![]() |
JFK-SYD as one flight segment
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska
(Post 35460459)
...ONEWORLD EXPLORER...
12. SURCHARGES Economy Class Passengers may travel in AA, CX, IB, JL, QF Premium Economy cabin or BA World Traveller Plus cabin for an additional charge, per flight segment of:... Sectors between SWP and North America ... USD 1450. |
Originally Posted by jrobin
(Post 35460908)
Presumably this surcharge would include QF4 JFK-SYD as it counts as one flight segment?
|
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska
(Post 35461080)
I'd say it should as it is a single flight number single segment, provided of course that you are flying straight thru and not stopping over in LAX to catch the next day's flight (in which case you would two segments).
|
I want to book a RTW starting in Japan with the first segment HND-PEK on JL.
JL doesn’t appear to be making D class available even close-in (I checked multiple dates on ExpertFlyer). Is it possible to book that segment in Y (any fare class) as a voluntary downgrade? |
Originally Posted by Ivan Denisovich
(Post 35536719)
I want to book a RTW starting in Japan with the first segment HND-PEK on JL.
JL doesn’t appear to be making D class available even close-in (I checked multiple dates on ExpertFlyer). Is it possible to book that segment in Y (any fare class) as a voluntary downgrade? |
Hoping someone can help me. I have an itinerary that I'm trying to book, and the ticketing airline is giving me problems.
Itinerary was valid on the Oneworld site and it let me make the booking. However, Qantas are claiming the itinerary is invalid due to it having 18 segments. Obviously, it was 16 on the OW site. My guess is they're counting BOS-LGA, JFK-LHR as 3 segments, whereas the OW site counted this as two. My understanding of the fare rules is that it talks about "city pairs" and therefore this should be two segments, as the system thought also. Does anyone have experience with this and how was it resolved? |
Originally Posted by t1379
(Post 35552979)
Hoping someone can help me. I have an itinerary that I'm trying to book, and the ticketing airline is giving me problems.
Itinerary was valid on the Oneworld site and it let me make the booking. However, Qantas are claiming the itinerary is invalid due to it having 18 segments. Obviously, it was 16 on the OW site. My guess is they're counting BOS-LGA, JFK-LHR as 3 segments, whereas the OW site counted this as two. My understanding of the fare rules is that it talks about "city pairs" and therefore this should be two segments, as the system thought also. Does anyone have experience with this and how was it resolved? From the rules: A minimum of three and a maximum of 16 segments, including surface segments between any two airports, are permitted for the entire journey. |
Originally Posted by jerry a. laska
(Post 35553038)
LGA-JFK is a separate segment.
The concept of coterminals does not apply to Oneworld explorer tickets since the advent of e-tickets. |
Originally Posted by t1379
(Post 35553100)
Thanks! I guess it's back to the drawing board. Another victim of the laggy RTW Oneworld site :(
BTW just reading what you've written above, if they're telling you that you have 18 segments instead of the allowed 16 then you have one more somewhere else that's invalid. BOS-LGA / JFK-LHR is only 3 segments because of the somewhat ridiculous surface segment across Queens. You could just drop that segment entirely and pay cash for BOS-NYC on your own and it'd drop you down a segment, shouldn't be more than $100-150 for that one, but still sounds like you have an extra one in there somewhere else that shouldn't be. Any other surface segments? |
Morning all.
It's been many years since I last did an XONEX ticket but am busy planning for one at the moment. I know many rules have changed since then so need some clarification on a specific flight. Is the non-stop DEL-JFK on AA still considered a transatlantic flight - which would therefore effectively cut out the ability to visit Europe? Or is it now considered a transpacific flight? Thanks |
Originally Posted by wijibintheair
(Post 35626889)
Morning all.
It's been many years since I last did an XONEX ticket but am busy planning for one at the moment. I know many rules have changed since then so need some clarification on a specific flight. Is the non-stop DEL-JFK on AA still considered a transatlantic flight - which would therefore effectively cut out the ability to visit Europe? Or is it now considered a transpacific flight? Thanks I tried it out in the on-line booking tool when the flight was first announced - see Oneworld Explorer considers AA's new JFK-DEL flight to be TPAC not Transatlantic - FlyerTalk Forums But I do not recall seeing it documented anywhere on the Oneworld web site. |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 35627050)
I believe it is considered a trans-pacific flight.
I tried it out in the on-line booking tool when the flight was first announced - see Oneworld Explorer considers AA's new JFK-DEL flight to be TPAC not Transatlantic - FlyerTalk Forums But I do not recall seeing it documented anywhere on the Oneworld web site. |
I have successfully booked an XONEX a few weeks ago with JFK-DEL being treated as a transpacific leg.
|
Hi everyone.
Quick question - is the $125 change fee for changing ticketed points charged on a per passenger basis, or just a set fee per booking. For example, I have a DONE5 for my wife and I, under the same reference number. If I wanted to change the ticketing points, will that be $125 or $250 change fee? Thanks! |
Originally Posted by Padkir
(Post 35638433)
Hi everyone.
Quick question - is the $125 change fee for changing ticketed points charged on a per passenger basis, or just a set fee per booking. For example, I have a DONE5 for my wife and I, under the same reference number. If I wanted to change the ticketing points, will that be $125 or $250 change fee? Thanks! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:11 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.