Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Wall Street Journal Subscriptions

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Wall Street Journal Subscriptions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 6:01 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
Originally Posted by biggestbopper
The NY Times has announced that full access on the 'Net will be free as of midnight, Sept. 18, 2007.

By the way, several bloggers have suggested that this freeing of net access is bad news for the future of newspapers. @:-)

I like getting the paper in real form every morning. Just hope I can continue to do it.

Yahoo news just doesn't cut it!
You (and I) are probably signaling "advanced" age with our stated preferences for actual newsprint in hand rather than getting it online, notwithstanding the many advantages that online affords. (My wife won't let me save old newspapers, and infinitely easier to go back online than with the non-electronic.) I was disappointed that the NYT reduced its page size a while ago, though have gotten over it.
itsme is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:47 am
  #92  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,082
Murdoch's Choice: Paid or Free for WSJ.com?

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

September 19, 2007

News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch hasn't completed his purchase of Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, but already Mr. Murdoch and Dow Jones executives are debating a key strategic question: Should the Journal fall in line with the rest of the industry and make its 11-year-old paid-subscription Web site free?
Mr. Murdoch has been dropping hints that he is contemplating doing just that when he takes over, raising the idea in interviews before he clinched the deal and more openly in recent meetings with top Journal editors and Dow Jones Chief Executive Richard F. Zannino.

http://online.wsj.com/public/article...997631717.html
Tenacious is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 1:11 pm
  #93  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
Well, so long as they publish a paper edition, those who like to hold it in their hands, as I do, will have a good use for odd amounts of "orphan" miles. (What way other than through subscriptions to get value for small, odd lots of miles?)
itsme is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 2:02 pm
  #94  
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SORT OF HOMELESS
Programs: 14 years AA exp, but no more; & 1MM+, QR-PLT (ow EMD) MR-LTT, HH Gold
Posts: 8,104
I welcome the move by WSJ. About 90% of my daily reading has been of the online version. Its neat that you can save articles and charts for reading later without a pile of old paper around.
allset2travel is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 4:19 pm
  #95  
30 Nights
30 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 805
any way to *renew* a WSJ subscription with frequent flyer orphan miles? Can I just type in the same address and assume that they'll add on the length of the new subscription- anyone try this before? Does this also work for the economist?
schistosomiasis is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 2:55 pm
  #96  
Original Member
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Escondido CA USA
Programs: AS, UA, HY, Hil, Merr
Posts: 3,332
I used orphan miles with Delta for the Economist (original subscription).
I have used same for the WSJ twice now. Each time I let them lapse and then resubscribed. I do not know a way to just extend one. Perhaps these are "deals" cut between the publisher and the airlines to eventually get you to put up money for the extention. I think so.
ranles is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 6:17 pm
  #97  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,020
Originally Posted by itsme
You (and I) are probably signaling "advanced" age with our stated preferences for actual newsprint in hand rather than getting it online, notwithstanding the many advantages that online affords. (My wife won't let me save old newspapers, and infinitely easier to go back online than with the non-electronic.) I was disappointed that the NYT reduced its page size a while ago, though have gotten over it.
Actual print has advantages, too. For example, I can read the WSJ at Peet's cafe drinking excellent coffee even though there is no wifi access there. And, I can scan the stories much more thoroughly and quickly in paper.

As to saving and searching articles--imaging and online searching really are faster. But, for coffee shop reading, give me newsprint.

As for advanced age. you and I are advanced, but it is not in age.
biggestbopper is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 9:47 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
Originally Posted by biggestbopper
Actual print has advantages, too. For example, I can read the WSJ at Peet's cafe drinking excellent coffee even though there is no wifi access there. And, I can scan the stories much more thoroughly and quickly in paper.

As to saving and searching articles--imaging and online searching really are faster. But, for coffee shop reading, give me newsprint.

As for advanced age. you and I are advanced, but it is not in age.
I thought you were going to say something about the use of actual print to line the bird cage, wrap fish, etc.

