![]() |
Originally Posted by tanja
(Post 16628967)
You mean a dirty diaper bag or a clean one?
I do know that both exist. But dirty diapers, we usually seal in the plastic bag.. TSA is welcome to search it..:) |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16628968)
Diaper is in the diaper bag..
in fact everything including diaper is in the diaper bag |
Originally Posted by GoingAway
(Post 16628978)
But not contents that soil said diaper ... They wanted the diaper or at least wouldn't clear without it being checked/removed is what it sounds like
Personally, I wouldn't have an issue if TSA doesn't want to clear it..:p :) |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16628984)
Again, we pack dirty diapers in a diaper bag..
Personally, I wouldn't have an issue if TSA doesn't want to clear it..:p :) Proceed. |
Originally Posted by Mabuk dan gila
(Post 16629058)
In that very specific case, I find "voluntarily surrendering" the suspicious items to the TSA at the checkpoint entirely appropriate.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
Proceed. |
SATTSO's silence is condemning.
|
Originally Posted by billycorgan
(Post 16630600)
SATTSO's silence is condemning.
|
Originally Posted by Mimi111
(Post 16630604)
Interesting, isn't it?
|
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
(Post 16630758)
Originally Posted by billycorgan SATTSO's silence is condemning. Originally Posted by Mimi111 Interesting, isn't it? |
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
(Post 16630758)
No, he's just put everyone on his Ignore list.
Much easier than engaging in conversation. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 16631942)
Much easier than engaging in conversation.
|
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2748834
Yet another report of how a "resolution patdown" actually turns out to be a strip search. |
Originally Posted by VegasCableGuy
(Post 16639383)
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2748834
Yet another report of how a "resolution patdown" actually turns out to be a strip search. |
Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
(Post 16628984)
Again, we pack dirty diapers in a diaper bag..
Personally, I wouldn't have an issue if TSA doesn't want to clear it..:p :) I always wondered if she thought a TSO had taken a dump in her bag when she got home. |
Originally Posted by VegasCableGuy
(Post 16639383)
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2748834
Yet another report of how a "resolution patdown" actually turns out to be a strip search. Why wasn't he pat down after the alarm in private? I mean, all of you believe TSO's love to touch people sexually, so who cares if his clothes are off... so many inaccuracies in this story that I could go on about. Howeve, as example of how even vets can lie, one former vet was caught lying to the Surgeon General (he was on his staff), said TSA made him take off his facial prosthesis. Our FSD received a call from a Secretary level member of the Bush staff, the man screaming how could this happen. The FSD ask for the info, found the the video, and saw that the vet had lied to the Surgeon General, who had contacted various Secretaries about why TSA would do this. The video was forward to the various depts, and the issue ended abruptly. I hope some of you do understand that people do lie to push an agenda. I know you believe that TSA lies. Its amazing that you believe every anit-TSA story out there. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.