![]() |
Originally Posted by SadPandas
... so f-them.
. |
Yikes! It's here!!
|
Originally Posted by psychtobe
DHAST, you make some interesting points. It's true, for instance, that 58k isn't "a lot" of money; it's also true that living in LAX is likely to be more expensive than living in, say, LIT or IAH or any number of other American cities.
But facts are facts, and you are ignoring many in order to support your position. 1. From http://www.salary.com/careers/layout...74&part=Par555 "The average yearly American salary is [snip]..." 2. You state that "Living in L.A. on one income, $58k is nothing." It's true that single-income households make less than dual-income households. However, I am unaware of any rule, any regulation, or any data that says that mechanics must be the only working member of a household. 3. Combining these two data points leads to a surprising conclusion: the mechanic salary cited by StSebastian is 33% higher than the median household income in the United States, according to the US Census (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/incom...statemhi.html), and 5% higher than the median household income in New Jersey, the state with the highest household income in the country, even though by a 2 to 1 margin, most US married-couple households are dual income. 4. As for benefits, you claim that "Most people in non union jobs have those benefits as well." I perhaps did not choose the best examples to make my point; according to the Department of labor [snip]... No one is "blaming the mechanics." Facts is facts. Only 1 in 12 American private sector workers is unionized; the other 11, on average, have access to lesser benefits than that 1 union worker. Unions are out of touch with reality, and the mechanics are going to learn that the hard way, I'm afraid. The public support just isn't there. |
Alan,
It is standard practice for airline mechanics to have their own tools. You should have seen it after 9/11 when they shut off all of the security-free employee access points where you could come and go at will with your tools and then forced you to use the security check point. Your tool, necessary for your job, is now a prohibited weapon at the airport. |
What the??? And -- Nice Severance Package
Okay... this is just rich (excerpt from a NW Strike article on the Star Tribune website):
Northwest flight attendants voted not to honor the strike, but the union said it would fight on behalf of any individuals who did not cross the AMFA picket lines. I think this statement by the FA union is a load of crap. Let me demonstrate by applying the same logic to my conduct when I fly NW: I, Poopdeck90210, do hearby proclaim that the next flight I fly in coach, I promise not to cross the line into FC to use the FC bathrooom, stand in line in front of the cockpit door to wait for the bathroom to free up, and to not put my carry on luggage in the FC overhead. But I will fight and argue with NW crew members in case I decide to do some or all of these things anyway. :rolleyes: :confused: Bill Mellon, a Northwest spokesman, said the offer included job protections for 80 percent of the mechanics on the payroll and up to a maximum of 26 weeks of severance payments for laid-off workers Wow! This severance offering is as good as management normally gets in corporate america. :) ^ -Alan |
Originally Posted by psychtobe
My guess: there just isn't a lot of sympathy for a mechanic who, despite having experience and a family to feed, makes $58,000 per year.
|
Flawed Logic
Originally Posted by AAFA
They can hire thousands of workers and the rest of the people don't have to be on strike to cause a disruption. If the crews decide to write everything up in sympathy there is no way the replacement workers are ever going to be able to address all of those write ups and keep the operation running close to normal. We'll just have to see in the coming morning departure hours.
-Alan |
Originally Posted by StSebastian
Plus, 1500 total people does not mean they're all working all at the same time for every hour in the week. If each of them is working a 40 hour week and there are 168 hours in the week, then that's 23% of them working at any given time, or 381 mechanics available systemwide on an average basis.
-Alan |
World Has Changed Around NW Mechanics
Originally Posted by AAFA
You're losing sight of the corporate greed here.
-Alan |
Making Up New Rules, What Fun!
Originally Posted by AAFA
Because they are legally not allowed to strike. They weren't in negotiations and they didn't have a strike vote.
If they do a sympathy strike they will be fired and their unions are subject to hefty fines. :rolleyes: -Alan |
It is good to see that some of the NW employees would like to keep their jobs and still have a company to work for.
Thank you for voting NO and for flying. It appears that the FA's are a bit smarter and/or have a better leader than the mechanics. |
That is very good news. From the various reports it seems that the the AMFA is not a very well thought of Union as far as other unions are concerned. I have sympathy for the mechanics, but they brought any (financial) trouble they may encounter because of a strike on themselves and I believe it is wise for the other unions not to follow along like Lemings to their death.
|
I may be wrong, but I don't believe the early cancelations are a result of the mechanics being off the job. I think they are a result of before the mechanics left the job they took the planes out of service and they can not get back into service until a mechanic (ie.the replacements) get in and fix and/or authorize the plane to fly again.
I don't know all the legaleze about aircraft maintenance, but it seems like a large percentage of planes have been "down for maintenance" since the cooling off period begun. So, technically they are a result of the strike, or at least the build up to it. But not a direct result of the mechanics walking off the job. I think it was more of a "Lets see how much damage we can do before we leave" type of thing. |
Originally Posted by AAFA
You're losing sight of the corporate greed here.
|
Originally Posted by wldtrvlr
I may be wrong, but I don't believe the early cancelations are a result of the mechanics being off the job. I think they are a result of before the mechanics left the job they took the planes out of service and they can not get back into service until a mechanic (ie.the replacements) get in and fix and/or authorize the plane to fly again.
I don't know all the legaleze about aircraft maintenance, but it seems like a large percentage of planes have been "down for maintenance" since the cooling off period begun. So, technically they are a result of the strike, or at least the build up to it. But not a direct result of the mechanics walking off the job. I think it was more of a "Lets see how much damage we can do before we leave" type of thing. I don't think NW's plan is working out as great as they thought it would but if the majority thinks like the above poster I will give them points for winning the PR game. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:05 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.