Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

xONEx max. 16 segments (speculation)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

xONEx max. 16 segments (speculation)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 8:03 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,641
Originally Posted by QF009
Nice!

I think the ONE product is still awesome value with the 20 segment limit. Then again I'm only in the midst of issuing my first, a DONE4 - might have a different opinion if I've done a DONE (pardon the pun) before the 20 segment limit.
Pun aside, I never know how to say the fare code when I'm talking to an airline on the phone. I'd like to say something A-WUN-Three, but at least once an agent had no idea what I meant until I spelled it out A-O-N-E-three.
JohnAx is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 2:47 am
  #17  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,142
Originally Posted by Guy Betsy
As far as E-tickets are concerned it'll be a maximum of 16 sectors. If you have a surface sector or arrive into one airport and depart from another, ie JFK/LGA, the ARNK bit counts as one sector !

AA is just preparing for end of 2007/beginning 2008 when all paper tickets will be done away with if e-ticketing is permitted. Which means that everything may be restricted to 16 sectors when you issue a RTW ticket. You may add on as you travel, but I don't know how AA or other oneworld partners will handle this - but I think it will be problematic no matter how simple the airlines want you to look at things.
Just wondering is it an IATA requirement to make ALL airlines to be Etix by 2008 (originally wasn't 2006?)
Dave Marsh is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 3:05 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by JohnAx
Pun aside, I never know how to say the fare code when I'm talking to an airline on the phone. I'd like to say something A-WUN-Three, but at least once an agent had no idea what I meant until I spelled it out A-O-N-E-three.
I've given up on that one; most of the time the agent doesn't know what I'm talking about (maybe due to my Spanglish) so I now just say "oneworld explorer, five continent, business class".
Viajero is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 3:22 am
  #19  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SYD
Posts: 3,045
Originally Posted by Dave Marsh
Just wondering is it an IATA requirement to make ALL airlines to be Etix by 2008 (originally wasn't 2006?)
The IATA-mandated deadline is Dec 31 2007. They were going to discuss extending the deadline:
http://www.itp.net/news/details.php?id=24035&category=

Who knows whether the extension will really occur.

Looks like the compulsory eticketing is going to cause quite a few problems with interline ticketing and RTW products.
Keith009 is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 8:09 am
  #20  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: RDU
Programs: TSA/INS/FBI Platinum (stopped last 12 of 13 int'l returns - the computer broke once)
Posts: 2,653
Wouldn't you just be able to have two e-tickets to get enough segments? I'm not familiar enough with the exact systems in booking to know, but I did see that a recent flight I had between AA and BA had two consecutive ticket numbers, one for the AA part and one for the BA part.
StSebastian is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 4:12 pm
  #21  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Andover, MA, 01810
Posts: 1,988
Can't AA lean on Sabre to raise the limit from 16? Can't be that difficult, can it?
UserMark is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 5:13 pm
  #22  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,641
Originally Posted by UserMark
Can't AA lean on Sabre to raise the limit from 16? Can't be that difficult, can it?
Programming staff have a habit of bidding vast sums for what seems like a simple change. Generally at least partially justified by the terrifying importance of making sure the change actually works as expected and doesn't somehow bring down the whole system. It's seldom as simple as crossing out a '16' somewhere and substituting a larger number.
JohnAx is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 6:15 pm
  #23  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,521
Originally Posted by JohnAx
Programming staff have a habit of bidding vast sums for what seems like a simple change. Generally at least partially justified by the terrifying importance of making sure the change actually works as expected and doesn't somehow bring down the whole system. It's seldom as simple as crossing out a '16' somewhere and substituting a larger number.
As I mentioned on another thread, it seems to me that AA in particular is at a disadvantage when it comes to automation in this regard. And as a subscriber to Sabre, Amadeus and Worldspan, I am gobsmacked at how these mid-20th Century artifacts can still survive in this day and age.

I had to laugh when the talk was that JL and MA's entry into OW was delayed pending updating their computer and res systems. Holy moley, what were they using? Abacus, fingers, toes and Post-its?
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 9:33 pm
  #24  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,512
This may be a bit redundant for the conversation but the 16 segment limit applies only to future segments on the ticket. I just completed an e-ticketed AA 19 segment DONE4 by adding the flights in half way through, this was something I was going to do anyway but it does mean that you can do a 20 segment e-ticketed AA *ONE, you just need to pay a $120 fee for the extra 4 segments. Yes, sucky and not fair but better than not being able to do them.
IMOA is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 9:42 am
  #25  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,641
Originally Posted by IMOA
This may be a bit redundant for the conversation but the 16 segment limit applies only to future segments on the ticket. I just completed an e-ticketed AA 19 segment DONE4 by adding the flights in half way through, this was something I was going to do anyway but it does mean that you can do a 20 segment e-ticketed AA *ONE, you just need to pay a $120 fee for the extra 4 segments. Yes, sucky and not fair but better than not being able to do them.
I hope the agent knew what s/he was doing. On one occasion AA handed me reissued xONEx tickets that worked fine on AA segments, but when I tried to check in for a flight JFK-HKG, Cathay's computer decreed my ticket to be worthless. Fortunately I had time, and the Cathay agent went off and reissued the ticket (gratis) properly.
JohnAx is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 12:12 am
  #26  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roses, Costa Brava, Spain
Programs: Seniors Bus Pass, lots of old plastic claiming to be precious metal
Posts: 512
Question Will e-tickets force *ONE* to max. 16 segments from 2008? (merged threads)

As many people will know, IATA wants to phase out paper tickets by the end of 2007. As shown in other threads, AA already has a policy of a maximum of 16 segments unless they (or their GSA) can be persuaded to issue a paper ticket. Does anyone know if this 16 segment limit is something set in stone (or silicon) by IATA IT system design?

If it is, will this mean a loss of 4 segments on *ONE* itineraries or is there some way round it, such as issuing two 10 segment e-tickets? (I'm sure I've had back-to-back e-tickets on different airlines under a single reservation code.)

Russ (currently planning a post-retirement 60K+ DONE6 for next year)
satprof is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 3:48 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-PP, HL-DM, MR-LTP, HY-LTG
Posts: 26,017
Originally Posted by satprof
... is there some way round it, such as issuing two 10 segment e-tickets? (I'm sure I've had back-to-back e-tickets on different airlines under a single reservation code.)

...
Er...no.
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 5:04 am
  #28  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SYD
Posts: 3,045
I hope that parallel to the compulsory eticketing deadline, they're also thinking of ways to expand the eticket's 'shell'?
Keith009 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 5:08 am
  #29  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roses, Costa Brava, Spain
Programs: Seniors Bus Pass, lots of old plastic claiming to be precious metal
Posts: 512
Thumbs up Deadline extended

Originally Posted by Guy Betsy
Er...no.
The deadline has been put back to 31 May 2008. See here for details.

Personally, I reckon that the 80/20 rule will apply yet again. In April 2007, some 80% of worldwide (IATA) tickets were electronic. Those with loads of IT experience will know that it usually takes 80% of the total effort to cope with the last 20% of cases, as this is where the most intractable issues are to be found. We shall see if even end-2008 can actually be met.

Last edited by satprof; Jun 11, 2007 at 5:14 am Reason: Stuffed-up URL
satprof is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 5:33 am
  #30  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SYD
Posts: 3,045
I'll be sure to keep my DONEx handwritten paper tickets as a souvenir.
Keith009 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.