either. They fit into the group of people that are excluded from that procedure.
</font>
Crew doesn't have the shoe rule applied to them either. They fit into the group of people that are excluded from that procedure.
</font>
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,510
well, in my opinion, the rules should be applied to everyone equally. At PBI and BWI I have seen flight crews remove their shoes for screening - crews should not have an exemption, nor should TSA staff.
The purpose of this oft controversial process is to screen for prohibited/threatening items, not decide who should be granted easy access to sterile airport areas by deciding some people are "safer" than others by virtue of their employment.
The purpose of this oft controversial process is to screen for prohibited/threatening items, not decide who should be granted easy access to sterile airport areas by deciding some people are "safer" than others by virtue of their employment.
#9
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 940
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">well, in my opinion, the rules should be applied to everyone equally. At PBI and BWI I have seen flight crews remove their shoes for screening - crews should not have an exemption, nor should TSA staff.
The purpose of this oft controversial process is to screen for prohibited/threatening items, not decide who should be granted easy access to sterile airport areas by deciding some people are "safer" than others by virtue of their employment.
</font>
The purpose of this oft controversial process is to screen for prohibited/threatening items, not decide who should be granted easy access to sterile airport areas by deciding some people are "safer" than others by virtue of their employment.
</font>
Screeners also sometimes remove their shoes because of shanks, but again we're exempt from the height rule.
At least this is what happens at my airport.
[This message has been edited by screenerx (edited Feb 17, 2004).]
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,564
I love the "height requirement."
My experience has been that the shoe fetish is much stronger in CA than anywhere else. This is the only state where I have been told to remove my shoes. Somehow, they are a threat in CA, but not in NY. I don't get it.
Most recent shoe removal order (order is the correct term, there was no suggestion involved), the SAN Commuter Terminal. Fortunately, the screener at LAX T4 had some common sense and did not require me to de-shoe.
My experience has been that the shoe fetish is much stronger in CA than anywhere else. This is the only state where I have been told to remove my shoes. Somehow, they are a threat in CA, but not in NY. I don't get it.
Most recent shoe removal order (order is the correct term, there was no suggestion involved), the SAN Commuter Terminal. Fortunately, the screener at LAX T4 had some common sense and did not require me to de-shoe.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,564
As a follow-up, let me say what is obvious to everyone with an ounce of common sense, but that never gets said:
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."
#12
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,960
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by PresRDC:
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."</font>
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."</font>
------------------
"Give me Liberty or give me Death." - Patrick Henry
#13
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Park City, UT USA
Posts: 12
The TSA shoe fetish is a load.
"Not @ MY Airport"...
This and some other posts on this topic prove a GIANT problem with the TSA. They are INCONSISTENT from airport to airport and even from between Security areas at any given airport.
Make a point whenever you are jerked around because of your tennis shoes to ask for the Supervisor and complain. Then engage him/her in uncomfortable conversation and questions regarding the Shoe policy and inconsistency. Be courteous but try to occupy their time for 15 minutes if you have the time. If everyone did this, it might help avoid shoe abuse.
"Not @ MY Airport"...
This and some other posts on this topic prove a GIANT problem with the TSA. They are INCONSISTENT from airport to airport and even from between Security areas at any given airport.
Make a point whenever you are jerked around because of your tennis shoes to ask for the Supervisor and complain. Then engage him/her in uncomfortable conversation and questions regarding the Shoe policy and inconsistency. Be courteous but try to occupy their time for 15 minutes if you have the time. If everyone did this, it might help avoid shoe abuse.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Park City, UT USA
Posts: 12
Another example of reactionary practices designed to falsely re-assure the general public...rather than spending resources averting danger on our flights.
The IRONIC thing:...either someone is hiding metal or they are hiding something non-metal.
If they are hiding Metal:
THEN THE DETECTOR WOULD GO OFF! (So no need to remove shoes)
If you are hiding NON-Metal (plastic explosives?):
THEN THE TERRORIST WOULD STICK IT IN HIS JOCK STRAP AND WALK THROUGH LIKE NORMAL! (So no point in removing shoes)
The IRONIC thing:...either someone is hiding metal or they are hiding something non-metal.
If they are hiding Metal:
THEN THE DETECTOR WOULD GO OFF! (So no need to remove shoes)
If you are hiding NON-Metal (plastic explosives?):
THEN THE TERRORIST WOULD STICK IT IN HIS JOCK STRAP AND WALK THROUGH LIKE NORMAL! (So no point in removing shoes)
#15
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GEG
Programs: Motel 6 Club Avoir Le Cafard
Posts: 5,027
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by PresRDC:
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."</font>
"THERE IS SPECIFIC INTELLEGENCE REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SHOE BOMBINGS AT CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS."</font>