Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Northwest WorldPerks
Reload this Page >

NEWS: The Overall Northwest To File Chpt 11 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NEWS: The Overall Northwest To File Chpt 11 Thread

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2005, 7:47 pm
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi [+MKK4 EBBER R577 EDSEL R577 ELKEY EXERT]
Posts: 15,826
Originally Posted by rdg_dc
The DC9s have got to go.
Send those fully paid DC-9s away and NW would be in much worse shape.
slippahs is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 7:51 pm
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,544
Now we get to hear the Maple Bacon people claim they drove NW into BK.
Jaimito Cartero is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:04 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SEA, NW/DL 1.6Million Miler
Programs: DL 1MM Annual Silver,AS 100K 22-24, AS 75K 15-21
Posts: 4,278
Originally Posted by slippahs
Send those fully paid DC-9s away and NW would be in much worse shape.
I agree there. I think NW's decisions to keep flying the DC9's was a smart move.

While I still prefer flying DC9 over the jungle jets for its first class cabin and its bigger aircrafts, I just wished it's seats were better designed.

Jiburi
jiburi is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:10 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: buffalo,ny
Posts: 14
I am not sure what you mean, can you explain pls?
plannermann is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:18 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Astoria, NY: LGA, JFK
Programs: Delta PM; Sheraton's Vistana BOD; SPG Gold
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by plannermann
I am not sure what you mean, can you explain pls?
I think the OP is worried that tickets will become worthless if NW files for bankrupcy.
yogimax is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:35 pm
  #66  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by jiburi
I agree there. I think NW's decisions to keep flying the DC9's was a smart move.

While I still prefer flying DC9 over the jungle jets for its first class cabin and its bigger aircrafts, I just wished it's seats were better designed.

Jiburi
I agree that keeping the paid-for DC-9s throughout the 1990s when fuel averaged $0.55-0.70/gallon made perfect sense, as other airlines were spending billions on DC-9 replacements for their fleets.

But with fuel at over $2/gallon, the economics of old gas hogs changes quite a bit. Lease payments on new, fuel efficient jets aren't quite as expensive, in relative terms.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:40 pm
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by RustyC
Could the missed payments be causing concerns that there's something bad amiss that Wall Street doesn't know about? The problems with jet fuel, labor, etc., were well-known, but maybe they're worried about another shoe dropping on cash flow or reserves. Wall Street hates surprises.
Skipping the debt payment is a sure sign that NW will file Ch 11 on Wed or Thur. Companies on the courthouse steps typically skip some payments during the final couple of days to conserve cash.

Apparently a $65 million pension contribution is due on Thursday, so the filing will occur before that deadline.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 8:56 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by jiburi
Then on the other hand, does anyone know what, if any, assets are at stakes? In particular, I find the following items of value at Northwest.

1) NW/KLM Alliance
2) Flying rights to and beyond Japan (Is that Fifth Amendment Flying right)?
3) Agreements with Boeing for 787
4) Agreements with Airbus for current and future 333, 332, 320, 319, etc
5) Hubs at DTW, MSP, MEM, NRT, AMS
6) Operation at IND, SEA, HNL, LAX, SFO, LGA, JFK etc....
7) Veto rights associated with NW/CO Alliance
8) Little of Fuel Hedge they have going....
9) Retirements of aircrafts.....D10, 747 and DC9s??

There are probably more, but those are what I can think of....

Jiburi
1) valuable to NW, not to anyone else though--sale price=0
2) Fith freedom, I think (Bill of rights does not pertain beyond hawaii/alaska)
3) No value...anyone can get an agreement for an airplane..airbus would like to give more away.
4) all have value except AMS. AMS has value only in conjunction with KLM...not the #1 place to offer US to europe/africa connections.
7) no value to be able to veto yourself allying with anyone.
8) no hedge this year ( i am 95% certain of that)
9) that has a great write down cost, not a value.

Basicly, the fortress hubs and asian 5th freedom rights as well as an incredibly strong position in the midwest/plains, plus name recognition world wide are the things of value. A strike only detracts from the name brand value.


Edit...forgot the biggest asset to NW right now is large (relativly to all except AA and CO) cash on hand...that is huge.

Last edited by fastair; Sep 13, 2005 at 8:58 pm Reason: forgot $$ on hand
fastair is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 9:07 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 862
Originally Posted by Himmelhund
4)... all airlines will end up in some form of protection (save, perhaps Southwest, Jetblue etc.) but these smallish point-to-point airlines cannot keep the economy running in the fashion that the big airlines do [what is in the of the multi-route "legacy" airlines, to small towns all over the country, is primarily NOT our luggage].
Something missing in the []s? While many small communities may lose air service if the big airlines go away, I doubt it will have a very great impact on the economy. While 5 RJs a day may put a city on the aviation 'map', those cities could be better served otherwise.

For example:
25 years ago, one could travel from Temple There was an Amtrak train from Temple to Houston that took 4 hours.

15 years ago, the train was gone, and the best way was to travel 30 minutes to Killeen, fly to Dallas, and then connect to Houston. In theory 'travel' time had been reduced to just under three hours. However, tack on 30 minutes to get to the airport on both ends and its a wash. Add in the additional padding needed (worry about traffic, missed connections, etc.) and it looks worse than before.

