Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Northwest WorldPerks
Reload this Page >

TOPIC: Strike as a General Issue >> Your Thoughts

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TOPIC: Strike as a General Issue >> Your Thoughts

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:33 am
  #436  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Central Florida
Programs: Bonvoy-Gold, HH-Gold, UA-Gold, *A-Gold, Hyatt-Discoverist
Posts: 2,046
Originally Posted by LTRS
I pay much better than union scale. And it pays off well for me. I have the best trained workers in the industry and they are extremely loyal. They have helped me grow my business 25-30% every year for the past 6 yrs. People are a company's greatest asset.

I agree. You treat your employees well and pay them well. Treat them with respect and they will go through walls for you. Also, I do agree that unions in certain situations are necessary and sometimes make it easier for management. Uniformity in pay scales and such are a boon. However, humans tend to be crybabies and if you get them all together and cry together it handcuffs management if you have a bunch of employees who really don't give a darn about you and your business. They are there to take what they can and see what they can get away with for the least work. Unions that use no common sense and purposely, in my opinion, loot businesses just because they can are not helpful at all.

Trust me I could tell you some stories about how some international reps lined their own pockets with gold at the expense of the membership. So, let's be real and stop drinking the union Koool-Aid and get in the real world.

- HF
HobokenFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:36 am
  #437  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: He who dies with the most miles wins!!
Programs: WorldPerks Demoted again to SE, DL 3.1MM Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 11,678
We already know that ALPA will cross lines.

We know that PFAA didnt walk.
mikey1003 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:37 am
  #438  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by LTRS
And bye bye to my NW status, because I won't be able to make it this year. I won't cross a picket line. And frankly, shame on the NW FA's and pilots for doing so.
Sounds good to me, one less passenger up in FC. Might give some other elites a chance on the flights you would otherwise take.

I plan on conducting future business with NWA. The mechanic's union does not have my support. I wish them luck at finding other jobs or another career. Labor cuts have to be made, plain and simple, even if it means eliminating 53% of the positions. Many people who do not hold "union" positions, myself included have had to adapt to the changing economy. The airline industry has changed and is no longer what it used to be.

FWIW, I just purchased a package from NWA World Vacations. ^

SDF_Traveler
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:37 am
  #439  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by HobokenFlyer
I pay my own health insurance and I survive. Pension, what's that? I am the 401(k) generation. Hmmm and Union rules ALWAYS increase efficiencies in operation and all the labor is maxmized for best output. Union rules eliminate, "That's not my job" statements and so forth. I am sure that if the union didn't exist, they really didn't need those half of the employees and their salary would be in line with other mecahnics in the industry.

When times get tough you have to suck it up. In my business, me and my family have taken pay cuts, was not paid commissions, health insurance not paid for and, among other things, our houses mortgaged to get the business through tough times. You do what you have to do to survive. If you are not that emotionally invested, then simply leave. You can't have it both ways.

You can only live off the fat for so long, unions have got so used to it for so long, it's trying to get a junkie off of smack.

- HF
If you are foolish enough to "compete" in your industry by providing a product at less than it costs to provide it (which is exactly what the moron executives throughout the industry have done), then you deserve those troubles. And if you're a real sleaze you will make your workers pay the price for your stupidity while giving yourself a big fat raise as NW management did.

That's is what is really going on here.
LTRS is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:38 am
  #440  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by SRQ Guy
I'd suck it up and take the pay cut or, more likely, find a better job.
The key in this situation is that the employees have already been through rounds of pay cuts.

It's one thing if there's a pay cut or benefit reduction, a lot of people have dealt with that. If it's a one-time deal, and there's a glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel, I'd say suck it up.

At this point, their pay and benefits have been so devalued, NW's future isn't a sure thing, many of them will lose their jobs anyway with a new contract, so the company isn't giving them much to work with.

What do they have to lose here?
channa is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:39 am
  #441  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 306
update from SFO

I saw a few pickets outside but inside the board showed no cancelled flights for this morning. Everything seems to be arriving pretty much on time (for a foggy August am) and departures are all listed as on time.
SFO voyageur is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:39 am
  #442  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Central Florida
Programs: Bonvoy-Gold, HH-Gold, UA-Gold, *A-Gold, Hyatt-Discoverist
Posts: 2,046
Originally Posted by LTRS
Right now I drive an Acura.
Dude, your Acura is a Honda which is Japanese. I don't care if the car is made in Ohio with Union Labor, where are the parts sourced? Where do the profits go ? Owning an Acura is not helping US Labor. You buy an American nameplate and more of you money will be helping American workers than buying that Acura "assembled" in Ohio. More people in Japan are benefitting off you than Americans. So, if you are all for "American" labor, sell that Acura, buy GM or Ford.

