Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How the TSA will inspect your monkey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 1:50 pm
  #46  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by IslandBased
I feel safe knowing that I'm not the one who will probably get bitten by the monkey.
Even if the monkey goes bananas on the TSA because the TSA spanked or otherwise abused the monkey, the TSA will still monkey around at airports as long as the TSA remains less accountable than a monkey.

Amongst the things the TSA and monkeys share in common -- they both steal or damage property owned by others.

Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 27, 2010 at 3:55 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 3:08 am
  #47  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am going to try one more time as well. Are you really sure that nothing can be hidden in a leash and/or leash device, inclusive or exclusive of the part of the leash being held by the handler that doesn't alarm the metal detectors?

With regard to at least the use of metal detectors, I wouldn't be so sure that a non-alarming leash/leash device in hand is necessarily any less capable of concealing some types of WEIs than a non-alarming diaper left on the monkey's diaper-covered area.
As far as what can be hidden in the thin leash, there is nothing that can be hidden in the non-alarming leash than can't be hidden beneath one's clothing that doesn't alarm.

With regard to the monkey, the monkey's diaper only needs to be inspected if the monkey alarms the metal detector. If the monkey doesn't alarm, the monkey gets to keep its dignity (and the diaper will not be removed, nor the monkey inspected at all). There is no double standard between the monkey diaper and the leash. If it doesn't alarm, it isn't inspected.
Ari is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 3:30 am
  #48  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,334
Originally Posted by n4zhg
It's a good thing I'm spoken for -- I'd be forced to make you a marriage proposal after that post. ^
RadioBloke (married 24 years this June) would object and you don't want to mess with him. But if we're ever in the same airport, I'll buy you a drink.
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 7:07 am
  #49  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Ari
I'm going to try one more time. The leash can't really hide anything; there is no leash "device"-- just a leash.

Here is an example of what it looks like:

http://media.rei.com/media/h/1242072.jpg

There isn't really anything that can be hidden in the leash.
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am going to try one more time as well. Are you really sure that nothing can be hidden in a leash and/or leash device, inclusive or exclusive of the part of the leash being held by the handler that doesn't alarm the metal detectors?

With regard to at least the use of metal detectors, I wouldn't be so sure that a non-alarming leash/leash device in hand is necessarily any less capable of concealing some types of WEIs than a non-alarming diaper left on the monkey's diaper-covered area.
Originally Posted by Ari
As far as what can be hidden in the thin leash, there is nothing that can be hidden in the non-alarming leash than can't be hidden beneath one's clothing that doesn't alarm.
Now, "[a]re you really sure that nothing can be hidden in a leash and/or leash device, inclusive or exclusive of the part of the leash being held by the handler that doesn't alarm the metal detectors?"

I am sure that there are some WEIs that can be hidden in or by way of a leash and/or leash device -- even a "thin leash" -- used by the handler. Some may alarm the metal detector, many others will not.

Originally Posted by Ari
With regard to the monkey, the monkey's diaper only needs to be inspected if the monkey alarms the metal detector. If the monkey doesn't alarm, the monkey gets to keep its dignity (and the diaper will not be removed, nor the monkey inspected at all). There is no double standard between the monkey diaper and the leash. If it doesn't alarm, it isn't inspected.
Announced policy or not, the TSA remains an agency with double standards in practice.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 12:45 pm
  #50  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Now, "[a]re you really sure that nothing can be hidden in a leash and/or leash device, inclusive or exclusive of the part of the leash being held by the handler that doesn't alarm the metal detectors?"
I said this:

As far as what can be hidden in the thin leash, there is nothing that can be hidden in the non-alarming leash that can't be hidden beneath one's clothing that doesn't alarm.
In other words, anything I would hide in the leash, I could hide in my underwear which for sure isn't going to be checked so checking the non-alarming leash would be an exercise in futility. Upon second thought, perhaps the TSA should do it-- they like such exercises.

Originally Posted by GUWonder
Announced policy or not, the TSA remains an agency with double standards in practice.
That may be true, but not in this case.
Ari is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 6:50 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Even if the monkey goes bananas on the TSA because the TSA spanked or otherwise abused the monkey, the TSA will still monkey around at airports as long as the TSA remains less accountable than a monkey.

Amongst the things the TSA and monkeys share in common -- they both steal or damage property owned by others.
Was going to comment on the excrement disposal techniques of angry monkeys, but thought that it might be too close to the edge.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 8:54 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: BOS/YYZ
Programs: Marriott LT Plat by proxy, Sephora VIB, I have a low AA FF#...
Posts: 951
Originally Posted by clrankin
Just remember that TSA won't allow you to take even the fanciest "dijon ketchup" through the checkpoint with you, as they'll classify it as a liquid. (Not to mention that some of them will likely be having hot dogs for lunch.)
And they will probably eat my Kraft Dinner, because I'll have more of it. (I usually eat Annie's anyway.)
longwaybackhome is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.