I have no experience of Peet's, but when the founder died recently, his obits credited him with being the connossieur of coffee and expert on roasting that Starbucks and others all were deeply indebted to. Are you in CA, WA, or somewhere else that Starbucks doesn't own?

As for "advanced age," when does that come? I've heard you take half the number of years until you would reach 100 and add that to your current age to define what is "old."
itsme is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 9:21 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ventura, CA
Programs: UA 1P, MR PE ++++
Posts: 147
Originally Posted by itsme
I have no experience of Peet's, but when the founder died recently, his obits credited him with being the connossieur of coffee and expert on roasting that Starbucks and others all were deeply indebted to. Are you in CA, WA, or somewhere else that Starbucks doesn't own?
Although Starbucks pretty much does run CA, for the 1 Peet's in our town their are 7 Starbucks, 1 Coffee Bean and 2 local shops in a 2 mile radius. At least we do have a choice. Just bring in a Dunkin'....
Irrover is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 9:48 am
  #100  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,082
Murdoch: WSJ.com Expected to Be Free...

ADELAIDE, Australia (AP) -- News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said Tuesday he intends to make access to The Wall Street Journal's Web site free, trading subscription fees for anticipated ad revenue.
"We are studying it and we expect to make that free, and instead of having one million (subscribers), having at least 10 million-15 million in every corner of the earth," Murdoch said.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071113/news_....v=5&printer=1
Tenacious is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 8:38 pm
  #101  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
Originally Posted by Tenacious
ADELAIDE, Australia (AP) -- News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said Tuesday he intends to make access to The Wall Street Journal's Web site free, trading subscription fees for anticipated ad revenue.
"We are studying it and we expect to make that free, and instead of having one million (subscribers), having at least 10 million-15 million in every corner of the earth," Murdoch said.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071113/news_....v=5&printer=1
So when is online availability supposed to start? In the meantime, I hope to use more miles to start a new subscription to take the place of the 13-week one that just expired.
itsme is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 5:59 pm
  #102  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 41
I was going to redeem my UA or AA miles for a WSJ subscription. However, I do not see this as an option on either site. Can someone tell me if WSJ is an option with another FF program? And do you think not having on AA and UA is just a temporary omission? Thanks.
ajlee7 is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 8:05 am
  #103  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Here! (Or there - I'm not sure)
Programs: Peon in all
Posts: 4,358
Originally Posted by ajlee7
I was going to redeem my UA or AA miles for a WSJ subscription. However, I do not see this as an option on either site. Can someone tell me if WSJ is an option with another FF program? And do you think not having on AA and UA is just a temporary omission? Thanks.
WSJ IS on UA - it is listed as "THE Wall Street Journal"!

Although it is not a true FFP, you can also find WSJ on Amtrak AGR. On UA, you get 6/$, but on AGR, you get 20/$!
the_traveler is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 9:13 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: united airlines
Posts: 4,967
Originally Posted by the_traveler
WSJ IS on UA - it is listed as "THE Wall Street Journal"!

Although it is not a true FFP, you can also find WSJ on Amtrak AGR. On UA, you get 6/$, but on AGR, you get 20/$!
Perhaps I'm obtuse, but I don't understand, "On UA, you get 6/$, but on AGR, you get 20/$." Are you referring to how many miles/points it takes to get x number of weeks of the WSJ, or what? Please explain.
itsme is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 5:17 am
  #105  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by the_traveler
WSJ IS on UA - it is listed as "THE Wall Street Journal"!

Although it is not a true FFP, you can also find WSJ on Amtrak AGR. On UA, you get 6/$, but on AGR, you get 20/$!
Hi, I get the following message when I redeem miles, select newspaper subscription, and enter my zip code on UA MP: "No Newspapers available for the selection". I do not see any selection for WSJ for AA Aadvantage.
ajlee7 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.