Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PDX, AMS, MSN, ORD. Dedicated to finding a cure for Republicanism in our time. "Won't you please help"? "For the children's sake"?
Programs: ! "Ya can't tell da' playahs wit'out a program!" NW silver, DIRT everywhere else.
Posts: 1,194
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
Here's a novel thought - say whether you think a moderator should be appointed or not - and leave it up to Randy to determine who if he decides one is necessary. THAT's the point of this thread - and leave it at that.
Drop all the who it should be, whether it should be partners or not, etc, & your subsequent votes & arguing back & forth (what, we didn't get enough of that in other threads on this forum? geesh) - it's RANDY's decision. The rest is irrelevent.
Baloney.
I'm sure Mr Petersen appreciates the feedback he gets from the ideas exchanged here. Otherwise, he could just use personal messages. This way he has the input of the people who will ultimately be affected by his decision.
Much smarter than ^ or
.
Last edited by HigherFlyer; May 26, 2004 at 8:50 am