- HF
HobokenFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:39 am
  #443  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PDX
Programs: Atmos Gold, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,747
Originally Posted by DHAST
Perhaps I'm jaded, but I spent six years living in Washington, DC and the outlying suburubs before I lived in LA. Since perception is reality, all I've seen since my 19th birthday is astronomical real estate prices and costs of living. I've also worked for the airlines for a couple of years and still work in aviation to this day. I'll probably retire in this industry in some way shape or form. What that means is that I'm a little more sensitive to labor issues in this industry. Oh, just so we're clear: I have never had union representation. One other thing... when I finally start my career job, there's only 20 places in the country that I stand a reasonable chance of getting assigned, and those are in some of the highest costs of living areas in the country, because, by nature of the job, they are located in some of the largest cities.
But no one forced you to choose this lifestyle. We've been through this discussion on this forum before, ad nauseum. If you think your career choice offers a poor quality of life, then change it! To demand outsized compensation, above and beyond what the market will bear, and then to bitterly complain when the market won't bear that demand, is ludicrous, self-flagellating, and downright masochistic.


Originally Posted by DHAST
I guess we're discussing whether or not mechanics were voting down a "good" contract or a "bad" contract. Or maybe not. Either way, I am categorically against using any sort of broad average examples (really, anything larger a county average) when discussing anything to do with wages. Why? It's just too broad, and the concentration of airline workers are in large cities, where your cost of living is greater than the cost of living in smaller towns. If we were discussing the cost of living in the counties surrounding NW's hub airports, then maybe we could get a better grip and have a more meaningful discussion about salaries vs. cost of living.

...

Again, statewide averages are too broad to have any real meaningful discussion. Look at the average household income in Minneapolis/St. Paul and the surrounding areas vs. the avereage household income in the rest of the state. I'll bet you that there's a significant difference. Likewise, look at the average annual income of Wayne County, MI and the surrounding counties vs. the rest of MI. Again, I'm sure you'll see a large disparity. Northern MN and the U.P. of MI are not exactly expensive places to live in, and likwise, the average incomes are lower. NW doesn't have too many mechanics in Hibbing/Chisolm MN nor Marquette, MI. They have lots in Minneapolis and Detroit.
According the the US Census (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...US-1&-_sse=on), you will note that 79% of all Americans live in urbanized areas and 80% live in metropolitan areas. The average salaries I cited earlier already account for the fact that 4 out of 5 Americans live in higher-cost urban centers. Besides, while MSP and DTW are likely more expensive than smaller towns in the Midwest, you certainly can't argue that they are more expensive than the entire Northeast and West coasts of the United States, where 112 million Americans work, pay taxes, and buy houses. Since you are from the DC area, you should know that the cost of living is higher there than it is in the Midwest: according to BestPlaces.net (http://www.bestplaces.net/col/Default.aspx)
Washington DC is 20% more expensive than Detroit, and housing is 32% more expensive (vastly underextimated, because the data are from 2000, and since then home prices in DC have approximately doubled).

Still feeling all that sympathy for MSP and DTW based mechs 'scraping by' on 58,000 - or 70,000 according to the Detroit Free Press - living in cities which have costs of living only slightly higher than the national average?

Originally Posted by DHAST
I think you're being way to general again. The BS college co-ops, internships, and beer-money jobs aside, I have never had a job that did not have those benefits, and I have never belonged to a union. I have also never even looked at a job that did not have those benefits. I can't tell where those stastics came from or what they encompass, but you have to realize that certain economies (farming, tourism among others) are typically not union nor do they provide benefits. Again, any job I've looked at within a large corporation, without union representation, provides those benefits. My point is, throwing around the word "union" is just too general. In aviation, if you want to compare union jobs vs. non union jobs, I suspect you will find the benefit packages to be very similar.
Perhaps it's time to ask what you do for a living, and how much you make, that you do lead such a seemingly jaded lifestyle. As I pointed out in the links above, you apparently have access to wonderful benefits - benefits that many Americans don't. Perhaps you are entitled to them; maybe you work very long hours; maybe your position has required an enormous amount of training and education; maybe you're just really smart, or really lucky, or both. That's neither here nor there. The point is, the majority of American workers have access to fewer benefits, and make substantially less money, than the mechs that we are talking about.

