Travel Safety/Security needs moderator
May 25, 2004 | 4:47 pm
#16
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast MA, USA.
Programs: HHonors Diamond, DL Silver, TSA Harassee
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by attorney28
I am not willing to debate the merits of appointing a member with a member who apparently routinely turns off his humor and sarcasm detectors 
.
Seriously, I have no idea. In case you missed it, my suggestion was not entirely serious
.
.Seriously, I have no idea. In case you missed it, my suggestion was not entirely serious
.
May 25, 2004 | 4:56 pm
#17
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: BCT. Formerly known as attorney28
Programs: LH LT SEN,BA GGL GfL,Hyatt LT Gl,Mrtt LT P,HH LT D,IHG D-Amb,Acc D,GHA T,LHW A,Sixt/Av/Hz D/Pres
Posts: 6,947
Originally Posted by CameraGuy
I apologize for missing the "humor". You spend so much of your time defending indefensible actions, that you seemed quite serious.
. No problem.
May 25, 2004 | 5:04 pm
#18
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PDX, AMS, MSN, ORD. Dedicated to finding a cure for Republicanism in our time. "Won't you please help"? "For the children's sake"?
Programs: ! "Ya can't tell da' playahs wit'out a program!" NW silver, DIRT everywhere else.
Posts: 1,194
"Spiff for moderator!"
"Vote Spiff in '04!"
"I'm pro-Spiff, and I VOTE!"
"Vote Spiff in '04!"
"I'm pro-Spiff, and I VOTE!"
May 25, 2004 | 10:16 pm
#19
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 74,162
Say Yes or No - ONLY!
Here's a novel thought - say whether you think a moderator should be appointed or not - and leave it up to Randy to determine who if he decides one is necessary. THAT's the point of this thread - and leave it at that.
Drop all the who it should be, whether it should be partners or not, etc, & your subsequent votes & arguing back & forth (what, we didn't get enough of that in other threads on this forum? geesh) - it's RANDY's decision. The rest is irrelevent.
Drop all the who it should be, whether it should be partners or not, etc, & your subsequent votes & arguing back & forth (what, we didn't get enough of that in other threads on this forum? geesh) - it's RANDY's decision. The rest is irrelevent.
May 25, 2004 | 11:12 pm
#20
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PDX, AMS, MSN, ORD. Dedicated to finding a cure for Republicanism in our time. "Won't you please help"? "For the children's sake"?
Programs: ! "Ya can't tell da' playahs wit'out a program!" NW silver, DIRT everywhere else.
Posts: 1,194
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
Here's a novel thought - say whether you think a moderator should be appointed or not - and leave it up to Randy to determine who if he decides one is necessary. THAT's the point of this thread - and leave it at that.
Drop all the who it should be, whether it should be partners or not, etc, & your subsequent votes & arguing back & forth (what, we didn't get enough of that in other threads on this forum? geesh) - it's RANDY's decision. The rest is irrelevent.
Drop all the who it should be, whether it should be partners or not, etc, & your subsequent votes & arguing back & forth (what, we didn't get enough of that in other threads on this forum? geesh) - it's RANDY's decision. The rest is irrelevent.
I'm sure Mr Petersen appreciates the feedback he gets from the ideas exchanged here. Otherwise, he could just use personal messages. This way he has the input of the people who will ultimately be affected by his decision.
Much smarter than ^ or
.
Last edited by HigherFlyer; May 26, 2004 at 8:50 am
May 26, 2004 | 6:30 am
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 12,004
Originally Posted by HigherFlyer
"Spiff for moderator!"
"Vote Spiff in '04!"
"I'm pro-Spiff, and I VOTE!"
"Vote Spiff in '04!"
"I'm pro-Spiff, and I VOTE!"
May 26, 2004 | 8:45 am
#22
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Seattle
Programs: Ephesians 4:31-32
Posts: 10,690
I think his strength is in his hair.
May 26, 2004 | 10:38 am
#23
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,220
Originally Posted by Punki
I was thinking that working together would help them learn to like each other. They both have some very good qualities that I am sure they would learn to respect and appreciate if they started to work together.
Just a thought.
William
May 26, 2004 | 3:35 pm
#24
Founder of FlyerTalk
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,540
A moderator for that forum was made some time ago and I got caught up in other things. Thanks for bumping the idea, it is very much appreciated and i agree that it does seem from time-to-time that it gets personal. I recently had the pleasure of meeting Spiff at the Freddies and I actually felt quite honored. It's quite fun for me to actually meet members of FlyerTalk that in the way they have handled themselves on FT have become worthy of the accolades of their other members. Positive accolades. But I don' think this a good forum to ask his additional support of FT for. If I recall, anotehr moderator quite some months ago volunteered and now I've got to try and remember who that might have been. techgirl? Anyway, let me look around and see what volunteers we might have. Their first purpose remains the same as any other volunteer - to assist members who need help in determining the proper forums to post in as well as try and safeguard the posting privileges and opinions of each member - with respect as such.
Again thanks for the heads up and let me get going on this.
Again thanks for the heads up and let me get going on this.