Today Continental offers nonstop flights to the new Killeen airport. However, its now about a 50 minute trip from Temple to the airport.

And good 'ol bus service is still prodding along at about 5 hours from Temple to Houston. And you could also drive it in 4 hours.

Now to the original point - a lot of effort has been spent by the legacies to support air traffic to small cities. However, many of these small communities would be better served by alternate travel means. Many of them have even shown this. Even though Waco, Texas has its own airport, many fliers drive the two hours to Dallas or Austin, rather than flying out of Waco. Should the legacies evaporate, then Waco is not likely to see service resume. However, Waco itself would still be able to fulfill its travel needs.

Would NW leave, you can bet that the Asia service would be replaced in a heartbeat. And MSP-ORD, DTW-LGA, etc. would not be lacking. MSP-YQR, however, would probably not be picked up. However, there would still be connecting options like MSP-YYZ-YQR. The smaller cities would be the ones that would hurt - which would mean that us expense-account types would have doing what the locals do and drive to the big airports.

The legacies provide a service to the small communities by grouping their flights together at hubs, allowing connections in one stop between just about anywhere. However, the discounters are adept at picking off the most lucrative of these. Even if NW and WN had the same cost struture, NW would be at a disadvantage, since they would need two flights to travel PHL-MSP-OAK, while Southwest would do it in one. If Northwest offered a nonstop, they would hurt some of the podunk-MSP-PHL and podunk-MSP-OAK traffic.
L Dude 7 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 9:19 pm
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,451
Originally Posted by Syracuse
I am numb to chapter 11 now after UA and US stays so many years in bankrupcy.

Seems chapter 11 means nothing in today's airline industry. Airlines not in bankrupcy will be rare animals soon.
Amen! The game reminds me of being in jail in monopoly, of course, with much, much more at stake. The interesting part is when, or if, UA/US/DL/NW will emerge from protection and whether they're any leaner & meaner & smarter than when they went in.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 9:22 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
We need to keep in mind that there are millions of Americans who don't understand what happens when an airline files for protection under Ch 11 and they are legitimately scared that their tix may become worthless.

To add to that mass of confusion, in many other parts of the world, there is no such thing as reorganization under Ch 11 and the term bankruptcy roughly translates as a Ch 7 liquidation. The concept of ditching many debts in bankruptcy, trimming future bills, attracting new debt funding and continuing to fly is foreign to them.

To all of you people who don't live and breathe this stuff: Relax. Your tickets are fine.

At least for now. If the airline liquidates, then you'll have problems.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 10:21 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Upper Midwest
Programs: DL, AA
Posts: 1,677
The cash on hand has changed quite a bit, and is down to about only $1 Billion.

Of value (in order of importance):
1. Fifth freedom Japan rights
2. Hubs in Detroit and Minneapolis, Memphis of little value (too small of a city.) Quite complicated, but market is strongly controlled by NW and thus has a huge customer base.
3. The planes themselves
4. Early delivery slots for 787 (not the planes themselves, they're selling like hotcakes, Airbus slots fairly easy to obtain)
5. veto rights in Continental

The KLM immunized alliance comes only of interest if a merger takes place, which is highly unlikely. I'm also not familiar with the veto rights in Continental, whether they're transferable or not, how it works exactly, etc. etc.

The DC-9s were still quite useful a couple years ago even, but now with the skyrocketing gas prices, they just aren't efficient enough anymore.
bk42 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 10:39 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
Originally Posted by mjcasta
A foreign entity may not have a greater than 49% interest in a US carrier. Does this restrict foreign entities from providing or participating in DIP financing??
It's actually 25% here in the US (unlike most other countries, where you are correct in the 49% figure).

That said, even 25% would be a serious chunk of cash.

Obviously all the current payments are behind withheld because if they decide to file tomorrow, that would essentially be throwing money away.

I have to believe that any vote tomorrow is a formality.

Steve
sllevin is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 10:44 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,217
We have nothing to worry about. I'm a long time US Chairman's Preferred member (and a NW Platinum this year), and Chapter 11 really doesn't impact customers directly. HOWEVER - Expect further on board cuts, aircraft returns, cut routes, reduced F meals, etc. US flyers are used to this. UA has done a better job of not cutting on board service, but, then again, some would argue they should be cutting more. Don't fret. Don't panic. Just book the airline you want to fly with a credit card and you'll be fine.
USFlyerUS is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2005, 10:50 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: MSP
Programs: Skyteam, *A, 1W
Posts: 650
Originally Posted by FWAAA
...
To add to that mass of confusion, in many other parts of the world, there is no such thing as reorganization under Ch 11 and the term bankruptcy roughly translates as a Ch 7 liquidation. The concept of ditching many debts in bankruptcy, trimming future bills, attracting new debt funding and continuing to fly is foreign to them.

To all of you people who don't live and breathe this stuff: Relax. Your tickets are fine.

At least for now. If the airline liquidates, then you'll have problems.
Your point above is so true.

I'm actually tired of explaining to my colleagues at work that their miles and future tix are safe...

Last edited by Infinity; Sep 13, 2005 at 10:57 pm
Infinity is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.