Originally Posted by DHAST
I look at is as a quality of life issue. Dual wage earner households are making it more difficult for single wage earner households to make a decent living and have a decent quality of life. Not to mention having to put the kids in day care all day because mom "has" to work.
You may or may not be right, but again, facts are facts. This is what most American couples do to survive. I make a very good living, but Mrs. Psychtobe works, too. So do the sig ots of most of my friends and colleagues. It is the American way, 21st century style. We can debate the pros and cons of that lifestyle, but I hope you're not advocating for striking NW mechanics to be the lone voice in the wilderness on this issue! I can just see the headlines now: "NW mechanics strike; claim US government enslaves its workers by forcing women to work; advocate for single earner families and return to 1950s!"

Originally Posted by DHAST
I'm not sure where you got that 1 in 12 figure, but again, I think we're being too general.
That figure is well-known and is sourced to the Department of Labor website.

Originally Posted by DHAST
What were they supposed to do, sign a contract eliminating 53% of their jobs and giving significant paycuts to those left over? Making what I make, if I ever had to voluntarily give up one dime, I wouldn't do it willingly or without a fight.
I do agree with you here. The mechs didn't have a good choice. When more than 50% of the voting base was guaranteed to lose their jobs, the strike was inevitable.

The outcome, however, is also inevitable. Mech wages and jobs will be cut, and by a significant amount. Global trade brings global competition and every American worker can feel it. Unless you are advocating for protectionist restrictions to international trade, the trend is unstoppable. Mechanics work can be done cheaper by someone else. Eventually it will be.

Last edited by psychtobe; Aug 20, 2005 at 10:42 am
psychtobe is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:40 am
  #444  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
Sounds good to me, one less passenger up in FC. Might give some other elites a chance on the flights you would otherwise take.
And you will have contributing to driving down wages in this country while I will not have. And I will sleep well at night knowing my dollars did not go to support that.
LTRS is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:43 am
  #445  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,429
Originally Posted by LTRS
You've hit upon the solution -- charge more for the flights! I am happy to pay it. The cost gets passed on to my customers, who are all driving BMWs, Lexus and Benz's. They can afford it.
All of my travel (and my wife's) is paid for out of our own pockets. We quite like the status quo, and we don't have any customers to pass the costs on to.

Deregulation of the airline industry has brought about competition and a reduction in ticket prices that has made air travel affordable for millions. This mechanics strike is one of the last gasps of the old system; it will soon be over and forgotten.

Meanwhile, LTRS, if you would like give NW a big tip every time you fly & soak your customers for the expense, I'm sure NW would appreciate your generosity.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:46 am
  #446  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by HobokenFlyer
Dude, your Acura is a Honda which is Japanese. I don't care if the car is made in Ohio with Union Labor, where are the parts sourced? Where do the profits go ? Owning an Acura is not helping US Labor. You buy an American nameplate and more of you money will be helping American workers than buying that Acura "assembled" in Ohio. More people in Japan are benefitting off you than Americans. So, if you are all for "American" labor, sell that Acura, buy GM or Ford.

- HF
I'm not really interested in helping US robber barrons of this era. I won't buy a car that is not made by US workers, but I have no loyalty to US robber barron corporations, so don't really care where the profits go so long as the employees get decent treatment. I also try to stay in union hotels when I travel. Not always possible, but I try.

Union busting drives down wages for all of us eventually. I'm not sure why I should spend my dollars to drive a knife into my own back in the long run. We can agree to disagree, but I think you are being short-sighted.
LTRS is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:49 am
  #447  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 306
Those rust belt city workers have not yet grasped that those high paying jobs are already gone. They can strike or fight back or whatever but nothing will bring them back.
SFO voyageur is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:52 am
  #448  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
All of my travel (and my wife's) is paid for out of our own pockets. We quite like the status quo, and we don't have any customers to pass the costs on to.

Deregulation of the airline industry has brought about competition and a reduction in ticket prices that has made air travel affordable for millions. This mechanics strike is one of the last gasps of the old system; it will soon be over and forgotten.

Meanwhile, LTRS, if you would like give NW a big tip every time you fly & soak your customers for the expense, I'm sure NW would appreciate your generosity.
You won't like the status quo when it trickles down to you. I don't know who your employer is, but if they paid you decently you could afford to pay what it costs to fly instead of reveling at that fact that you pay less than what it costs the airline to fly you, which in turn results in money being lifted out of the pockets of their workers.

Next time you fly NW why don't you just go up to a mechanic and demand his wallet? Cut out the middleman.
LTRS is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:53 am
  #449  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
To understand this you must first understand unions

Originally Posted by civicmon
It's that kind of childish mentality which is why there's so much pro-NW support on here.

I never understood what a union stands to gain by ruining a company... doesn't make sense to me. I'm all for workers and stuff but not when union pimps are portraying them as sabeteurs.
Here's the problem, unions are run by people who don't work for the employers, but are employed off the backs of the union membership themselves. These featherbedders are still earning a paycheck today unilike the union membership who they ordered to the picket lines. Mister O.V. whoever he is will still be able to make his mortgage payment next month. How about the guys who are walking in a circle holding a stick in the air? The unions are only interested in doing things that keep the DUES rolling in. Follow the money, kids. Here's something that few folks ever ponder and it tells you a world of information about unions: They HURT companies, ALWAYS. And the unions know this. Look on ANY union website and you will see that they make it clear that it is everybody's DUTY to organize EVERY workplace, regardless of situation. But why is it, if unions are so damn good, that unions fight to the death against any attempt by their office workers to join a union? They KNOW that it hurts the organization. So only evil corporations should have to tolerate a unionized workforce, its rigid work rules, its reluctance to terminate the incompetent...but unions themselves should not be inconvenienced by having to abide by the same rules and conditions that evil corporations do. Unions want the freedom to do exactly what the evil corporations are prohibited from doing by the union contracts.

The other thing that you MUST understand here is that unions are about two things and two things only: MONEY and POWER. They can insist that they are about working wages, membership, and workers rights or whatever other nonsense they spew, but they are only about money and power.

The airline has to cut costs. There is just no way around this. They cannot keep paying these exorbitant salaries (yes, EXORBITANT, based on the company's ability to pay them) but the union feels that they can get jobs kept and wages high by--here's the union logic--HURTING THE AIRLINE as badly as they can.

I have worked for struggling companies before, and when they came to me and said that they were in trouble, I tried to find ways to be more productive, spend less money to get the same work quality, eliminate as much waste as I could, to keep the company afloat and my paycheck rolling in. These birds do the exact opposite and think that they can get continued paychecks and all the present jobs by inflicting as much finacnial damage as they can.

I flew NWA out of Denver back home to Chicago last week. While filling up the car at the airport gas station, I noticed an airport work truck with a union bumper sticker on it. It said something like "Strength, Unity, Pride" or words very close to that. Ever notice how union rarah propaganda never says things like "Efficiency, profitability, productivity" or things that actually HELP a company. The union mentality is that by being big and mean, they can intimidate anyone to do anything.

Unions shops are adverserial by nature. The workers hate everything and are convinced that the company is out to get them. The company wants to make money for its owners. So instead of doing what needs to be done to make the place profitable, they do as little as possible for as much as possible. They claim that a union shop is the only way to higher pay. I have worked several union jobs and every time, EVERY SINGLE TIME I leave the union job for a nonunion job and get a HUGE pay increase. When you then add in the fact that my salary was even lower at the union shop because the union steals money from the membership through dues that are used in large part to support political causes that the membership may or may not agree with and to pay the inflated salaries of union bosses, the nonunion shops are far far more beneficial for my family. You want to know how I avoid getting fired? IM THE BEST AT WHAT I DO. In the real world, the most efficient employee who gets the most done and makes the company the most money gets the cherry work assignments and the best schedules. In the union world, it's who ever has been there the longest, regardles of if there is a new guy who outproduces them. Any system where seniority is more important than work quality and quantity is hopelessly doomed to failure. If I have to depend on a collective bargaining contract to have job security, I have a lot of job improvement to do. Then again, I blame my misfortunes on myself rather than on my employer. I realize that if I'm not the best in the shop, that I have some worrying and some improvement to do. A union worker takes the same situation and worries about who has seniority and takes no personal responsibility whatsoever.

Final thought: The union mind is so disconnected from reality that if they run across someone crossing their picket line to do replacement work, they actually believe that calling that person a "scab" will make them turn around and run home. They don't understand that this person needs the work and they can call them any name in the book and they are going to go on and earn the money that the union worker has voluntarily walked away from. Sometimes the union mind then says "unga-bunga, me beat up scab" and use violence to accomplish what namecalling couldn't.

GO NWA! I will be flying on you this upcoming week!!

--Paul
VideoPaul is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 10:55 am
  #450  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
Originally Posted by LTRS
Their competitors are going BK as well (or will) for the same reason. It's a race to the bottom and we all lose.
Southwest, Air Tran, Jet Blue. I hadn't realized they were all going bankrupt.
SRQ Guy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.